How to select outcome measurement instruments for outcomes included in a “Core Outcome Set” – a practical guideline
暂无分享,去创建一个
Caroline B. Terwee | Paula R. Williamson | Mike Clarke | Peter Tugwell | Maarten Boers | Michael R. Rose | Sunita Vohra | P. Tugwell | C. Terwee | P. Williamson | M. Boers | M. Clarke | S. Vohra | M. Rose | C. Prinsen | Cecilia A. C. Prinsen
[1] Caroline B. Terwee,et al. Self-report fatigue questionnaires in multiple sclerosis, Parkinson’s disease and stroke: a systematic review of measurement properties , 2011, Quality of Life Research.
[2] H. Williams,et al. The Harmonizing Outcome Measures for Eczema (HOME) roadmap: a methodological framework to develop core sets of outcome measurements in dermatology. , 2015, The Journal of investigative dermatology.
[3] Jane M Blazeby,et al. Developing core outcome sets for clinical trials: issues to consider , 2012, Trials.
[4] C. Terwee,et al. Development of a methodological PubMed search filter for finding studies on measurement properties of measurement instruments , 2009, Quality of Life Research.
[5] C. Terwee,et al. Measurement properties of performance-based measures to assess physical function in hip and knee osteoarthritis: a systematic review. , 2012, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.
[6] C. Terwee,et al. Psychometric properties of vision‐related quality of life questionnaires: a systematic review , 2004, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.
[7] C. Terwee,et al. Bioelectrical impedance analysis to estimate body composition in children and adolescents: a systematic review and evidence appraisal of validity, responsiveness, reliability and measurement error , 2013, Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity.
[8] C. Terwee,et al. The COSMIN checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties of health status measurement instruments: an international Delphi study , 2010, Quality of Life Research.
[9] C. Terwee,et al. Rating the methodological quality in systematic reviews of studies on measurement properties: a scoring system for the COSMIN checklist , 2011, Quality of Life Research.
[10] A. Carr,et al. Primary total hip replacement surgery: a systematic review of outcomes and modelling of cost-effectiveness associated with different prostheses. , 1998, Health technology assessment.
[11] C. Terwee,et al. The COSMIN study reached international consensus on taxonomy, terminology, and definitions of measurement properties for health-related patient-reported outcomes. , 2010, Journal of clinical epidemiology.
[12] D. Hunter,et al. Qualitative Research: Consensus methods for medical and health services research , 1995 .
[13] C. Terwee,et al. Core outcome domains for clinical trials in non-specific low back pain , 2015, European Spine Journal.
[14] P. Tugwell,et al. Developing core outcome measurement sets for clinical trials: OMERACT filter 2.0. , 2014, Journal of clinical epidemiology.
[15] D. Altman,et al. Choosing Important Health Outcomes For Comparative Effectiveness Research: A Systematic Review. , 2014, Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research.
[16] D. Spiegelhalter,et al. Consensus development methods, and their use in clinical guideline development. , 1998, Health technology assessment.
[17] E. Mohammadi,et al. Barriers and facilitators related to the implementation of a physiological track and trigger system: A systematic review of the qualitative evidence , 2017, International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care.
[18] C. Terwee,et al. Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. , 2007, Journal of clinical epidemiology.
[19] C. Terwee,et al. The Six-Minute Walk Test in Chronic Pediatric Conditions: A Systematic Review of Measurement Properties , 2012, Physical Therapy.
[20] H. Vet,et al. The Delphi list: a criteria list for quality assessment of randomized clinical trials for conducting systematic reviews developed by Delphi consensus. , 1998, Journal of clinical epidemiology.
[21] Douglas G. Altman,et al. Choosing Important Health Outcomes for Comparative Effectiveness Research: An Updated Review and User Survey , 2016, PloS one.
[22] C. Terwee,et al. Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials (COMET) initiative: protocol for an international Delphi study to achieve consensus on how to select outcome measurement instruments for outcomes included in a ‘core outcome set’ , 2014, Trials.
[23] S. V. Elsland,et al. Instruments to assess physical activity in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee: a systematic review of measurement properties. , 2011, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.
[24] P. Glasziou,et al. Avoidable waste in the production and reporting of research evidence , 2009, The Lancet.
[25] L. McLeod,et al. ISOQOL recommends minimum standards for patient-reported outcome measures used in patient-centered outcomes and comparative effectiveness research , 2013, Quality of Life Research.
[26] Mike Clarke,et al. Standardising outcomes for clinical trials and systematic reviews , 2007, Trials.
[27] L. Hartling,et al. Primary Outcomes Reporting in Trials (PORTal): a systematic review of inadequate reporting in pediatric randomized controlled trials. , 2017, Journal of clinical epidemiology.
[28] C B Terwee,et al. Assessing the quality of available patient reported outcome measures for intermittent claudication: a systematic review using the COSMIN checklist. , 2015, European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery.