Ausubel’s principle of prior knowledge in first year mechanics

The Force Concept Inventory, a 30-question multiple choice test, has been used to test the baseline knowledge in mechanics prior to a course of instruction at Hull over the three years corresponding to entry in 2008, 2009 and 2010. Students whose pre-university education occurred outside the UK or who were repeating the year have been excluded from the analysis in order to focus attention on first-time UK students. These constitute the great majority of the entrants and the results essentially characterise the entry-level knowledge of a typical cohort. Two interesting findings have emerged. First, there is a wide range of abilities within each cohort, as judged by the test scores, and secondly, analysis of the scores question by question reveals a remarkable consistency between the different cohorts. This consistency extends even to the distribution of choices within individual questions. Five such questions are analysed in detailed to reveal which aspects of mechanics a typical class finds difficult. Ausubel‟s principle of first finding out what students know in order to teach accordingly can therefore be applied not to the individual students but to the class as a whole and suggestions as to how instruction might be tailored to address the weaknesses revealed by the Force Concept Inventory are discussed.

[1]  Lei Bao,et al.  Model Analysis: Representing and Assessing the Dynamics of Student Learning. , 2006 .

[2]  David Hestenes,et al.  Interpreting the force concept inventory: A response to March 1995 critique by Huffman and Heller , 1995 .

[3]  Colin S. Wallace,et al.  Do Concept Inventories Actually Measure Anything , 2010 .

[4]  D. Hestenes Toward a modeling theory of physics instruction , 1987 .

[5]  Nancy J. Nersessian,et al.  Creating Scientific Concepts , 2008 .

[6]  David Hestenes,et al.  Interpreting the Force Concept Inventory A response to Huffman and Heller , 1995 .

[7]  Tina Overton,et al.  Cognitive psychology and problem solving in the physical sciences , 2010 .

[8]  Kimberly Tanner,et al.  The Problem of Revealing How Students Think: Concept Inventories and Beyond , 2010, CBE life sciences education.

[9]  Douglas Huffman,et al.  Interpreting the force concept inventory: A reply to Hestenes and Halloun , 1995 .

[10]  Jo Stewart,et al.  Context sensitivity in the force concept inventory , 2007 .

[11]  Juan R. Burciaga,et al.  Teaching Physics with the Physics Suite , 2004 .

[12]  J. Novak,et al.  Educational Psychology: A Cognitive View , 1969 .

[13]  Ana Susac,et al.  Rasch Model Based Analysis of the Force Concept Inventory. , 2010 .

[14]  Lillian C. McDermott,et al.  Oersted Medal Lecture 2001: “Physics Education Research—The Key to Student Learning” , 2001 .

[15]  Andrea A. diSessa,et al.  The third revolution in computers and education , 1987 .

[16]  Douglas Huffman,et al.  What does the force concept inventory actually measure , 1995 .

[17]  David Sands First year mechanics taught through modelling in VPython , 2010 .

[18]  E. Yalow Educational psychology: A cognitive view. 2nd ed. , 1978 .