Peer e-tutoring: Effects on students’ participation and interaction style in online courses

Abstract In this paper, we describe a procedure to promote active participation in online courses by supporting students in performing the role of an e-Tutor during group activities. A case study, conducted to explore the procedural effects both on students’ interactions and on their perceptions about the role, is discussed. Eighteen university students (67% female, mean Age = 23 years) took part in online collaborative learning activities as part of a 15-week blended learning course. Twelve participants took turns in covering the role of e-Tutor. Findings were based on a mixed methods analysis of 7105 contributions posted online by the 18 students. An analysis of e-Tutor self-assessment forms was also considered. Results indicated that utilising peer-based e-Tutors promoted substantial active participation in online discussions. Moreover, students performing the role of e-Tutor adopted a supportive, collaborative and educational style, which was maintained even after their turn as e-Tutor had ended.

[1]  Nadia Sansone,et al.  Structure of a Blended University Course: Applying Constructivist Principles to Blended Teaching , 2009 .

[2]  M. B. Ligorio,et al.  Blending Educational Models to Design Blended Activities , 2011 .

[3]  A. Strauss,et al.  Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. , 1992 .

[4]  Pierre Dillenbourg,et al.  Over-scripting CSCL: The risks of blending collaborative learning with instructional design , 2002 .

[5]  Michael J. Evans,et al.  Peer tutoring with the aid of the Internet , 2013, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[6]  Birgitta Kopp,et al.  E-tutorial support for collaborative online learning: An explorative study on experienced and inexperienced e-tutors , 2012, Comput. Educ..

[7]  James G. R. Cronin,et al.  Critical survey of information technology use in higher education: blended classrooms , 2009 .

[8]  Gilly Salmon,et al.  E-moderating: the key to teaching and learning online , 2003 .

[9]  John Cochenour,et al.  Building learning communities: facilitating interaction in computer mediated online courses , 2008 .

[10]  M. Chi.  Quantifying Qualitative Analyses of Verbal Data: A Practical Guide , 1997 .

[11]  U. Kelle.  Combining qualitative and quantitative methods in research practice: purposes and advantages , 2006 .

[12]  M. J. Edwards,et al.  The making of an exemplary online educator , 2011 .

[13]  Pamela Jordan.  Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques , 1994 .

[14]  Jan-Willem Strijbos,et al.  The effect of functional roles on perceived group efficiency during computer-supported collaborative learning: a matter of triangulation , 2007, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[15]  Kimberly J. Vannest,et al.  Academic Benefits of Peer Tutoring: A Meta-Analytic Review of Single-Case Research , 2013 .

[16]  Clark Aldrich,et al.  Learning by Doing: A Comprehensive Guide to Simulations, Computer Games, and Pedagogy in e-Learning and Other Educational Experiences , 2005 .

[17]  Frank Fischer,et al.  Internal and external scripts in computer-supported collaborative inquiry learning , 2007, Learning and Instruction.

[18]  Keith J. Topping,et al.  Peer assisted learning: a practical guide for teachers , 2001 .

[19]  F. Fischer,et al.  Toward a Script Theory of Guidance in Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning , 2013, Educational psychologist.