Towards a sustainable business model for smartphones: Combining product-service systems with modularity

Based on the Sustainable Development Goals introduced by the United Nations and on the circular economy concept, ICT providers are adapting to become more sustainable. Some assess the CO2 emissions in the whole life cycle, while others propose to use renewable energies during manufacturing and assembling. In contrast with the current smartphone business models that rely on ongoing patterns of production and consumption, this paper proposes a more sustainable approach by combining product modularity, Product-Service Systems (PSS), and design for attachment. With a modular design, it becomes easier to repair the product or to replace parts, allowing for an extended lifespan. In combination with PSS, we propose that the modules, when no longer used by one customer, return to the market to be reused by another one. Lastly, we discuss the impact of the users’ behaviour through emotional bond, personalization, and technology appropriation as predictors of attachment to the product and consequently an extended lifespan. Through comparing case studies and using Life Cycle Assessment to calculate the CO2 equivalent emissions, we argue that our approach would directly reduce the environmental impact of the smartphone on the production phase, which accounts for most of the emissions throughout its life cycle. B. Penzenstadler, S. Easterbrook, C. Venters and S.I. Ahmed (eds.), ICT4S2018 (EPiC Series in Computing, vol. 52), pp. 82–99 Towards a sustainable business model for smartphones A. F. Schneider et al.

[1]  HERBERT A. SIMON,et al.  The Architecture of Complexity , 1991 .

[2]  Jens Malmodin,et al.  Life Cycle Assessment of a Smartphone , 2016 .

[3]  Gül E. Okudan Kremer,et al.  A systematic literature review of modular product design (MPD) from the perspective of sustainability , 2016 .

[4]  D. Maxwell,et al.  Developing sustainable products and services , 2003 .

[5]  William McDonough,et al.  Cradle to Cradle: Remaking the Way We Make Things , 2002 .

[6]  Arnaldo Camuffo,et al.  The Concept of Modularity in Management Studies: A Literature Review , 2009 .

[7]  Elif Mine Ercan Global Warming Potential of a Smartphone : Using Life Cycle Assessment Methodology , 2013 .

[8]  Rajib Sinha,et al.  Unintended Environmental Consequences of Improvement Actions: A Qualitative Analysis of Systems' Structure and Behavior , 2016 .

[9]  Jonathan Chapman,et al.  Design for (Emotional) Durability , 2009, Design Issues.

[10]  Martin Schymanietz,et al.  From Phonebloks to Google Project Ara. A Case Study of the Application of Sustainable Mass Customization , 2016 .

[11]  D. Teece Business Models, Business Strategy and Innovation , 2010 .

[12]  Callie W. Babbitt,et al.  Integrating Emotional Attachment and Sustainability in Electronic Product Design , 2013 .

[13]  Teresa Inés Cerratto,et al.  On Fairness & Sustainability: Motivating Change in the Networked Society , 2015, EnviroInfo/ICT4S.

[14]  Jacquetta Lee,et al.  Redefining scope: the true environmental impact of smartphones? , 2015, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[15]  Alexander Felfernig,et al.  An introduction to personalization and mass customization , 2017, Journal of Intelligent Information Systems.

[16]  Norberto Patrignani The Challenge of ICT Long-Term Sustainability , 2017 .

[17]  M. Güvendik,et al.  From Smartphone to Futurephone: Assessing the Environmental Impacts of Different Circular Economy Scenarios of a Smartphone Using LCA , 2014 .

[18]  Arild Berg,et al.  THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN USER AND PRODUCT: DURABLE DESIGN THROUGH PERSONALISATION , 2016 .

[19]  Jens Malmodin,et al.  Simplifying a life cycle assessment of a mobile phone , 2014, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[20]  Jacquetta Lee,et al.  What is ‘value’ and how can we capture it from the product value chain? , 2017 .

[21]  Etienne Lees-Perasso,et al.  Environmental labelling of mobile phones : LCA standardisation process , 2014, ICT4S.

[22]  Tomas Ekvall,et al.  LCA - A Fair and Cost Effective Way to Compare Two Products? , 1995 .

[23]  James Gaskin,et al.  I’m Proud of It: Consumer Technology Appropriation and Psychological Ownership , 2015 .

[24]  Ruth Mugge,et al.  Emotional bonding with personalised products , 2009 .

[25]  Fabián Echegaray,et al.  Consumers’ reactions to product obsolescence in emerging markets: the case of Brazil , 2016 .

[26]  Karsten Schischke,et al.  Modular products: Smartphone design from a circular economy perspective , 2016, 2016 Electronics Goes Green 2016+ (EGG).

[27]  Réjean Samson,et al.  Challenges and complexities in application of LCA approaches in the case of ICT for a sustainable future , 2014, ICT4S.

[28]  Jan Blom,et al.  Personalization: a taxonomy , 2000, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[29]  Elaine M. Huang,et al.  Addressing the Obsolescence of End-User Devices: Approaches from the Field of Sustainable HCI , 2014, ICT4S.

[30]  Maja van der Velden Design as Regulation - Opportunities and Limitations for Sustainable Mobile Phone Design , 2016, CaTaC.