A robust penalty coupling of non-matching isogeometric Kirchhoff–Love shell patches in large deformations

Abstract Isogeometric Kirchhoff–Love elements have been receiving increasing attention in geometrically nonlinear analysis of thin shells because they make it possible to meet the C 1 requirement in the interior of surface patches and to avoid the use of finite rotations. However, engineering structures of appreciable complexity are typically modeled using multiple patches and, often, neither rotational continuity nor conforming discretization can be practically obtained at patch interfaces. Simple penalty approaches for coupling adjacent patches, applicable to either smooth or non-smooth interfaces and either matching or non-matching discretizations, have been proposed. Although the problem dependence of the penalty coefficient can be reduced by scaling factors which take into account geometrical and material parameters, only high values of the penalty coefficient can guarantee a negligible coupling error in all possible cases. However, this can lead to an ill conditioned problem and to an increasing iterative effort for solving the nonlinear discrete equations. In this work, we show how to avoid this drawback by rewriting the penalty terms in an Hellinger–Reissner form, introducing independent fields work-conjugated to the coupling equations. This technique avoids convergence problems, making the analysis robust also for very high values of the penalty coefficient, which can be then employed to avert coupling errors. Moreover, a proper choice of the basis functions for the new fields provides an accurate coupling also for general non-matching cases, preventing overconstrained solutions. The additional variables are condensed out and then not involved in the global system of equations to be solved. A highly efficient approach based on a mixed integration point strategy and an interface-wise reduced integration rule makes the condensation inexpensive preserving the sparsity of the condensed stiffness matrix and the coupling accuracy.

[1]  Habibou Maitournam,et al.  Selective and reduced numerical integrations for NURBS-based isogeometric analysis , 2015 .

[2]  W. Desmet,et al.  Isogeometric analysis for nonlinear planar pantographic lattice: discrete and continuum models , 2019 .

[3]  Francesco Liguori,et al.  An isogeometric formulation of the Koiter’s theory for buckling and initial post-buckling analysis of composite shells , 2018, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering.

[4]  Paul M. Weaver,et al.  Design, Manufacture and Test of an In-Situ Consolidated Thermoplastic Variable-Stiffness Wingbox , 2019, AIAA Journal.

[5]  Barbara Wohlmuth,et al.  Isogeometric dual mortar methods for computational contact mechanics , 2016 .

[6]  Francesco Liguori,et al.  Post-buckling optimisation strategy of imperfection sensitive composite shells using Koiter method and Monte Carlo simulation , 2018 .

[7]  Domenico Magisano,et al.  How to improve efficiency and robustness of the Newton method in geometrically non-linear structural problem discretized via displacement-based finite elements , 2017 .

[8]  Alessandro Reali,et al.  A simplified Kirchhoff–Love large deformation model for elastic shells and its effective isogeometric formulation , 2019, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering.

[9]  Martin Ruess,et al.  An efficient mixed variational reduced‐order model formulation for nonlinear analyses of elastic shells , 2018 .

[10]  Wim Desmet,et al.  A flexible approach for coupling NURBS patches in rotationless isogeometric analysis of Kirchhoff-Love shells , 2017 .

[11]  Ellen Kuhl,et al.  Isogeometric Kirchhoff-Love shell formulations for biological membranes. , 2015, Computer methods in applied mechanics and engineering.

[12]  M. Abdalla,et al.  Co-rotational finite element formulation used in the Koiter–Newton method for nonlinear buckling analyses , 2016 .

[13]  Z. Gürdal,et al.  In-plane response of laminates with spatially varying fiber orientations - Variable stiffness concept , 1993 .

[14]  Mario Kapl,et al.  An isogeometric C1 subspace on unstructured multi-patch planar domains , 2019, Comput. Aided Geom. Des..

[15]  Francesco Liguori,et al.  Accurate and efficient a posteriori account of geometrical imperfections in Koiter finite element analysis , 2017 .

[16]  Les A. Piegl,et al.  The NURBS Book , 1995, Monographs in Visual Communication.

[17]  Thomas J. R. Hughes,et al.  Isogeometric Analysis: Toward Integration of CAD and FEA , 2009 .

[18]  Domenico Magisano,et al.  Advantages of the mixed format in geometrically nonlinear analysis of beams and shells using solid finite elements , 2017 .

[19]  E. Riks An incremental approach to the solution of snapping and buckling problems , 1979 .

[20]  Sven Klinkel,et al.  The weak substitution method – an application of the mortar method for patch coupling in NURBS‐based isogeometric analysis , 2015 .

[21]  Barbara Wohlmuth,et al.  Biorthogonal splines for optimal weak patch-coupling in isogeometric analysis with applications to finite deformation elasticity , 2018, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering.

[22]  Raffaele Casciaro,et al.  Asymptotic post-buckling analysis of rectangular plates by HC finite elements , 1995 .

[23]  Alessandro Reali,et al.  Assumed Natural Strain NURBS-based solid-shell element for the analysis of large deformation elasto-plastic thin-shell structures , 2015 .

