Sources of variation in tonal alignment: Evidence from acoustic and kinematic data

Abstract This study is concerned with the alignment of f0 peaks in rising LH pitch accents in German, both in relation to acoustically defined segments, referred to as segmental anchors, as well as to dynamically defined speech gestures, referred to as articulatory anchors. The effects investigated were the effects of syllable structure (test words ˈCV:CV and ˈCVCV, where the test syllable is open or closed, respectively), dialectal background (the varieties of German spoken in Dusseldorf and Vienna), and accent status in the intonational hierarchy (prenuclear and nuclear accents). As reported for related languages, peaks in closed syllables tended to be later than those in open syllables. However, it was only in nuclear accents that those differences were systematic for all four speakers. Thus only limited support can be provided for an alignment with the syllable edge. Although there was a tendency for Southern varieties to have later peaks than Northern ones, as also found in previous studies, alignment latencies of individual speakers in the two dialectal groups overlapped. These results support a gradient view of dialectal variation in tonal alignment. In this view, dialectal differences are not represented symbolically. Rather, the rising accents used by speakers of both varieties can be adequately captured with one symbolic representation. When comparing prenuclear and nuclear accents, by contrast, differences were found which could be interpreted as discrete. Whereas nuclear accent peaks were anchored to the intervocalic consonant, prenuclear accent peaks were anchored to the following unstressed vowel. This anchor shift could clearly be observed both in the acoustic and articulatory records, reflecting a difference at the symbolic level, possibly in terms of an additional tone following the LH complex.

[1]  Bettina Braun,et al.  Effects of dialect and context on the realisation of German prenuclear accents , 2007 .

[2]  C. Browman,et al.  Some Notes on Syllable Structure in Articulatory Phonology , 1988, Phonetica.

[3]  Martine Grice,et al.  Prosodic marking of focus domains - categorical or gradient? , 2006, Speech Prosody 2006.

[4]  C. Browman,et al.  Papers in Laboratory Phonology: Tiers in articulatory phonology, with some implications for casual speech , 1990 .

[5]  Shrikanth S. Narayanan,et al.  Phrasal signatures in articulation , 2000 .

[6]  Y Xu,et al.  Consistency of Tone-Syllable Alignment across Different Syllable Structures and Speaking Rates , 1998, Phonetica.

[7]  Mariapaola D'Imperio,et al.  Effects of tonal alignment on lexical identification in Italian , 2007 .

[8]  W J Levelt,et al.  The Syllabic Structure of Spoken Words: Evidence from the Syllabification of Intervocalic Consonants , 1997, Language and speech.

[9]  Julia Hirschberg,et al.  Tonal alignment patterns in Spanish , 1995 .

[10]  Jonathan Harrington,et al.  Multi-level annotation in the Emu speech database management system , 2001, Speech Commun..

[11]  Astrid Schepman,et al.  Alignment of “Phrase Accent” Lows in Dutch Falling Rising Questions: Theoretical and Methodological Implications , 2005, Language and speech.

[12]  Mariapaola D'Imperio,et al.  The role of perception in defining tonal targets and their alignment , 2000 .

[13]  Yi Xu,et al.  Phonetic realization of focus in English declarative intonation , 2005, J. Phonetics.

[14]  Matthias Jilka,et al.  The influence of vowel quality features on peak alignment , 2007, INTERSPEECH.

[15]  D. Robert Ladd,et al.  On the phonetics and phonology of "segmental anchoring" of F0: evidence from German , 2004, J. Phonetics.

[16]  Pilar Prieto,et al.  COORDINATION PATTERNS BETWEEN PITCH MOVEMENTS AND ORAL GESTURES IN CATALAN , 2007 .

[17]  Amalia Arvaniti,et al.  On the place of phrase accents in intonational phonology , 2000, Phonology.

[18]  D. Robert Ladd,et al.  Prosodic correlates of contrastive and non-contrastive themes in German , 2003, INTERSPEECH.

[19]  D. Ladd,et al.  Phonological conditioning of peak alignment in rising pitch accents in Dutch. , 2000, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[20]  Antonis Botinis Intonation: Analysis, Modelling and Technology , 2000 .

[21]  Kim E. A. Silverman,et al.  The timing of prenuclear high accents in English , 1987 .

[22]  H. Loevenbruck,et al.  Anchored down in Anchorage: Syllable structure, rate, and segmental anchoring in French , 2005 .

[23]  J Caspers,et al.  Effects of Time Pressure on the Phonetic Realization of the Dutch Accent-Lending Pitch Rise and Fall , 1993, Phonetica.

[24]  Anne Wichmann,et al.  Discourse Constraints on F0 Peak Timing in English , 2000 .

[25]  Matthias Jilka,et al.  EFFECTS OF SYLLABLE STRUCTURE AND NUCLEAR PITCH ACCENTS ON PEAK ALIGNMENT: A CORPUS-BASED ANALYSIS , 2007 .

[26]  Carlos Gussenhoven,et al.  Intonation and interpretation: phonetics and phonology , 2002, Speech Prosody 2002.

[27]  Martine Grice,et al.  Articulatory and acoustic correlates of prenuclear and nuclear accents , 2006 .

[28]  Robin J. Lickley,et al.  Effects of vowel length and "right context" on the alignment of Dutch nuclear accents , 2006, J. Phonetics.

[29]  Martine Grice,et al.  Prenuclear Rises in Northern and Southern German , 2008 .

[30]  Francisco Torreira,et al.  The segmental anchoring hypothesis revisited: Syllable structure and speech rate effects on peak timing in Spanish , 2007, J. Phonetics.

[31]  E. Sievers Rhythmisch-melodische studien : Vorträge und Aufsätze , 1912 .

[32]  Martine Grice,et al.  Leading tones and downstep in English , 1995, Phonology.

[33]  Yosuke Igarashi,et al.  segmental anchoring of F0 under changes in speech rate: evidence from Russian , 2004, Speech Prosody 2004.

[34]  Peter Bell,et al.  Proceedings of Speech Prosody 2006 , 2006 .

[35]  D. Robert Ladd,et al.  Tonal Alignment and the Representation of Accentual Targets , 1995 .

[36]  D. Ladd,et al.  Stability of tonal alignment: the case of Greek prenuclear accents , 1998 .

[37]  Stefanie Shattuck-Hufnagel,et al.  The domain of realization of the L- phrase tone in American English , 2006 .

[38]  Yi Xu Articulatory Constraints and Tonal alignment , 2002 .

[39]  D. Ladd,et al.  Constant "segmental anchoring" of F0 movements under changes in speech rate. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[40]  Mariapaola D'Imperio,et al.  Are tones aligned with articulatory events? Evidence from Italian and French , 2007 .