Model-based whole-brain effective connectivity to study distributed cognition in health and disease

Abstract Neuroimaging techniques are increasingly used to study brain cognition in humans. Beyond their individual activation, the functional associations between brain areas have become a standard proxy to describe how information is distributed across the brain network. Among the many analysis tools available, dynamic models of brain activity have been developed to overcome the limitations of original connectivity measures such as functional connectivity. In particular, much effort has been devoted to the assessment of directional interactions between brain areas from their observed activity. This opinion article summarizes our recent approach to analyze fMRI data based on our whole-brain effective connectivity, which relies on the multivariate Ornstein-Uhlenbeck (MOU) and is thus referred to as MOU-EC. Meanwhile, we also discuss the pros and cons of its underlying assumptions with respect to other established approaches. Once tuned, the model provides a connectivity measure that reflects the dynamical state of BOLD activity obtained using fMRI, which can be used to explore the brain cognition. We focus on two important applications. First, as a connectivity measure, MOU-EC can be used to extract biomarkers for task-specific brain coordination, understood as the patterns of areas exchanging information. The multivariate nature of connectivity measures raises several challenges for whole-brain analysis, for which machine-learning tools presents some advantages over statistical testing. Second, we show how to interpret changes in MOU-EC connections in a collective and model-based manner, bridging with network analysis. To illustrate our framework, we use a dataset where subjects were recorded in two conditions, watching a movie and a black screen (referred to as rest). Our framework provides a comprehensive set of tools that open exciting perspectives for the study of distributed cognition, as well as neuropathologies.

[1]  Jason Weston,et al.  Gene Selection for Cancer Classification using Support Vector Machines , 2002, Machine Learning.

[2]  Ernesto Estrada,et al.  Communicability in complex networks. , 2007, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[3]  Guy B. Williams,et al.  Functional neuroimaging findings in healthy middle-aged adults at risk of Alzheimer’s disease , 2017, Ageing Research Reviews.

[4]  Jonathan D. Power,et al.  Ridding fMRI data of motion-related influences: Removal of signals with distinct spatial and physical bases in multiecho data , 2018, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[5]  Christine Bastin,et al.  Recognition of personally familiar faces and functional connectivity in Alzheimer's disease , 2015, Cortex.

[6]  Dimitri Van De Ville,et al.  Interactions Between Large-Scale Functional Brain Networks are Captured by Sparse Coupled HMMs , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[7]  Adeel Razi,et al.  A DCM for resting state fMRI , 2014, NeuroImage.

[8]  Viktor K. Jirsa,et al.  How do parcellation size and short-range connectivity affect dynamics in large-scale brain network models? , 2016, NeuroImage.

[9]  Gaël Varoquaux,et al.  Predictive models avoid excessive reductionism in cognitive neuroimaging , 2019, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[10]  M. Corbetta,et al.  A Cortical Core for Dynamic Integration of Functional Networks in the Resting Human Brain , 2012, Neuron.

[11]  Karthik Ramakrishnan Sreenivasan,et al.  Threat-related learning relies on distinct dorsal prefrontal cortex network connectivity , 2014, NeuroImage.

[12]  Antonello Baldassarre,et al.  Disruptions of network connectivity predict impairment in multiple behavioral domains after stroke , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[13]  B T Thomas Yeo,et al.  The modular and integrative functional architecture of the human brain , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[14]  L Barnett,et al.  Neural complexity and structural connectivity. , 2009, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[15]  Kevin Murphy,et al.  Neural correlates of the LSD experience revealed by multimodal neuroimaging , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[16]  Shun-ichi Amari,et al.  Natural Gradient Works Efficiently in Learning , 1998, Neural Computation.