[24]  Onur Atak,et al.  A robust patch coupling method for NURBS-based isogeometric analysis of non-conforming multipatch surfaces , 2017 .

[25]  Roland Wüchner,et al.  Domain Decomposition Methods and Kirchhoff-Love Shell Multipatch Coupling in Isogeometric Analysis , 2015 .

[26]  Bernd Simeon,et al.  On penalty-free formulations for multipatch isogeometric Kirchhoff-Love shells , 2017, Math. Comput. Simul..

[27]  Giancarlo Sangalli,et al.  Matrix-free weighted quadrature for a computationally efficient isogeometric k-method , 2017, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering.

[28]  Louis Jezequel,et al.  A C0/G1 multiple patches connection method in isogeometric analysis , 2015 .

[29]  G. Garcea,et al.  An efficient isogeometric solid-shell formulation for geometrically nonlinear analysis of elastic shells , 2018 .

[30]  Roger A. Sauer,et al.  A new rotation-free isogeometric thin shell formulation and a corresponding continuity constraint for patch boundaries , 2017 .

[31]  J. C. Simo,et al.  A perturbed Lagrangian formulation for the finite element solution of contact problems , 1985 .

[32]  Ralf Müller,et al.  Dual and approximate dual basis functions for B-splines and NURBS – Comparison and application for an efficient coupling of patches with the isogeometric mortar method , 2017 .

[33]  Thomas J. R. Hughes,et al.  Variationally consistent isogeometric analysis of trimmed thin shells at finite deformations, based on the STEP exchange format , 2018, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering.

[34]  Roland Wüchner,et al.  A Nitsche‐type formulation and comparison of the most common domain decomposition methods in isogeometric analysis , 2014 .

[35]  Dinar Camotim,et al.  Deformation modes for the post-critical analysis of thin-walled compressed members by a Koiter semi-analytic approach , 2017 .

[36]  Yuri Bazilevs,et al.  The bending strip method for isogeometric analysis of Kirchhoff–Love shell structures comprised of multiple patches , 2010 .

[37]  Roland Wüchner,et al.  Analysis in computer aided design: Nonlinear isogeometric B-Rep analysis of shell structures , 2015 .

[38]  Roland Wüchner,et al.  Isogeometric shell analysis with Kirchhoff–Love elements , 2009 .

[39]  Francesco Ubertini,et al.  Koiter analysis of folded structures using a corotational approach , 2013 .

[40]  Sven Klinkel,et al.  Multi-patch isogeometric analysis for Kirchhoff–Love shell elements , 2019, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering.

[41]  Erik Lund,et al.  Nonlinear Buckling Optimization of Composite Structures , 2010 .

[42]  Giuseppe A. Trunfio,et al.  Mixed formulation and locking in path-following nonlinear analysis , 1998 .

[43]  Alessandro Reali,et al.  A hybrid isogeometric approach on multi-patches with applications to Kirchhoff plates and eigenvalue problems , 2017, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering.

[44]  Paul M. Weaver,et al.  Postbuckling optimisation of a variable angle tow composite wingbox using a multi-modal Koiter approach , 2019, Thin-Walled Structures.

[45]  Mario Kapl,et al.  Construction of analysis-suitable G1 planar multi-patch parameterizations , 2017, Comput. Aided Des..

[46]  Ming-Chen Hsu,et al.  Penalty coupling of non-matching isogeometric Kirchhoff–Love shell patches with application to composite wind turbine blades , 2019, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering.

[47]  Michael C. H. Wu,et al.  Isogeometric Kirchhoff–Love shell formulations for general hyperelastic materials , 2015 .

[48]  A. Combescure,et al.  Efficient isogeometric NURBS-based solid-shell elements: Mixed formulation and B-method , 2013 .

[49]  R. Echter,et al.  A hierarchic family of isogeometric shell finite elements , 2013 .

[50]  Laura De Lorenzis,et al.  Reduced integration at superconvergent points in isogeometric analysis , 2018 .

[51]  Josef Kiendl,et al.  Isogeometric Kirchhoff–Love shell formulation for elasto-plasticity , 2018, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering.

[52]  Barbara Wohlmuth,et al.  Isogeometric mortar methods , 2014, 1407.8313.

[53]  K. Y. Sze,et al.  An eight‐node hybrid‐stress solid‐shell element for geometric non‐linear analysis of elastic shells , 2002 .

[54]  Kjetil André Johannessen,et al.  Optimal quadrature for univariate and tensor product splines , 2017 .

[55]  Wim Desmet,et al.  Isogeometric analysis for nonlinear planar Kirchhoff rods: Weighted residual formulation and collocation of the strong form , 2018, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering.

[56]  Wing Kam Liu,et al.  Stress projection for membrane and shear locking in shell finite elements , 1985 .

[57]  Alain Combescure,et al.  An isogeometric locking‐free NURBS‐based solid‐shell element for geometrically nonlinear analysis , 2015 .

[58]  Martin Ruess,et al.  Nitsche’s method for a coupling of isogeometric thin shells and blended shell structures , 2015 .