Digitizing dissertations for an institutional repository: a process and cost analysis.

OBJECTIVE This paper describes the Lamar Soutter Library's process and costs associated with digitizing 300 doctoral dissertations for a newly implemented institutional repository at the University of Massachusetts Medical School. METHODOLOGY Project tasks included identifying metadata elements, obtaining and tracking permissions, converting the dissertations to an electronic format, and coordinating workflow between library departments. Each dissertation was scanned, reviewed for quality control, enhanced with a table of contents, processed through an optical character recognition function, and added to the institutional repository. RESULTS Three hundred and twenty dissertations were digitized and added to the repository for a cost of $23,562, or $0.28 per page. Seventy-four percent of the authors who were contacted (n = 282) granted permission to digitize their dissertations. Processing time per title was 170 minutes, for a total processing time of 906 hours. In the first 17 months, full-text dissertations in the collection were downloaded 17,555 times. CONCLUSION Locally digitizing dissertations or other scholarly works for inclusion in institutional repositories can be cost effective, especially if small, defined projects are chosen. A successful project serves as an excellent recruitment strategy for the institutional repository and helps libraries build new relationships. Challenges include workflow, cost, policy development, and copyright permissions.

[1]  Mark Jordan,et al.  INSTITUTIONAL REPOSITORIES IN , 2006 .

[2]  Susan Gibbons,et al.  Understanding Faculty to Improve Content Recruitment for Institutional Repositories , 2005, D Lib Mag..

[3]  Heather A. Piwowar,et al.  Sharing Detailed Research Data Is Associated with Increased Citation Rate , 2007, PloS one.

[4]  Christopher W. Nolan,et al.  Promoting and Archiving Student Work through an Institutional Repository: Trinity University, LASR, and the Digital Commons , 2006 .

[5]  Cat S. McDowell Evaluating Institutional Repository Deployment in American Academe Since Early 2005: Repositories by the Numbers, Part 2 , 2007, D Lib Mag..

[6]  Adrienne Muir Preservation, access and intellectual property rights challenges for libraries in the digital environment , 2006 .

[7]  Oya Y. Rieger,et al.  Moving Theory into Practice: Digital Imaging for Libraries and Archives , 2000 .

[8]  K. Antelman Do Open-Access Articles Have a Greater Research Impact? , 2004 .

[9]  D. Callahan,et al.  At the Institute , 1975, Hastings Center Report.

[10]  Trudy Levy Moving Theory into Practice: Digital Imaging for Libraries and Archives , 2003, J. Documentation.

[11]  A. Hatfield,et al.  Case study: lessons learned through digitizing the National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research Collection. , 2007, Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA.

[12]  S. Lawrence Free online availability substantially increases a paper's impact , 2001, Nature.

[13]  Karen Coyle,et al.  Mass Digitization of Books. , 2006 .

[14]  Charles Oppenheim,et al.  The citation advantage of open-access articles , 2008, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[15]  Bill Hubbard OpenDOAR : the Directory of Open Access Repositories , 2005 .

[16]  James L. Mullins,et al.  Top ten assumptions for the future of academic libraries and librarians A report from the ACRL research committee , 2007 .

[17]  Anthony Troncale Moving Theory into Practice: Digital Imaging for Libraries and Archives , 2000 .

[18]  Raym Crow,et al.  The case for institutional repositories : a SPARC position paper , 2002 .

[19]  Leah Krevit,et al.  Herding cats: Designing DigitalCommons @ The Texas Medical Center, a multi-institutional repository , 2007, OCLC Syst. Serv..

[20]  Mary E. Piorun,et al.  Challenges and lessons learned: moving from image database to institutional repository , 2007, OCLC Syst. Serv..

[21]  Holly E Phillips,et al.  Leading roles for reference librarians in institutional repositories: One library's experience , 2005 .