[17]  Larry H Hollier,et al.  Review of "A Multi-Modal Parcellation of Human Cerebral Cortex" by Glasser M, Coalson TS, Robinson EC, Hacker CD, Harwell J, Yacoub E, Ugurbil K, Andersson J, Beckmann CF, Jenkinson M, Smith SM, Van Essen DC in Nature 536: 171-181, 2016. , 2017, The Journal of craniofacial surgery.

[18]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Large-scale DCMs for resting-state fMRI , 2017, Network Neuroscience.

[19]  Z Kourtzi,et al.  How structure sculpts function: Unveiling the contribution of anatomical connectivity to the brain's spontaneous correlation structure. , 2016, Chaos.

[20]  D. Mantini,et al.  Functional Connectivity in the Normal and Injured Brain , 2013, The Neuroscientist : a review journal bringing neurobiology, neurology and psychiatry.

[21]  Angela R. Laird,et al.  Networks of task co-activations , 2013, NeuroImage.

[22]  G. Edelman,et al.  Complexity and coherency: integrating information in the brain , 1998, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[23]  Joachim M. Buhmann,et al.  A generative model of whole-brain effective connectivity , 2018, NeuroImage.

[24]  Danielle S. Bassett,et al.  Modeling and interpreting mesoscale network dynamics , 2017, NeuroImage.

[25]  Luca Faes,et al.  On the interpretability and computational reliability of frequency-domain Granger causality , 2017, F1000Research.

[26]  Andres Hoyos Idrobo,et al.  Assessing and tuning brain decoders: Cross-validation, caveats, and guidelines , 2016, NeuroImage.

[27]  Biyu J. He Scale-Free Properties of the Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Signal during Rest and Task , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[28]  N. Logothetis,et al.  Neurophysiology of the BOLD fMRI Signal in Awake Monkeys , 2008, Current Biology.

[29]  V. Haughton,et al.  Mapping functionally related regions of brain with functional connectivity MR imaging. , 2000, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[30]  Mark W. Woolrich,et al.  Network modelling methods for FMRI , 2011, NeuroImage.

[31]  Viktor K. Jirsa,et al.  Mathematical framework for large-scale brain network modeling in The Virtual Brain , 2015, NeuroImage.

[32]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Modeling regional and psychophysiologic interactions in fMRI: the importance of hemodynamic deconvolution , 2003, NeuroImage.

[33]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Structural and Functional Brain Networks: From Connections to Cognition , 2013, Science.

[34]  Matthieu Gilson,et al.  Task-related effective connectivity reveals that the cortical rich club gates cortex-wide communication , 2017, bioRxiv.

[35]  Andrew T. Drysdale,et al.  Resting-state connectivity biomarkers define neurophysiological subtypes of depression , 2016, Nature Medicine.

[36]  Joaquín Goñi,et al.  The quest for identifiability in human functional connectomes , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[37]  R. Hughes Models and Representation , 1997, Philosophy of Science.

[38]  Andreas Bartels,et al.  fMRI and its interpretations: an illustration on directional selectivity in area V5/MT , 2008, Trends in Neurosciences.

[39]  William H. Thompson,et al.  Brain network segregation and integration during an epoch-related working memory fMRI experiment , 2018, NeuroImage.

[40]  G. Tononi,et al.  Rethinking segregation and integration: contributions of whole-brain modelling , 2015, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[41]  G Tononi,et al.  Theoretical neuroanatomy: relating anatomical and functional connectivity in graphs and cortical connection matrices. , 2000, Cerebral cortex.

[42]  Irène Buvat,et al.  Joint prediction of multiple scores captures better individual traits from brain images , 2017, NeuroImage.

[43]  Michele Benzi,et al.  Total communicability as a centrality measure , 2013, J. Complex Networks.

[44]  Patrice Abry,et al.  Interplay between functional connectivity and scale-free dynamics in intrinsic fMRI networks , 2014, NeuroImage.

[45]  Hartwig R. Siebner,et al.  The motor system and its disorders , 2012, NeuroImage.

