Evaluating the Utility of EPIK in a Finger Tapping fMRI Experiment using BOLD Detection and Effective Connectivity

EPI with Keyhole (EPIK) is a hybrid imaging technique that overcomes many of the performance disadvantages associated with EPI. Previously, EPIK was shown to provide a higher temporal resolution and fewer image distortions than EPI whilst maintaining comparable performance for the detection of BOLD-based signals. This work carefully examines the putative enhanced sensitivity of EPIK in a typical fMRI setting by using a robust fMRI paradigm – visually guided finger tapping – to demonstrate the advantages of EPIK for fMRI at 3 T. The data acquired were directly compared to the community standard fMRI protocol using single-shot EPI to ascertain a clear comparison. Each sequence was optimised to offer its highest possible spatial resolution for a given set of imaging conditions, i.e., EPIK and EPI achieved an in-planar resolution of 2.08 × 2.08 mm2 with 32 slices and 3.13 × 3.13 mm2 with 36 slices, respectively. EPIK demonstrated a number of clear improvements, such as superior spatial resolution with favourable robustness against susceptibility artefacts. Both imaging sequences revealed robust activation within primary motor, premotor and visual regions, although significantly higher BOLD amplitudes were detected using EPIK within the primary and supplementary motor areas. Dynamic causal modelling, in combination with Bayesian model selection, identified identical winning models for EPIK and EPI data. Coupling parameters reflecting task-related modulations and the connectivity of fixed connections were comparably robust for both sequences. However, fixed connections from the left motor cortex to the right visual cortex were estimated as being significantly more robust for EPIK data.

[1]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Bayesian model selection for group studies — Revisited , 2014, NeuroImage.

[2]  M Zaitsev,et al.  Shared k‐space echo planar imaging with keyhole , 2001, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[3]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Dynamic causal modelling , 2003, NeuroImage.

[4]  Richard Bowtell,et al.  T2* measurements in human brain at 1.5, 3 and 7 T. , 2007, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[5]  Simon B. Eickhoff,et al.  A new SPM toolbox for combining probabilistic cytoarchitectonic maps and functional imaging data , 2005, NeuroImage.

[6]  Nadim Joni Shah,et al.  Parallel imaging acceleration of EPIK for reduced image distortions in fMRI , 2013, NeuroImage.

[7]  P. Boesiger,et al.  SENSE: Sensitivity encoding for fast MRI , 1999, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[8]  M Zaitsev,et al.  Dual-contrast echo planar imaging with keyhole: application to dynamic contrast-enhanced perfusion studies , 2005, Physics in medicine and biology.

[9]  N Jon Shah,et al.  High‐performance computing MRI simulations , 2010, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[10]  Klaus Scheffler,et al.  Functional MRI in human subjects with gradient‐echo and spin‐echo EPI at 9.4 T , 2014, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[11]  P. Mansfield Multi-planar image formation using NMR spin echoes , 1977 .

[12]  Robin M Heidemann,et al.  Generalized autocalibrating partially parallel acquisitions (GRAPPA) , 2002, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[13]  Seong Dae Yun,et al.  Whole-brain high in-plane resolution fMRI using accelerated EPIK for enhanced characterisation of functional areas at 3T , 2017, PloS one.

[14]  S J Riederer,et al.  Interleaved echo planar imaging on a standard MRI system , 1994, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[15]  J. Shimony,et al.  Resting-State fMRI: A Review of Methods and Clinical Applications , 2013, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[16]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Bayesian model selection for group studies , 2009, NeuroImage.

[17]  A. Schleicher,et al.  Two different areas within the primary motor cortex of man , 1996, Nature.

[18]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Comparing dynamic causal models , 2004, NeuroImage.

[19]  J. J. van Vaals,et al.  “Keyhole” method for accelerating imaging of contrast agent uptake , 1993, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[20]  Stephen M. Smith,et al.  Multiplexed Echo Planar Imaging for Sub-Second Whole Brain FMRI and Fast Diffusion Imaging , 2010, PloS one.

[21]  Kamil Ugurbil,et al.  A critical assessment of data quality and venous effects in sub-millimeter fMRI , 2019, NeuroImage.

[22]  Jason R. Tregellas,et al.  Enhancing the Detection of BOLD Signal in fMRI by Reducing the Partial Volume Effect , 2014, Comput. Math. Methods Medicine.

[23]  P. Batchelor,et al.  International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine , 1997 .

[24]  J. Cuppen,et al.  Reducing MR imaging time by one-sided reconstruction , 1987 .

[25]  Robert Turner,et al.  Compensation of susceptibility induced BOLD sensitivity losses in echo-planar fMRI imaging , 2001, NeuroImage.