Effects of numerical formulation on magnetic field computation using meshless methods

Meshless methods have some advantages over their counterparts such as the finite-element method (FEM). However, existing meshless methods for computational electromagnetic fields are still not as efficient as FEM. In this paper, we compare two meshless methods of discretizing the computational domain of Poisson-like problems; namely, the point collocation and Galerkin methods (which use the strong and weak forms of the governing equation respectively), and their effects on the computational accuracy and efficiency of the magnetic fields. We also discuss methods of handling discontinuities at the material interface. We present several examples, which also provide a means to validate and evaluate both meshless methods. Exact solutions and/or FEM are used as a basis for comparison. In addition, we also verify the results by comparing computed magnetic forces against those measured experimentally

[1]  B. Shanker,et al.  Element-free Galerkin method for static and quasi-static electromagnetic field computation , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics.

[2]  J. Monaghan,et al.  Smoothed particle hydrodynamics: Theory and application to non-spherical stars , 1977 .

[3]  Jiun-Shyan Chen,et al.  Large deformation analysis of rubber based on a reproducing kernel particle method , 1997 .

[4]  R. Mesquita,et al.  Moving least square reproducing kernel method for electromagnetic field computation , 1999 .

[5]  Shiyou Yang,et al.  Application of a meshless method in electromagnetics , 2001 .

[6]  T. Belytschko,et al.  Element‐free Galerkin methods , 1994 .

[7]  Yves Marechal,et al.  Some meshless methods for electromagnetic field computations , 1998 .

[8]  Do Wan Kim,et al.  Point collocation method based on the FMLSRK approximation for electromagnetic field analysis , 2004 .

[9]  G. R. Liu,et al.  1013 Mesh Free Methods : Moving beyond the Finite Element Method , 2003 .

[10]  E. Oñate,et al.  A FINITE POINT METHOD IN COMPUTATIONAL MECHANICS. APPLICATIONS TO CONVECTIVE TRANSPORT AND FLUID FLOW , 1996 .

[11]  Guizhi Xu,et al.  Improvement of the element-free Galerkin method for electromagnetic field calculation , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity.

[12]  Vlatko Cingoski,et al.  Element-free Galerkin method for electromagnetic field computations , 1998 .

[13]  L. Lucy A numerical approach to the testing of the fission hypothesis. , 1977 .

[14]  B. Nayroles,et al.  Generalizing the finite element method: Diffuse approximation and diffuse elements , 1992 .

[15]  Wing Kam Liu,et al.  Wavelet and multiple scale reproducing kernel methods , 1995 .

[16]  Brian Moran,et al.  Treatment of material discontinuity in the Element-Free Galerkin method , 1996 .

[17]  Shiyou Yang,et al.  A combined wavelet-element free Galerkin method for numerical calculations of electromagnetic fields , 2003 .

[18]  S. Atluri,et al.  A new Meshless Local Petrov-Galerkin (MLPG) approach in computational mechanics , 1998 .

[19]  Hermann A. Haus,et al.  Electromagnetic Fields And Energy , 1989 .

[20]  Mark A Fleming,et al.  Meshless methods: An overview and recent developments , 1996 .

[21]  Do Wan Kim,et al.  Point collocation method based on the FMLSRK approximation for electromagnetic field analysis , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics.