Power Participation in Digital Citizen Engagement in South African Local Government: The Case of MOBISAM

A lack of service delivery and accountability are two characteristic challenges of numerous municipalities (local government) in South Africa. MobiSAM was introduced as a collaborative effort between a local university, civil society, residents, and local government to grow digital citizen engagement, facilitate two-way communication between local government and its citizenry, and contribute to the improved provision of basic services. Through the course of the project, it became clear that power, with respect to knowledge, was at play in the interactions or lack thereof between local government and citizens. This work-in-progress paper begins the journey of exploration of the power/knowledge dynamics at play in the MobiSAM project (using the SECI model and the Power Cube) by unpacking and understanding the nature of knowledge processed in the project and the associated knowledge creation processes that ensued between the different project stakeholders over time. The influence of power in determining the effective transfer of knowledge between key stakeholders of the project, for capacity building and organisational learning has emerged as an important issue in need of thorough investigation and critical analysis. This work in progress paper presents the preliminary framing of the research findings on the phases associated with the interplay of knowledge and power in the MobiSAM project, which are: 1) Realisation, 2) Navigating Responsiveness, and 3) Emergence.

[1]  Maureen Henninger,et al.  Government information: Literacies, behaviours and practices , 2017, Gov. Inf. Q..

[2]  Andrea Cornwall,et al.  Challenging the Boundaries of the Possible: Participation, Knowledge and Power , 2006 .

[3]  B. Mathews,et al.  The impact of culture on the application of the SECI model , 2010 .

[4]  Ikujiro Nonaka,et al.  The knowledge-creating theory revisited: knowledge creation as a synthesizing process , 2003 .

[5]  J. Pettit,et al.  Practice guide: A Combined Approach to Political Economy and Power Analysis Discussion Note Prepared for the Swiss Development Cooperation , 2013 .

[6]  Meng Li,et al.  Why Nonaka highlights tacit knowledge: a critical review , 2003, J. Knowl. Manag..

[7]  Georg von Krogh,et al.  Perspective - Tacit Knowledge and Knowledge Conversion: Controversy and Advancement in Organizational Knowledge Creation Theory , 2009, Organ. Sci..

[8]  Caroline Pade-Khene.  Embedding knowledge transfer in digital citizen engagement in South Africa: Developing digital literacy , 2018, Reading & Writing.

[9]  Monika Davidekova,et al.  ICT Collaboration Tools for Virtual Teams in Terms of the SECI Model , 2017, Int. J. Eng. Pedagog..

[10]  J. Fox,et al.  When Does ICT-Enabled Citizen Voice Lead to Government Responsiveness? , 2016 .

[11]  Ingrid Siebörger,et al.  Communicative Ecologies and Mobile Phones: Forging a Way to Increased Citizen Engagement , 2017 .

[12]  B. Kogut,et al.  Exploring internal stickiness : Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm , 2007 .

[13]  Savita Bailur,et al.  Closing the Feedback Loop: Can Technology Bridge the Accountability Gap? , 2014 .

[14]  John Gaventa,et al.  Finding the Spaces for Change: A Power Analysis , 2006 .

[15]  Shomikho Raha,et al.  Opening the Black Box: The Contextual Drivers of Social Accountability , 2015 .

[16]  Michael D. Myers,et al.  A Set of Principles for Conducting and Evaluating Interpretive Field Studies in Information Systems , 1999, MIS Q..

[17]  B. Matolino,et al.  The end of ubuntu , 2013 .

[18]  John Gaventa,et al.  Applying power analysis: using the ‘powercube’ to explore forms, levels and spaces , 2019, Power, Empowerment and Social Change.

[19]  J. Rotmans,et al.  Power in Transition: An Interdisciplinary Framework to Study Power in Relation to Structural Change , 2009 .

[20]  P. Reddy,et al.  Operationalising an effective monitoring and evaluation system for local government: Considerations for best practice , 2017 .

[21]  Moti Zwilling,et al.  Knowledge Management Systems Support Seci Model of Knowledge-Creating Process , 2016 .

[22]  H. Thinyane,et al.  Stumbling at the start line: an analysis of factors affecting participation with local government in South Africa , 2013 .

[23]  Caroline Pade-Khene,et al.  Appropriating Digital Citizen Engagement in Resource Constrained Local Government Service Delivery: A Case Study in South Africa , 2020, IDIA.

[24]  I. Nonaka.  A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation , 1994 .

[25]  Steven Lukes,et al.  Power and the Battle for Hearts and Minds , 2005 .

[26]  Simon Sheikh.  The Production of Space , 1996 .

[27]  F. Cloete,et al.  Improving professionalism in South African local government , 2018 .

[28]  P. Heller.  Democratic Deepening in India and South Africa , 2009 .

[29]  Hannu Simola,et al.  The Effects of Power Mechanisms in Education: Bringing Foucault and Bourdieu Together , 2010 .

[30]  John Gaventa,et al.  Mapping the Outcomes of Citizen Engagement , 2012 .

[31]  D. Morgan.  Pragmatism as a Paradigm for Social Research , 2014 .

[32]  G. Walsham,et al.  Research on information systems in developing countries: Current landscape and future prospects , 2006 .