Genetics Selection Evolution Effects of Pedigree Errors on the Efficiency of Conservation Decisions

Conservation schemes often aim at increasing genetic diversity by minimizing kinship, and the best method to achieve this goal, when pedigree data is available, is to apply optimal contributions. Optimal contributions calculate contributions per animal so that the weighted average mean kinship among candidate parents is minimized. This approach assumes that pedigree data is correct and complete. However, in practice, pedigrees often contain errors: parents are recorded incorrectly or even missing. We used simulations to investigate the effect of these two types of errors on minimizing kinship. Our findings show that a low percentage of wrong parent information reduces the effect of optimal contributions. When the percentage of wrong parent information is above 15%, the population structure and type of errors, should be taken into account before applying optimal contributions. Optimal contributions based on pedigrees with missing parent information hampers conservation of genetic diversity; however, missing parent information can be corrected. It is crucial to know which animals are founders. We strongly recommend that pedigree registration include whether missing parents are either true founders or non-founders.

[1]  J. Woolliams,et al.  Optimisation of contribution of candidate parents to maximise genetic gain and restricting inbreeding using semidefinite programming (Open Access publication) , 2007, Genetics Selection Evolution.

[2]  T. Meuwissen,et al.  Minimization of rate of inbreeding for small populations with overlapping generations. , 2001, Genetical research.

[3]  G. Brem,et al.  History of Lipizzan horse maternal lines as revealed by mtDNA analysis , 2002, Genetics Selection Evolution.

[4]  John B. Cole,et al.  PyPedal: A computer program for pedigree analysis , 2007 .

[5]  Jonathan D. Ballou,et al.  Introduction to Conservation Genetics: Frontmatter , 2010 .

[6]  J. Bennewitz,et al.  Wrong and missing sire information affects genetic gain in the Angeln dairy cattle population. , 2006, Journal of dairy science.

[7]  Piter Bijma,et al.  Estimating Relatedness Between Individuals in General Populations With a Focus on Their Use in Conservation Programs , 2006, Genetics.

[8]  C. E. Terrill,et al.  Systematic procedures for calculating inbreeding coefficients. , 1949, The Journal of heredity.

[9]  P. Visscher,et al.  Estimation of pedigree errors in the UK dairy population using microsatellite markers and the impact on selection. , 2002, Journal of dairy science.

[10]  J. Weller,et al.  Analysis of vaginal swabs for paternity testing and marker-assisted selection in cattle. , 2003, Journal of dairy science.

[11]  S. Thompson,et al.  Strategic planning for captive populations: projecting changes in genetic diversity , 2004 .

[12]  T. Meuwissen Maximizing the response of selection with a predefined rate of inbreeding. , 1997, Journal of animal science.

[13]  John B. Cole,et al.  Application note: PyPedal: A computer program for pedigree analysis , 2007 .

[14]  N. Cockett,et al.  Use of DNA Markers to Determine Paternity in a Multiple-Sire Mating Flock , 2003 .

[15]  M. Gilpin,et al.  Population management for survival and recovery : analytical methods and strategies in small population conservation , 1996 .

[16]  Robert C. Lacy,et al.  Analysis of founder representation in pedigrees: Founder equivalents and founder genome equivalents , 1989 .

[17]  J. Ballou,et al.  Ancestral inbreeding only minimally affects inbreeding depression in mammalian populations. , 1997, The Journal of heredity.

[18]  W. Foote,et al.  Protein polymorphism in sheep pedigree testing. , 1990 .

[19]  R. Spelman Utilisation of molecular information in dairy cattle breeding. , 2002 .

[20]  A. Caballero,et al.  Fixed contributions designs vs. minimization of global coancestry to control inbreeding in small populations. , 2003, Genetics.

[21]  Gerd Gigerenzer,et al.  Communicating Statistical Information , 2000, Science.

[22]  P. VanRaden,et al.  Accounting for Inbreeding and Crossbreeding in Genetic Evaluation of Large Populations , 1992 .

[23]  M. Groenen,et al.  Assessing the contribution of breeds to genetic diversity in conservation schemes , 2002, Genetics Selection Evolution.

[24]  H. Bovenhuis,et al.  Estimation of milk protein gene frequencies in crossbred cattle by maximum likelihood. , 1991, Journal of dairy science.

[25]  J. Weller,et al.  Factors affecting incorrect paternity assignment in the Israeli Holstein population. , 2004, Journal of dairy science.

[26]  J. Woolliams,et al.  Minimizing inbreeding by managing genetic contributions across generations. , 2003, Genetics.

[27]  A. Caballero,et al.  Interrelations between effective population size and other pedigree tools for the management of conserved populations. , 2000, Genetical research.