Quantitative Characterization of the Influence of the Nanoscale Morphology of Nanostructured Surfaces on Bacterial Adhesion and Biofilm Formation

Bacterial infection of implants and prosthetic devices is one of the most common causes of implant failure. The nanostructured surface of biocompatible materials strongly influences the adhesion and proliferation of mammalian cells on solid substrates. The observation of this phenomenon has led to an increased effort to develop new strategies to prevent bacterial adhesion and biofilm formation, primarily through nanoengineering the topology of the materials used in implantable devices. While several studies have demonstrated the influence of nanoscale surface morphology on prokaryotic cell attachment, none have provided a quantitative understanding of this phenomenon. Using supersonic cluster beam deposition, we produced nanostructured titania thin films with controlled and reproducible nanoscale morphology respectively. We characterized the surface morphology; composition and wettability by means of atomic force microscopy, X-ray photoemission spectroscopy and contact angle measurements. We studied how protein adsorption is influenced by the physico-chemical surface parameters. Lastly, we characterized Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus adhesion on nanostructured titania surfaces. Our results show that the increase in surface pore aspect ratio and volume, related to the increase of surface roughness, improves protein adsorption, which in turn downplays bacterial adhesion and biofilm formation. As roughness increases up to about 20 nm, bacterial adhesion and biofilm formation are enhanced; the further increase of roughness causes a significant decrease of bacterial adhesion and inhibits biofilm formation. We interpret the observed trend in bacterial adhesion as the combined effect of passivation and flattening effects induced by morphology-dependent protein adsorption. Our findings demonstrate that bacterial adhesion and biofilm formation on nanostructured titanium oxide surfaces are significantly influenced by nanoscale morphological features. The quantitative information, provided by this study about the relation between surface nanoscale morphology and bacterial adhesion points towards the rational design of implant surfaces that control or inhibit bacterial adhesion and biofilm formation.

[1]  H. C. van der Mei,et al.  Bacterial adhesion to modified polyurethanes , 2004 .

[2]  Elena P Ivanova,et al.  The influence of nano-scale surface roughness on bacterial adhesion to ultrafine-grained titanium. , 2010, Biomaterials.

[3]  B. Ersbøll,et al.  Quantification of biofilm structures by the novel computer program COMSTAT. , 2000, Microbiology.

[4]  Robert A Latour,et al.  Investigation of the effects of surface chemistry and solution concentration on the conformation of adsorbed proteins using an improved circular dichroism method. , 2009, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[5]  Lyndon F Cooper,et al.  Advancing dental implant surface technology--from micron- to nanotopography. , 2008, Biomaterials.

[6]  P. F. Nealey,et al.  Nanoscale topography of the basement membrane underlying the corneal epithelium of the rhesus macaque , 1999, Cell and Tissue Research.

[7]  R. J. Hunter Foundations of Colloid Science , 1987 .

[8]  P. Milani,et al.  Biocompatibility of cluster-assembled nanostructured TiO2 with primary and cancer cells. , 2006, Biomaterials.

[9]  Ronald M. Atlas,et al.  Handbook of microbiological media , 1993 .

[10]  Luca Giorgetti,et al.  The Effect of Surface Nanometre-Scale Morphology on Protein Adsorption , 2010, PloS one.

[11]  E. Amanatides,et al.  Staphylococcus epidermidis adhesion to He, He/O(2) plasma treated PET films and aged materials: contributions of surface free energy and shear rate. , 2008, Colloids and surfaces. B, Biointerfaces.

[12]  Megan S. Lord,et al.  Influence of nanoscale surface topography on protein adsorption and cellular response , 2010 .

[13]  N. Bresolin,et al.  Ex vivo expansion of human circulating myogenic progenitors on cluster-assembled nanostructured TiO2. , 2010, Biomaterials.

[14]  F. Rosei,et al.  Improving biocompatibility of implantable metals by nanoscale modification of surfaces: an overview of strategies, fabrication methods, and challenges. , 2009, Small.

[15]  P. Milani,et al.  Cluster-Assembled Nanostructured Titanium Oxide Films with Tailored Wettability , 2009 .