[46]  Kaustubh Supekar,et al.  Multivariate dynamical systems models for estimating causal interactions in fMRI , 2011, NeuroImage.

[47]  Maurizio Corbetta,et al.  Identification of cerebral networks by classification of the shape of BOLD responses. , 2003, Journal of neurophysiology.

[48]  B. Sahakian,et al.  Default Mode Dynamics for Global Functional Integration , 2015, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[49]  Mitsuo Kawato,et al.  Computational neuroscience approach to biomarkers and treatments for mental disorders , 2017, Psychiatry and clinical neurosciences.

[50]  Matthieu Gilson,et al.  Extracting orthogonal subject- and condition-specific signatures from fMRI data using whole-brain effective connectivity , 2018, NeuroImage.

[51]  M. Raichle,et al.  Lag structure in resting-state fMRI. , 2014, Journal of neurophysiology.

[52]  Ben D. Fulcher,et al.  An evaluation of the efficacy, reliability, and sensitivity of motion correction strategies for resting-state functional MRI , 2017, NeuroImage.

[53]  Jean-Baptiste Poline,et al.  Atlases of cognition with large-scale human brain mapping , 2018, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[54]  R. F. Galán,et al.  On How Network Architecture Determines the Dominant Patterns of Spontaneous Neural Activity , 2008, PLoS ONE.

[55]  F. Gonzalez-Lima,et al.  Structural equation modeling and its application to network analysis in functional brain imaging , 1994 .

[56]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Nonlinear Responses in fMRI: The Balloon Model, Volterra Kernels, and Other Hemodynamics , 2000, NeuroImage.

[57]  Joachim M. Buhmann,et al.  Generative Embedding for Model-Based Classification of fMRI Data , 2011, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[58]  Matthieu Gilson,et al.  Effective connectivity inferred from fMRI transition dynamics during movie viewing points to a balanced reconfiguration of cortical interactions , 2017, NeuroImage.

[59]  Rainer Goebel,et al.  Investigating directed cortical interactions in time-resolved fMRI data using vector autoregressive modeling and Granger causality mapping. , 2003, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[60]  A. Villringer,et al.  How Ongoing Neuronal Oscillations Account for Evoked fMRI Variability , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[61]  Jörn Diedrichsen,et al.  Reliability of dissimilarity measures for multi-voxel pattern analysis , 2016, NeuroImage.

[62]  M. Corbetta,et al.  Inter-species activity correlations reveal functional correspondences between monkey and human brain areas , 2012, Nature Methods.

[63]  Natalia Z Bielczyk,et al.  Disentangling causal webs in the brain using functional magnetic resonance imaging: A review of current approaches , 2017, Network Neuroscience.

[64]  Jessica R. Cohen The behavioral and cognitive relevance of time-varying, dynamic changes in functional connectivity , 2017, NeuroImage.

[65]  R. Malach,et al.  Intersubject Synchronization of Cortical Activity During Natural Vision , 2004, Science.

[66]  John H. Gilmore,et al.  Network-Level Connectivity Dynamics of Movie Watching in 6-Year-Old Children , 2015, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[67]  Mark W. Woolrich,et al.  Discovering dynamic brain networks from big data in rest and task , 2017, NeuroImage.

[68]  Y. Benjamini,et al.  Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing , 1995 .

[69]  Abraham Z. Snyder,et al.  A brief history of the resting state: The Washington University perspective , 2012, NeuroImage.

[70]  Damien A. Fair,et al.  Connectotyping: Model Based Fingerprinting of the Functional Connectome , 2014, PloS one.

[71]  Dimitri Van De Ville,et al.  The dynamic functional connectome: State-of-the-art and perspectives , 2017, NeuroImage.

[72]  G. Varoquaux,et al.  Connectivity‐based parcellation: Critique and implications , 2015, Human brain mapping.

