Reaching for visual cues to depth: the brain combines depth cues differently for motor control and perception.
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Robert A Jacobs,et al. Bayesian integration of visual and auditory signals for spatial localization. , 2003, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.
[2] Simon J Watt,et al. Binocular cues are important in controlling the grasp but not the reach in natural prehension movements , 2000, Neuropsychologia.
[3] James M. Hillis,et al. Slant from texture and disparity cues: optimal cue combination. , 2004, Journal of vision.
[4] John P. Frisby,et al. Interaction of stereo, texture and outline cues in the shape perception of three-dimensional ridges , 1993, Vision Research.
[5] Michael S Landy,et al. Statistical decision theory and the selection of rapid, goal-directed movements. , 2003, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.
[6] Andrew Blake,et al. Shape from texture: Ideal observers and human psychophysics , 1993, Vision Research.
[7] Michael S. Landy,et al. Integration of stereopsis and motion shape cues , 1994, Vision Research.
[8] S. Gepshtein,et al. Viewing Geometry Determines How Vision and Haptics Combine in Size Perception , 2003, Current Biology.
[9] M. Goodale,et al. The visual brain in action , 1995 .
[10] F. Phillips,et al. The Perception of Scale-Dependent and Scale-Independent Surface Structure from Binocular Disparity, Texture, and Shading , 1998, Perception.
[11] D. Burr,et al. The Ventriloquist Effect Results from Near-Optimal Bimodal Integration , 2004, Current Biology.
[12] Melvyn A. Goodale,et al. The Effect of Pictorial Illusion on Prehension and Perception , 1998, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.
[13] David C. Knill,et al. Surface orientation from texture: ideal observers, generic observers and the information content of texture cues , 1998, Vision Research.
[14] Raymond H. Cuijpers,et al. Illusions in action: consequences of inconsistent processing of spatial attributes , 2002, Experimental Brain Research.
[15] Peter Dixon,et al. Dynamic effects of the Ebbinghaus illusion in grasping: Support for a planning/control model of action , 2002, Perception & psychophysics.
[16] R. Mausfeld,et al. Perception and the Physical World: Psychological and Philosophical Issues in Perception , 2002 .
[17] D. Knill,et al. Visuomotor sensitivity to visual information about surface orientation. , 2004, Journal of neurophysiology.
[18] J. Saunders,et al. Perception of 3D surface orientation from skew symmetry , 2001, Vision Research.
[19] M. Landy,et al. Statistical decision theory and trade-offs in the control of motor response. , 2003, Spatial vision.
[20] John P. Frisby,et al. Experiments on Stereo and Texture Cue Combination in Human Vision Using Quasi-Neutral Viewing , 1992 .
[21] M. Fahle,et al. P M Max−planck−institut Fü R Biologische Kybernetik the Eeects of Visual Illusions on Grasping , 1999 .
[22] J. Saunders,et al. Do humans optimally integrate stereo and texture information for judgments of surface slant? , 2003, Vision Research.
[23] A. Yuille,et al. Bayesian decision theory and psychophysics , 1996 .
[24] P. Dixon,et al. Dynamic illusion effects in a reaching task: evidence for separate visual representations in the planning and control of reaching. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[25] M. Fahle,et al. Grasping Visual Illusions: No Evidence for a Dissociation Between Perception and Action , 2000, Psychological science.
[26] Melvyn A. Goodale,et al. The role of binocular vision in prehension: a kinematic analysis , 1992, Vision Research.
[27] M. Goodale,et al. Size-contrast illusions deceive the eye but not the hand , 1995, Current Biology.
[28] S. Glover,et al. The role of vision in the on-line correction of illusion effects on action. , 2001, Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale.
[29] V. Franz,et al. Action does not resist visual illusions , 2001, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[30] Simon J Watt,et al. The visual control of reaching and grasping: binocular disparity and motion parallax. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[31] M. Ernst,et al. Humans integrate visual and haptic information in a statistically optimal fashion , 2002, Nature.
[32] Philip N. Sabes,et al. Multisensory Integration during Motor Planning , 2003, The Journal of Neuroscience.
[33] E. Johnston. Systematic distortions of shape from stereopsis , 1991, Vision Research.
[34] R. Jacobs,et al. Optimal integration of texture and motion cues to depth , 1999, Vision Research.
[35] Eli Brenner,et al. Size illusion influences how we lift but not how we grasp an object , 1996, Experimental Brain Research.
[36] M. A. Goodale,et al. The removal of binocular cues disrupts the calibration of grasping in patients with visual form agnosia , 1997, Experimental Brain Research.
[37] J. M. Foley. Binocular distance perception. , 1980, Psychological review.
[38] J. J. Denier van der Gon,et al. Integration of proprioceptive and visual position-information , 1999 .