Damage detection in Timoshenko beam structures by multilayer perceptron and radial basis function networks

This study investigates the efficiency of artificial neural networks (ANNs) in health monitoring of pristine and damaged beam-like structures. Beam modeling is based on Timoshenko theory. Two commonly used network models, multilayer perceptron (MLP) and radial basis neural network (RBNN), are used. Beam material and geometrical properties, beam end conditions and dynamically obtained data are used as input to the neural networks. The combinations of these parameters yield umpteenth input data. Therefore, to examine the effectiveness of ANNs, the frequency of intact beams is first tried to be determined by the network models, given the material and geometrical characteristics of beam elements and support conditions. The methodology to compute the vibrational data utilized in training the networks is provided. Showing the robustness of network models, the second stage of the study is carried out. At this stage, the crack parameters (e.g. the location and severity of crack) are estimated by the ANNs using the beam properties, beam end conditions and vibrational data, which consist of natural frequencies and mode shape rotation values. Despite the multiplexed input data, no data reduction schemes or multistage computations are executed in training and validation of neural network models. As a result of analysis runs, the optimal MLP and RBNN models are determined. Comparison of these models shows that the optimal RBNN algorithm performs better. The effectiveness of optimal ANN models in the presence of noise is also presented. As a conclusion, the trained network can be used as a diagnosis method in structural health monitoring of beam-like structures.

[1]  Simon Haykin,et al.  Neural Networks: A Comprehensive Foundation , 1998 .

[2]  Guido De Roeck,et al.  STRUCTURAL DAMAGE IDENTIFICATION USING MODAL DATA. II: TEST VERIFICATION , 2002 .

[3]  Hong Hao,et al.  Substructuring Technique for Damage Detection Using Statistical Multi-Stage Artificial Neural Network , 2010 .

[4]  Chuanshuang Hu,et al.  A statistical algorithm for comparing mode shapes of vibration testing before and after damage in timbers , 2006, Journal of Wood Science.

[5]  Norris Stubbs,et al.  Damage Localization in Structures Without Baseline Modal Parameters , 1996 .

[6]  Fikret Kocabas,et al.  A neural network approach for prediction of critical submergence of an intake in still water and open channel flow for permeable and impermeable bottom , 2008 .

[7]  James H. Garrett,et al.  Use of neural networks in detection of structural damage , 1992 .

[8]  O. S. Salawu Detection of structural damage through changes in frequency: a review , 1997 .

[9]  Fikret Kocabas,et al.  Compared techniques for the critical submergence of an intake in water flow , 2010, Adv. Eng. Softw..

[10]  E. Peter Carden,et al.  Vibration Based Condition Monitoring: A Review , 2004 .

[11]  Ömer Civalek Flexural and axial vibration analysis of beams with different support conditions using artificial neural networks , 2004 .

[12]  Hikmet Kerem Cigizoglu,et al.  Estimation, forecasting and extrapolation of river flows by artificial neural networks , 2003 .

[13]  D. Marquardt An Algorithm for Least-Squares Estimation of Nonlinear Parameters , 1963 .

[14]  Andrew D. Dimarogonas,et al.  Vibration of cracked structures: A state of the art review , 1996 .

[15]  Mohammad Bagher Menhaj,et al.  Training feedforward networks with the Marquardt algorithm , 1994, IEEE Trans. Neural Networks.

[16]  Guido De Roeck,et al.  STRUCTURAL DAMAGE IDENTIFICATION USING MODAL DATA. I: SIMULATION VERIFICATION , 2002 .

[17]  Dayal R. Parhi,et al.  Application of Neural Network for fault diagnosis of cracked cantilever beam , 2009, 2009 World Congress on Nature & Biologically Inspired Computing (NaBIC).

[18]  Simon Haykin,et al.  Neural Networks and Learning Machines , 2010 .

