A socio-mathematical approach to exploring conflicts between energy retrofit and perceived heritage character

Abstract Improving the energy efficiency of buildings is a key climate change mitigation strategy. The application of which will require substantial improvements in the pre-existing stock; a subset of which are buildings of historic importance. Retrofitting such buildings is controversial, as historic elements might be altered or covered up, thereby changing the character of the building. In this work, we introduce a novel socio-mathematical method to aid the resolution of this controversy. Firstly, we garner in a new way the views of 116 members of the public about the acceptability of 15 common retrofit measures. Secondly, the public's ranking of the acceptability of the measures with respect to heritage impact is compared to a ranking of the energy saving given by the measures when analysed using a dynamic thermal simulation of the building. No simple correlation is found; hence it is concluded that measures that present greater energy savings are not de facto more intrusive, and that there is the potential for a constructive dialogue between those inspired by a conservation agenda and those targeting carbon savings. Finally, by using a Pareto front approach, a new theory is developed of how to identify measures that are sensible in the eyes of both parties. This new three-stage process will be of use to those in Government attempting to resolve such conflicts or set national guidance.

[1]  Ambrose Dodoo,et al.  Life cycle primary energy implication of retrofitting a wood-framed apartment building to passive house standard , 2010 .

[2]  V. Pracchi Historic Buildings and Energy Efficiency , 2014 .

[3]  Ray Galvin,et al.  Irrational homeowners? How aesthetics and heritage values influence thermal retrofit decisions in the United Kingdom , 2016 .

[4]  Burra Charter,et al.  The Burra Charter ( The Australia ICOMOS Charter for Places of Cultural Significance ) , 2000 .

[5]  Ulrich Filippi Oberegger,et al.  Energy retrofit and conservation of a historic building using multi-objective optimization and an analytic hierarchy process , 2017 .

[6]  W Wim Zeiler,et al.  Occupancy measurement in commercial office buildings for demand-driven control applications : a survey and detection system evaluation , 2015 .

[7]  Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas,et al.  Multiple criteria assessment of alternatives for built and human environment renovation , 2010 .

[8]  Amanda L. Webb,et al.  Energy retrofits in historic and traditional buildings: A review of problems and methods , 2017 .

[9]  Debbie James The refurbishment of Herschel House , 2000 .

[10]  John Hooper Harvey,et al.  Conservation of buildings , 1972 .

[11]  Dagnija Blumberga,et al.  Thermal insulation alternatives of historic brick buildings in Baltic Sea Region , 2014 .

[12]  Giuseppe Peter Vanoli,et al.  Energy retrofit of an educational building in the ancient center of Benevento. Feasibility study of energy savings and respect of the historical value , 2015 .

[13]  May Cassar,et al.  Energy Efficiency in Heritage Buildings — Future Challenges and Research Needs , 2014 .

[14]  P. J. Godwin,et al.  Building Conservation and Sustainability in the United Kingdom , 2011 .

[15]  John Pendlebury,et al.  Conservation and Regeneration: Complementary or Conflicting Processes? The Case of Grainger Town, Newcastle upon Tyne , 2002 .

[16]  Tor Broström,et al.  A transdisciplinary approach on the energy efficient retrofitting of a historic building in the Aegean Region of Turkey , 2015 .

[17]  Paul Cooper,et al.  Existing building retrofits: Methodology and state-of-the-art , 2012 .

[18]  Francesco Frontini,et al.  Energy efficiency and renewable solar energy integration in heritage historic buildings , 2014 .

[19]  I. J. Opstelten,et al.  Dutch Research into User Behaviour in Relation to Energy Use of Residences , 2008 .

[20]  Alexander V. Lotov,et al.  Interactive Decision Maps: Approximation and Visualization of Pareto Frontier , 2004 .

[21]  Tor Broström,et al.  A Method to Assess the Potential for and Consequences of Energy Retrofits in Swedish Historic Buildings , 2014 .

[22]  Douglas John Harris,et al.  A Guide to Energy Management in Buildings , 2011 .

[23]  Fabrizio Ascione,et al.  Historical buildings: Multidisciplinary approach to structural/energy diagnosis and performance assessment☆ , 2017 .

[24]  Henrietta Park,et al.  Bath , 1911, The Hospital.

[25]  Brit Anak Kayan,et al.  Green maintenance for historic masonry buildings: an emerging concept , 2011 .

[26]  John Earl,et al.  Building Conservation Philosophy , 1996 .

[27]  Paul Drury,et al.  Conservation principles: policies and guidance for the sustainable management of the historic environment , 2008 .

[28]  G. G. Stokes "J." , 1890, The New Yale Book of Quotations.

[29]  J. F. Coeterier,et al.  Lay people’s evaluation of historic sites , 2002 .