Filtering strategies for improving protein identification in high‐throughput MS/MS studies
暂无分享,去创建一个
Tero Aittokallio | Tuula A Nyman | Olli S Nevalainen | Jussi Salmi | T. Aittokallio | J. Salmi | O. Nevalainen | T. Nyman
[1] Karl Mechtler,et al. Cleaning of raw peptide MS/MS spectra: Improved protein identification following deconvolution of multiply charged peaks, isotope clusters, and removal of background noise , 2006, Proteomics.
[2] William Stafford Noble,et al. Non-parametric estimation of posterior error probabilities associated with peptides identified by tandem mass spectrometry , 2008, ECCB.
[3] D. N. Perkins,et al. Probability‐based protein identification by searching sequence databases using mass spectrometry data , 1999, Electrophoresis.
[4] Ronald J Moore,et al. Proteome-wide identification of proteins and their modifications with decreased ambiguities and improved false discovery rates using unique sequence tags. , 2008, Analytical chemistry.
[5] S. Bryant,et al. Assessing data quality of peptide mass spectra obtained by quadrupole ion trap mass spectrometry. , 2005, Journal of proteome research.
[6] Mikhail M Savitski,et al. New Data Base-independent, Sequence Tag-based Scoring of Peptide MS/MS Data Validates Mowse Scores, Recovers Below Threshold Data, Singles Out Modified Peptides, and Assesses the Quality of MS/MS Techniques* , 2005, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.
[7] Alexey I Nesvizhskii,et al. Analysis and validation of proteomic data generated by tandem mass spectrometry , 2007, Nature Methods.
[8] Alexey I Nesvizhskii,et al. Empirical statistical model to estimate the accuracy of peptide identifications made by MS/MS and database search. , 2002, Analytical chemistry.
[9] Hyungwon Choi,et al. Semisupervised model-based validation of peptide identifications in mass spectrometry-based proteomics. , 2008, Journal of proteome research.
[10] Lang Li,et al. A hierarchical statistical model to assess the confidence of peptides and proteins inferred from tandem mass spectrometry , 2008, Bioinform..
[11] Roger E. Moore,et al. Qscore: An algorithm for evaluating SEQUEST database search results , 2002, Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry.
[12] T. Köcher,et al. Preprocessing of tandem mass spectrometric data to support automatic protein identification , 2003, Proteomics.
[13] Nikola S Mueller,et al. Interrogation of MS/MS search data with an pI Filter algorithm to increase protein identification success , 2007, Electrophoresis.
[14] E. Kolker,et al. Spectral quality assessment for high-throughput tandem mass spectrometry proteomics. , 2004, Omics : a journal of integrative biology.
[15] Chris F. Taylor,et al. A common open representation of mass spectrometry data and its application to proteomics research , 2004, Nature Biotechnology.
[16] Patrice Waridel,et al. Rapid validation of protein identifications with the borderline statistical confidence via de novo sequencing and MS BLAST searches. , 2006, Journal of proteome research.
[17] P. Pevzner,et al. Spectral probabilities and generating functions of tandem mass spectra: a strike against decoy databases. , 2008, Journal of proteome research.
[18] J. Yates,et al. Large-scale analysis of the yeast proteome by multidimensional protein identification technology , 2001, Nature Biotechnology.
[19] Eunok Paek,et al. Quality assessment of tandem mass spectra based on cumulative intensity normalization. , 2006, Journal of proteome research.
[20] Marshall W. Bern,et al. Automatic Quality Assessment of Peptide Tandem Mass Spectra , 2004, ISMB/ECCB.
[21] M. Vannucci,et al. A novel wavelet‐based thresholding method for the pre‐processing of mass spectrometry data that accounts for heterogeneous noise , 2008, Proteomics.
[22] J. Yates,et al. An approach to correlate tandem mass spectral data of peptides with amino acid sequences in a protein database , 1994, Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry.
[23] Richard D. Smith,et al. Clustering millions of tandem mass spectra. , 2008, Journal of proteome research.
[24] William Stafford Noble,et al. Assigning significance to peptides identified by tandem mass spectrometry using decoy databases. , 2008, Journal of proteome research.
[25] Qunhua Li,et al. Modes of inference for evaluating the confidence of peptide identifications. , 2008, Journal of proteome research.
[26] S. Hanash. Disease proteomics : Proteomics , 2003 .
[27] B. Searle,et al. Improving sensitivity by probabilistically combining results from multiple MS/MS search methodologies. , 2008, Journal of proteome research.
[28] Ying Xu,et al. A computational method for assessing peptide‐ identification reliability in tandem mass spectrometry analysis with SEQUEST , 2004 .
[29] Lennart Martens,et al. Implementation and application of a versatile clustering tool for tandem mass spectrometry data , 2007, Proteomics.
[30] Albert Sickmann,et al. Extractor for ESI quadrupole TOF tandem MS data enabled for high throughput batch processing , 2004, BMC Bioinformatics.
[31] Jianqi Li,et al. A new strategy to filter out false positive identifications of peptides in SEQUEST database search results , 2007, Proteomics.
[32] Tero Aittokallio,et al. Quality classification of tandem mass spectrometry data , 2006, Bioinform..
[33] Timo Miettinen,et al. Robust denoising of electrophoresis and mass spectrometry signals with minimum description length principle , 2004, FEBS letters.
[34] Ron Shamir,et al. Clustering Gene Expression Patterns , 1999, J. Comput. Biol..
[35] Hyungwon Choi,et al. False discovery rates and related statistical concepts in mass spectrometry-based proteomics. , 2008, Journal of proteome research.
[36] Steven P Gygi,et al. Target-decoy search strategy for increased confidence in large-scale protein identifications by mass spectrometry , 2007, Nature Methods.
[37] Kai A Reidegeld,et al. An easy‐to‐use Decoy Database Builder software tool, implementing different decoy strategies for false discovery rate calculation in automated MS/MS protein identifications , 2008, Proteomics.
[38] A. Nesvizhskii,et al. Experimental protein mixture for validating tandem mass spectral analysis. , 2002, Omics : a journal of integrative biology.
[39] I. Eidhammer,et al. Improving the reliability and throughput of mass spectrometry‐based proteomics by spectrum quality filtering , 2006, Proteomics.
[40] Rolf Danielsson,et al. Matched filtering with background suppression for improved quality of base peak chromatograms and mass spectra in liquid chromatography - mass spectrometry , 2002 .
[41] William Stafford Noble,et al. A new algorithm for the evaluation of shotgun peptide sequencing in proteomics: support vector machine classification of peptide MS/MS spectra and SEQUEST scores. , 2003, Journal of proteome research.
[42] Richard E Higgs,et al. Estimating the statistical significance of peptide identifications from shotgun proteomics experiments. , 2007, Journal of proteome research.
[43] Keith Richardson,et al. Noise filtering techniques for electrospray quadrupole time of flight mass spectra , 2003, Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry.
[44] Ji Zhu,et al. Improved Classification of Mass Spectrometry Database Search Results Using Newer Machine Learning Approaches* , 2006, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.
[45] R. Aebersold,et al. Dynamic Spectrum Quality Assessment and Iterative Computational Analysis of Shotgun Proteomic Data , 2006, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.
[46] Ilan Beer,et al. Improving large‐scale proteomics by clustering of mass spectrometry data , 2004, Proteomics.