[19]  Özgür Kişi,et al.  Multi-layer perceptrons with Levenberg-Marquardt training algorithm for suspended sediment concentration prediction and estimation / Prévision et estimation de la concentration en matières en suspension avec des perceptrons multi-couches et l’algorithme d’apprentissage de Levenberg-Marquardt , 2004 .

[20]  T Poggio,et al.  Regularization Algorithms for Learning That Are Equivalent to Multilayer Networks , 1990, Science.

[21]  Murat Kisa,et al.  Buckling load estimation of cracked columns using artificial neural network modeling technique , 2012 .

[22]  Qiusheng Li,et al.  Vibratory Characteristics of Timoshenko Beams with Arbitrary Number of Cracks , 2003 .

[23]  S. S. Law,et al.  DAMAGE LOCALIZATION BY DIRECTLY USING INCOMPLETE MODE SHAPES. TECHNICAL NOTE , 2000 .

[24]  O. Ks Multi-layer perceptrons with Levenberg-Marquardt training algorithm for suspended sediment concentration prediction and estimation , 2004 .

[25]  D. Swanson,et al.  Higher-frequency wavenumber shift and frequency shift in a cracked, vibrating beam , 2008 .

[26]  Hoon Sohn,et al.  A review of structural health monitoring literature 1996-2001 , 2002 .

[27]  Pizhong Qiao,et al.  Vibration-based Damage Identification Methods: A Review and Comparative Study , 2011 .

[28]  D. Broomhead,et al.  Radial Basis Functions, Multi-Variable Functional Interpolation and Adaptive Networks , 1988 .

[29]  Mahmut Bilgehan,et al.  Comparison of ANFIS and NN models - With a study in critical buckling load estimation , 2011, Appl. Soft Comput..

[30]  David S. Broomhead,et al.  Multivariable Functional Interpolation and Adaptive Networks , 1988, Complex Syst..

[31]  Arun Kumar Pandey,et al.  Damage detection from changes in curvature mode shapes , 1991 .

[32]  Marc Hoit Computer Assisted Structural Analysis and Modeling , 1994 .

[33]  R. A. Shenoi,et al.  Quantification and localisation of damage in beam-like structures by using artificial neural networks with experimental validation , 2003 .

[34]  Charles R. Farrar,et al.  Damage identification and health monitoring of structural and mechanical systems from changes in their vibration characteristics: A literature review , 1996 .

[35]  Nachimuthu Karunanithi,et al.  Neural Networks for River Flow Prediction , 1994 .

[36]  B. P. Nandwana,et al.  DETECTION OF THE LOCATION AND SIZE OF A CRACK IN STEPPED CANTILEVER BEAMS BASED ON MEASUREMENTS OF NATURAL FREQUENCIES , 1997 .

[37]  C. Antony Jeyasehar,et al.  ANew Procedure for Damage Assessment of Prestressed Concrete Beams Using Artificial Neural Network , 2014 .

[38]  S. Law,et al.  Structural Damage Detection from Incomplete and Noisy Modal Test Data , 1998 .

[39]  Soon Heung Chang,et al.  Radial basis function networks applied to DNBR calculation in digital core protection systems , 2003 .

[40]  G. De Roeck,et al.  Damage detection in bridges using modal curvatures: application to a real damage scenario , 1999 .

[41]  S. S. Law,et al.  Damage localization in plate structures from uniform load surface curvature , 2004 .

[42]  S. Chinchalkar DETERMINATION OF CRACK LOCATION IN BEAMS USING NATURAL FREQUENCIES , 2001 .

[43]  Norhisham Bakhary Structural condition monitoring and damage identification with artificial neural network , 2009 .

[44]  A. K. Pandey,et al.  Damage Detection in Structures Using Changes in Flexibility , 1994 .

[45]  Sundaram Suresh,et al.  Identification of crack location and depth in a cantilever beam using a modular neural network approach , 2004 .

[46]  C. Farrar,et al.  SYSTEM IDENTIFICATION FROM AMBIENT VIBRATION MEASUREMENTS ON A BRIDGE , 1997 .