[73]  R. Parasuraman,et al.  Advice Taking from Humans and Machines: An fMRI and Effective Connectivity Study , 2016, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[74]  Peter Fransson,et al.  From static to temporal network theory: Applications to functional brain connectivity , 2017, Network Neuroscience.

[75]  D. Heeger,et al.  Linear Systems Analysis of Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Human V1 , 1996, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[76]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Task-Dependent Modulation of Effective Connectivity within the Default Mode Network , 2012, Front. Psychology.

[77]  S. Petersen,et al.  Development of distinct control networks through segregation and integration , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[78]  Gustavo Deco,et al.  Role of local network oscillations in resting-state functional connectivity , 2011, NeuroImage.

[79]  S. Dehaene,et al.  Towards a cognitive neuroscience of consciousness: basic evidence and a workspace framework , 2001, Cognition.

[80]  M. Sendtner,et al.  Molecular mechanisms in spinal muscular atrophy: models and perspectives , 2001, Current opinion in neurology.

[81]  Ernesto Estrada,et al.  Communicability in temporal networks. , 2013, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[82]  C. Segebarth,et al.  Identifying Neural Drivers with Functional MRI: An Electrophysiological Validation , 2008, PLoS biology.

[83]  Jonathan Touboul,et al.  The hemodynamic signal as a first-order low-pass temporal filter: Evidence and implications for neuroimaging studies , 2016, NeuroImage.

[84]  M. Chun,et al.  Functional connectome fingerprinting: Identifying individuals based on patterns of brain connectivity , 2015, Nature Neuroscience.

[85]  Karl J. Friston Functional and Effective Connectivity: A Review , 2011, Brain Connect..

[86]  J. Cowan,et al.  A mathematical theory of the functional dynamics of cortical and thalamic nervous tissue , 1973, Kybernetik.

[87]  P. Fries A mechanism for cognitive dynamics: neuronal communication through neuronal coherence , 2005, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[88]  R. Cameron Craddock,et al.  Exploratory structural equation modeling of resting-state fMRI: Applicability of group models to individual subjects , 2009, NeuroImage.

[89]  David M. Kaplan,et al.  Explanation and description in computational neuroscience , 2011, Synthese.

[90]  David A. Leopold,et al.  Dynamic functional connectivity: Promise, issues, and interpretations , 2013, NeuroImage.

[91]  Matthieu Gilson,et al.  Analysis of fMRI data using noise-diffusion network models: a new covariance-coding perspective , 2017, Biological Cybernetics.

[92]  Maurizio Corbetta,et al.  Functional connectivity in resting-state fMRI: Is linear correlation sufficient? , 2011, NeuroImage.

[93]  O. Sporns,et al.  Mapping the Structural Core of Human Cerebral Cortex , 2008, PLoS biology.

[94]  M E J Newman,et al.  Modularity and community structure in networks. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[95]  J. Kurths,et al.  Exploring Brain Function from Anatomical Connectivity , 2011, Front. Neurosci..

[96]  Arne D. Ekstrom,et al.  How and when the fMRI BOLD signal relates to underlying neural activity: The danger in dissociation , 2010, Brain Research Reviews.

[97]  A. Seth,et al.  Granger causality for state-space models. , 2015, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[98]  M. Breakspear Dynamic models of large-scale brain activity , 2017, Nature Neuroscience.

[99]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Stochastic dynamic causal modelling of fMRI data: Should we care about neural noise? , 2012, NeuroImage.

[100]  Michael Erb,et al.  Linking structural and effective brain connectivity: structurally informed Parametric Empirical Bayes (si-PEB) , 2018, Brain Structure and Function.

[101]  Matthieu Gilson,et al.  Distinct modes of functional connectivity induced by movie-watching , 2019, NeuroImage.

[102]  Bharat B. Biswal,et al.  Resting state fMRI: A personal history , 2012, NeuroImage.

[103]  Dick J. Veltman,et al.  Evaluating the evidence for biotypes of depression: attempted replication of Drysdale et.al. 2017 , 2018, bioRxiv.