[16]  Robert N. Wenzel,et al.  Surface Roughness and Contact Angle. , 1949 .

[17]  Tj Collins Introduction to ImageJ for Light Microscopy , 2007, Microscopy and Microanalysis.

[18]  Paolo Milani,et al.  RAPID COMMUNICATION: A pulsed microplasma source of high intensity supersonic carbon cluster beams , 1999 .

[19]  P. Milani,et al.  Supersonic cluster beam deposition of nanostructured titania , 2003 .

[20]  Pasquale Emanuele Scopelliti,et al.  High-throughput tools for the study of protein-nanostructured surface interaction. , 2011, Combinatorial chemistry & high throughput screening.

[21]  A. Singh,et al.  Ti based biomaterials, the ultimate choice for orthopaedic implants – A review , 2009 .

[22]  E. Place,et al.  Complexity in biomaterials for tissue engineering. , 2009, Nature materials.

[23]  L Ploux,et al.  The interaction of cells and bacteria with surfaces structured at the nanometre scale. , 2010, Acta biomaterialia.

[24]  V. Migonney,et al.  Osteoblast functions on functionalized PMMA-based polymers exhibiting Staphylococcus aureus adhesion inhibition. , 2006, Biomaterials.

[25]  J B Xavier,et al.  Automated biofilm morphology quantification from confocal laser scanning microscopy imaging. , 2003, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[26]  E. C. Teague,et al.  Three-dimensional stylus profilometry☆ , 1982 .

[27]  Baikun Li,et al.  Bacterial adhesion to glass and metal-oxide surfaces. , 2004, Colloids and surfaces. B, Biointerfaces.

[28]  Thomas J Webster,et al.  The relationship between the nanostructure of titanium surfaces and bacterial attachment. , 2010, Biomaterials.

[29]  P. Milani,et al.  Cluster assembling of nanostructured carbon films , 2001 .

[30]  Paolo Milani,et al.  Cluster beam deposition: a tool for nanoscale science and technology , 2006 .

[31]  K. Whitehead,et al.  The effect of surface properties and application method on the retention of Pseudomonas aeruginosa on uncoated and titanium-coated stainless steel , 2007 .

[32]  P. Milani,et al.  Production and characterization of highly intense and collimated cluster beams by inertial focusing in supersonic expansions , 2001 .

[33]  J. Kivilahti,et al.  Bacterial Adherence to Titanium Surface Coated with Human Serum Albumin , 2005, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.

[34]  Marcus Textor,et al.  Titanium in Medicine : material science, surface science, engineering, biological responses and medical applications , 2001 .

[35]  Julian H. George,et al.  Exploring and Engineering the Cell Surface Interface , 2005, Science.

[36]  Christian Hannig,et al.  Nanomaterials in preventive dentistry. , 2010, Nature nanotechnology.

[37]  M. Salmerón-Sánchez,et al.  Cell-Protein-Material Interaction in Tissue Engineering , 2010 .

[38]  Joanna Verran,et al.  Retention of microbial cells in substratum surface features of micrometer and sub-micrometer dimensions. , 2005, Colloids and surfaces. B, Biointerfaces.

[39]  Pierre Layrolle,et al.  Cell interaction with nanopatterned surface of implants. , 2010, Nanomedicine.

[40]  P. Milani,et al.  The influence of the precursor clusters on the structural and morphological evolution of nanostructured TiO2 under thermal annealing , 2003 .

[41]  C. Wilkinson,et al.  The control of human mesenchymal cell differentiation using nanoscale symmetry and disorder. , 2007, Nature materials.

[42]  F. O'Valle,et al.  Role of wettability and nanoroughness on interactions between osteoblast and modified silicon surfaces. , 2011, Acta biomaterialia.

[43]  G. Vecchio,et al.  Impact of nanoscale topography on genomics and proteomics of adherent bacteria. , 2011, ACS nano.

[44]  Cameron J Wilson,et al.  Mediation of biomaterial-cell interactions by adsorbed proteins: a review. , 2005, Tissue engineering.

[45]  Richard P Sear,et al.  Heterogeneous nucleation in and out of pores. , 2006, Physical review letters.