Preventing disability from work-related low-back pain. New evidence gives new hope--if we can just get all the players onside.

Despite the publication in the mid-1990s of comprehensive practice guidelines for the management of acute low-back pain, both in the United States and elsewhere, this ubiquitous health problem continues to be the main cause of workers' compensation claims in much of the Western world. This paper represents a synthesis of the intervention studies published in the last 4 years and is based on a new approach to categorizing these studies that emphasizes the stage or phase of back pain at the time of intervention and the site or agent of the intervention. Current thinking suggests that medical management in the first 3-4 weeks after the onset of pain should be generally conservative. Several studies of rather heterogeneous interventions focusing on return to work and implemented in the subacute stage (3-4 to 12 weeks after the onset of pain) have shown important reductions in time lost from work (by 30% to 50%). There is substantial evidence indicating that employers who promptly offer appropriately modified duties can reduce time lost per episode of back pain by at least 30%, with frequent spin-off effects on the incidence of new back-pain claims as well. Finally, newer studies of guidelines-based approaches to back pain in the workplace suggest that a combination of all these approaches, in a coordinated workplace-linked care system, can achieve a reduction of 50% in time lost due to back pain, at no extra cost and, in some settings, with significant savings.

[1]  Samy Suissa,et al.  A Population‐Based, Randomized Clinical Trial on Back Pain Management , 1997, Spine.

[2]  S. Sinclair,et al.  The Effectiveness of an Early Active Intervention Program for Workers With Soft‐Tissue Injuries: The Early Claimant Cohort Study , 1997, Spine.

[3]  C M de Villiers,et al.  A New Clinical Model For The Treatment Of Acute Low Back Pain , 1997 .

[4]  Lex M. Bouter,et al.  Conservative Treatment of Acute and Chronic Nonspecific Low Back Pain: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials of the Most Common Interventions , 1997, Spine.

[5]  W E van der Weide,et al.  Vocational outcome of intervention for low-back pain. , 1997, Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health.

[6]  Kazimirski Jc Helping patients return to work , 1997 .

[7]  L. Bouter,et al.  Spinal Manipulation for Low Back Pain: An Updated Systematic Review of Randomized Clinical Trials , 1996, Spine.

[8]  A. Faas Exercises: Which Ones Are Worth Trying, for Which Patients, and When? , 1996, Spine.

[9]  R. Norman,et al.  Disability Resulting From Occupational Low Back Pain: Part II: What Do We Know About Secondary Prevention? A Review of the Scientific Evidence on Prevention After Disability Begins , 1996, Spine.

[10]  A. Yassi,et al.  Effect of an Early Intervention Program on the Relationship Between Subjective Pain and Disability Measures in Nurses With Low Back Injury , 1996, Spine.

[11]  L. Bouter,et al.  The effectiveness of chiropractic for treatment of low back pain: an update and attempt at statistical pooling. , 1996, Journal of manipulative and physiological therapeutics.

[12]  S. Anaya,et al.  A randomized trial of exercise therapy in patients with acute low back pain--efficacy on sickness absence. , 1996, Spine.

[13]  J. Garrett,et al.  The outcomes and costs of care for acute low back pain among patients seen by primary care practitioners, chiropractors, and orthopedic surgeons. The North Carolina Back Pain Project. , 1995, The New England journal of medicine.

[14]  A. Yassi,et al.  Early intervention for back-injured nurses at a large Canadian tertiary care hospital: an evaluation of the effectiveness and cost benefits of a two-year pilot project. , 1995, Occupational medicine.

[15]  A. W. Chavannes,et al.  A Randomized Trial of Exercise Therapy in Patients With Acute Low Back Pain: Efficacy on Sickness Absence , 1995, Spine.

[16]  T. Aro,et al.  The treatment of acute low back pain--bed rest, exercises, or ordinary activity? , 1995, The New England journal of medicine.

[17]  O. Johnell,et al.  Conservative Treatment of Acute Low Back Pain: A 5‐Year Follow‐up Study of Two Methods of Treatment , 1995, Spine.

[18]  A. Indahl,et al.  Good Prognosis for Low Back Pain When Left Untampered: A Randomized Clinical Trial , 1995, Spine.

[19]  R Simard,et al.  Management of occupational back pain: the Sherbrooke model. Results of a pilot and feasibility study. , 1994, Occupational and environmental medicine.

[20]  L. Bouter,et al.  The efficacy of back schools: a review of randomized clinical trials. , 1994, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[21]  D. Cherkin,et al.  Effects of Practice Style in Managing Back Pain , 1994, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[22]  C. Bombardier,et al.  Group Education Interventions for People With Low Back Pain: An Overview of the Literature , 1994, Spine.

[23]  D R Ragland,et al.  Occupational Disability Due to Low Back Pain: A New Interdisciplinary Classification Based on a Phase Model of Disability , 1994, Spine.

[24]  S. Boden,et al.  A quality-based protocol for management of musculoskeletal injuries. A ten-year prospective outcome study. , 1994, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[25]  S. Linton,et al.  A controlled study of the effects of an early intervention on acute musculoskeletal pain problems , 1993, Pain.

[26]  A. Nachemson,et al.  The effect of graded activity on patients with subacute low back pain: a randomized prospective clinical study with an operant-conditioning behavioral approach. , 1992, Physical therapy.

[27]  O. Johnell,et al.  Conservative Treatment of Acute Low-Back Pain: A Prospective Randomized Trial: McKenzie Method of Treatment Versus Patient Education in “Mini Back School” , 1990, Spine.

[28]  J. Gice,et al.  Return to work program in a hospital setting , 1989 .

[29]  M. Cousins International association for the study of pain , 1989, Pain.

[30]  D L Sackett,et al.  An assessment of clinically useful measures of the consequences of treatment. , 1988, The New England journal of medicine.

[31]  D. Taylor,et al.  Predicting outcome in acute low-back pain. , 1987, Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien.

[32]  D. J. Wood,et al.  Design and Evaluation of a Back Injury Prevention Program Within a Geriatric Hospital , 1987, Spine.

[33]  D. Taylor,et al.  Clinical trial of common treatments for low back pain in family practice. , 1985, British medical journal.

[34]  A. Nachemson Work for all. For those with low back pain as well. , 1983, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[35]  Berger Ra,et al.  Chelsea Back Program: one year later. , 1983 .

[36]  Berger Ra,et al.  Attitudinal change: the Chelsea back program. , 1982 .

[37]  A. A. Buerger,et al.  Spinal manipulation for low back pain. , 1981, JAMA.

[38]  G. Hardin,et al.  The Tragedy of the Commons , 1968, Green Planet Blues.

[39]  J. Eisenberg Agency for Health Care Policy and Research. , 1999, Medical care.

[40]  M. Leahy,et al.  Firm Characteristics and Workers’ Compensation Claims Incidence , 1993 .

[41]  D. Durbin,et al.  Workers' compensation insurance : claim costs, prices, and regulation , 1992 .

[42]  Karl H.E. Kroemer,et al.  Manual material handling : Understanding and preventing back trauma , 1989 .

[43]  C. Molgaard,et al.  Benefits of a back care and light duty health promotion program in a hospital setting , 1988, Journal of community health.

[44]  Scientific approach to the assessment and management of activity-related spinal disorders. A monograph for clinicians. Report of the Quebec Task Force on Spinal Disorders. , 1987, Spine.

[45]  R. Fletcher,et al.  Clinical Epidemiology: The Essentials , 1982 .