[104]  Olaf Sporns,et al.  The Human Connectome: A Structural Description of the Human Brain , 2005, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[105]  G. Edelman,et al.  A measure for brain complexity: relating functional segregation and integration in the nervous system. , 1994, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[106]  Olaf Sporns,et al.  Network structure of cerebral cortex shapes functional connectivity on multiple time scales , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[107]  A. Wagner,et al.  Sources of Method Bias in Social Science Research and Recommendations on How to Control It , 2015 .

[108]  Maurizio Corbetta,et al.  Resting-State Functional Connectivity Emerges from Structurally and Dynamically Shaped Slow Linear Fluctuations , 2013, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[109]  Michael Eickenberg,et al.  Machine learning for neuroimaging with scikit-learn , 2014, Front. Neuroinform..

[110]  Adeel Razi,et al.  Dynamic effective connectivity in resting state fMRI , 2017, NeuroImage.

[111]  Morten L. Kringelbach,et al.  Hierarchy of Information Processing in the Brain: A Novel ‘Intrinsic Ignition’ Framework , 2017, Neuron.

[112]  P. Rousseeuw Silhouettes: a graphical aid to the interpretation and validation of cluster analysis , 1987 .

[113]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Dynamic causal modelling , 2003, NeuroImage.

[114]  Matthieu Gilson,et al.  Analysis of brain network dynamics estimated from fMRI data: A new framework based on communicability and flow , 2018, bioRxiv.

[115]  M. V. D. Heuvel,et al.  Exploring the brain network: A review on resting-state fMRI functional connectivity , 2010, European Neuropsychopharmacology.

[116]  Randy L Buckner,et al.  Human functional connectivity: New tools, unresolved questions , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[117]  Enzo Tagliazucchi,et al.  Propagated infra-slow intrinsic brain activity reorganizes across wake and slow wave sleep , 2015, eLife.

[118]  Gustavo Deco,et al.  Structural connectivity allows for multi-threading during rest: The structure of the cortex leads to efficient alternation between resting state exploratory behavior and default mode processing , 2012, NeuroImage.

[119]  Habib Benali,et al.  Relating Structure and Function in the Human Brain: Relative Contributions of Anatomy, Stationary Dynamics, and Non-stationarities , 2014, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[120]  Olaf Sporns,et al.  Communication dynamics in complex brain networks , 2017, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[121]  Andrew W. Kraft,et al.  Spontaneous Infra-slow Brain Activity Has Unique Spatiotemporal Dynamics and Laminar Structure , 2018, Neuron.

[122]  K. Ohki,et al.  Neuronal orig in of the temporal dynamics of spontaneous BOLD activity correlation , 2017, bioRxiv.

[123]  Gustavo Deco,et al.  Cognitive performance in healthy older adults relates to spontaneous switching between states of functional connectivity during rest , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[124]  Kevin Whittingstall,et al.  Assessment of Effective Connectivity and Plasticity With Dual-Coil Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation , 2016, Brain Stimulation.

[125]  Matthieu Gilson,et al.  Estimation of Directed Effective Connectivity from fMRI Functional Connectivity Hints at Asymmetries of Cortical Connectome , 2016, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[126]  Luke J. Chang,et al.  A Sensitive and Specific Neural Signature for Picture-Induced Negative Affect , 2015, PLoS biology.

[127]  Stefan Rotter,et al.  From correlation to causation: Estimating effective connectivity from zero-lag covariances of brain signals , 2017, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[128]  Viviana Betti,et al.  Natural Scenes Viewing Alters the Dynamics of Functional Connectivity in the Human Brain , 2013, Neuron.

[129]  Edward T. Bullmore,et al.  Brain functional connectivity in stimulant drug dependence and obsessive–compulsive disorder , 2012, NeuroImage.

[130]  G Deco,et al.  Framework based on communicability and flow to analyze complex network dynamics. , 2018, Physical review. E.

