Measuring Absorptive Capacity in High-Tech Companies

The objective of this article is to show how mixed methods can be used to develop a deeper understanding of the construct, absorptive capacity (AC). We used qualitative data from eight case studies to identify which types of AC knowledge firms have. Then we identified variables for measuring AC. We identified two types of AC: “technological” AC and “non-core” AC. Using a Karnaugh Map and a Fuzzy Logic Design, we developed a quantitative model to measure overall AC. By focusing on interpretive integration, our results from using both qualitative and quantitative methods yielded complementary rather than contradictory findings, and the goal of “knowing more” about AC was achieved.

[1]  Amy Jocelyn Glass,et al.  International technology transfer and the technology gap , 1998 .

[2]  I. Cockburn,et al.  Absorptive Capacity, Coauthoring Behavior, and the Organization of Research in Drug Discovery , 2003 .

[3]  Boris Durisin,et al.  Absorptive capacity: Valuing a reconceptualization , 2007 .

[4]  C. Perry,et al.  Comprehensive criteria to judge validity and reliability of qualitative research within the realism paradigm , 2000 .

[5]  J. Fleiss,et al.  Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. , 1979, Psychological bulletin.

[6]  Jon Nicholl,et al.  Integration and Publications as Indicators of "Yield" From Mixed Methods Studies , 2007 .

[7]  J. Morse.  Critical Issues in Qualitative Research Methods , 1993 .

[8]  S. Zahra,et al.  Absorptive Capacity: A Review, Reconceptualization, and Extension , 2002 .

[9]  Kent Eriksson,et al.  The effect of experience and absorptive capacity on foreign market knowledge , 2003 .

[10]  Wolfgang Keller,et al.  Absorptive capacity: On the creation and acquisition of technology in development , 1996 .

[11]  John W. Creswell,et al.  Editorial: Mixed Methodology Across Disciplines , 2008 .

[12]  A. Bryman.  Barriers to Integrating Quantitative and Qualitative Research , 2007 .

[13]  William B. Gartner,et al.  Introduction to the special issue on qualitative methods in entrepreneurship research , 2002 .

[14]  S. Albers,et al.  Crisis Construction and Organizational Learning: Capability Building in Catching-Up at Hyundai Motor , 1998 .

[15]  Robert W. Zmud,et al.  The Influence of IT Management Practice on IT Use in Large Organizations , 1994, MIS Q..

[16]  M. Hitt,et al.  International expansion by new venture firms: International diversity, mode of market entry, technological learning, and performance. , 2000 .

[17]  Peter J. Lane,et al.  Relative absorptive capacity and interorganizational learning , 1998 .

[18]  Sharlene Hesse-Biber,et al.  Coming at Things Differently , 2013 .

[19]  Daniel P. Sullivan.  Measuring the Degree of Internationalization of a Firm , 1994 .

[20]  D. Freshwater,et al.  Paradigms Lost and Paradigms Regained , 2013 .

[21]  D. Mowery,et al.  Strategic alliances and interfirm knowledge transfer , 1996 .

[22]  Ben L. Kedia,et al.  Cultural Constraints on Transfer of Technology Across Nations: Implications for Research in International and Comparative Management , 1988 .

[23]  R. Veugelers.  Internal R & D expenditures and external technology sourcing , 1997 .

[24]  Hennie Boeije,et al.  The Contribution of Mixed Methods Research to the Field of Childhood Trauma , 2013 .

[25]  J. R. Landis,et al.  The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. , 1977, Biometrics.

[26]  N. Nummela,et al.  Mixed methods in international business research: A value-added perspective , 2006 .

[27]  Leslie E. Palich,et al.  Cultural Diversity and the Performance of Multinational Firms , 1997 .

[28]  Robert D. Tollison,et al.  The Rise and Decline of Nations , 1983 .

[29]  R. Yin.  Case Study Research: Design and Methods , 1984 .

[30]  Giovanni Gavetti,et al.  Capabilities, cognition, and inertia: evidence from digital imaging , 2000 .

[31]  Danny Miller,et al.  The simplicity of competitive repertoires : An empirical analysis , 1996 .

[32]  G. Huber.  Organizational Learning: The Contributing Processes and the Literatures , 1991 .

[33]  Melissa A. Schilling.  Technological Lockout: An Integrative Model of the Economic and Strategic Factors Driving Technology Success and Failure , 1998 .

[34]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  Innovation and Learning: The Two Faces of R&D , 1989 .

[35]  Jane Fielding,et al.  Triangulation and integration: processes, claims and implications , 2006 .

[36]  M. Akoorie,et al.  Broken links: Absorptive Capacity and the internationalisation process of high-tech companies , 2009 .

[37]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .

[38]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  Looking Forward and Looking Backward: Cognitive and Experiential Search , 2000 .

[39]  Morten T. Hansen,et al.  The Search-Transfer Problem: The Role of Weak Ties in Sharing Knowledge across Organization Subunits , 1999 .

[40]  Gabriel Szulanski.  Exploring internal stickiness: Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm , 1996 .

[41]  Randy H. Katz,et al.  Contemporary Logic Design , 2004 .

[42]  Bernard L. Simonin.  Ambiguity and the process of knowledge transfer in strategic alliances , 1999 .

[43]  Xielin Liu,et al.  Comparing innovation systems: a framework and application to China’s transitional context , 2001 .