[131]  R Cameron Craddock,et al.  A whole brain fMRI atlas generated via spatially constrained spectral clustering , 2012, Human brain mapping.

[132]  Mark D'Esposito,et al.  Variation of BOLD hemodynamic responses across subjects and brain regions and their effects on statistical analyses , 2004, NeuroImage.

[133]  Morten L. Kringelbach,et al.  Functional complexity emerging from anatomical constraints in the brain: the significance of network modularity and rich-clubs , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[134]  Anil K. Seth,et al.  Granger causality analysis of fMRI BOLD signals is invariant to hemodynamic convolution but not downsampling , 2013, NeuroImage.

[135]  Jack L. Gallant,et al.  Encoding and decoding in fMRI , 2011, NeuroImage.

[136]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Effective connectivity: Influence, causality and biophysical modeling , 2011, NeuroImage.

[137]  Peter A. Bandettini,et al.  Task-based dynamic functional connectivity: Recent findings and open questions , 2017, NeuroImage.

[138]  C. Werner,et al.  Resting-state connectivity in neurodegenerative disorders: Is there potential for an imaging biomarker? , 2018, NeuroImage: Clinical.

[139]  P. Matthews,et al.  Clinical Concepts Emerging from fMRI Functional Connectomics , 2016, Neuron.

[140]  M. Greicius Resting-state functional connectivity in neuropsychiatric disorders , 2008, Current opinion in neurology.

[141]  Y. Benjamini,et al.  Controlling the false discovery rate in behavior genetics research , 2001, Behavioural Brain Research.

[142]  Vince D. Calhoun,et al.  Prediction of Individual Differences from Neuroimaging Data , 2017, NeuroImage.

[143]  Vince D. Calhoun,et al.  A review of group ICA for fMRI data and ICA for joint inference of imaging, genetic, and ERP data , 2009, NeuroImage.

[144]  Claus C. Hilgetag,et al.  Cytoarchitectural differences are a key determinant of laminar projection origins in the visual cortex , 2010, NeuroImage.

[145]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Analysing connectivity with Granger causality and dynamic causal modelling , 2013, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[146]  Jesper Andersson,et al.  A multi-modal parcellation of human cerebral cortex , 2016, Nature.

[147]  Markus Diesmann,et al.  Multi-scale account of the network structure of macaque visual cortex , 2017, Brain Structure and Function.

[148]  Guy B. Williams,et al.  Accurate autocorrelation modeling substantially improves fMRI reliability , 2017, Nature Communications.

[149]  Bruce R. Rosen,et al.  Ultra-Slow Single-Vessel BOLD and CBV-Based fMRI Spatiotemporal Dynamics and Their Correlation with Neuronal Intracellular Calcium Signals , 2018, Neuron.

[150]  M K Habib,et al.  Dynamics of neuronal firing correlation: modulation of "effective connectivity". , 1989, Journal of neurophysiology.

[151]  D. Pandya,et al.  Cerebral White Matter — Historical Evolution of Facts and Notions Concerning the Organization of the Fiber Pathways of the Brain , 2007, Journal of the history of the neurosciences.

[152]  Anthony N. Burkitt,et al.  A Review of the Integrate-and-fire Neuron Model: I. Homogeneous Synaptic Input , 2006, Biological Cybernetics.

[153]  Laura C. Buchanan,et al.  Tracking ongoing cognition in individuals using brief, whole-brain functional connectivity patterns , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[154]  David K. Menon,et al.  Default mode contributions to automated information processing , 2017, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[155]  G. Deco,et al.  Emerging concepts for the dynamical organization of resting-state activity in the brain , 2010, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[156]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Biophysical models of fMRI responses , 2004, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[157]  K. Sathian,et al.  Neural Changes with Tactile Learning Reflect Decision-Level Reweighting of Perceptual Readout , 2013, The Journal of Neuroscience.