Styles of learning and approaches to studying in higher education

Gordon Pask contributed greatly to ways of conceptualising student learning in higher education. In particular, the three learning or conceptual styles – holist, serialist and versatile – together with the associated pathologies of globetrotting and improvidence, have helped to describe important differences in the ways students tackle academic tasks and in their preferences for differing styles of teaching. These concepts are related to other distinctions used to describe student learning – deep, surface, and strategic approaches to learning – and this article summarises research by the author and his colleagues into the patterns of relationship which have been identified. These studies have used large‐scale inventory surveys, but also intensive interviews with students which have explored how students seek to develop conceptual understanding, another important area explored by Pask. Increasingly, this research is indicating ways of improving teaching in higher education in ways which directly affect the quality of student learning.

[1]  Noel Entwistle,et al.  Degrees of excellence: The academic achievement game , 1977 .

[2]  Roy Heath.  The Reasonable Adventurer , 1964 .

[3]  F. Marton,et al.  Learning and Awareness , 1997 .

[4]  Noel Entwistle,et al.  Identifying students at risk through ineffective study strategies , 1996 .

[5]  Noel Entwistle,et al.  Styles of learning and teaching , 1981 .

[6]  N. Entwistle,et al.  Identifying distinctive approaches to studying , 1979 .

[7]  Noel Entwistle,et al.  Frameworks for understanding as experienced in essay writing and in preparing for examination , 1995 .

[8]  J. Biggs.  Individual differences in study processes and the Quality of Learning Outcomes , 1979 .

[9]  Gordon Pask,et al.  Caste: A system for exhibiting learning strategies and regulating uncertainties , 1973 .

[10]  J. Biggs.  Student Approaches to Learning and Studying , 1987 .

[11]  G. Pask.  Learning Strategies, Teaching Strategies, and Conceptual or Learning Style , 1988 .

[12]  Noel Entwistle,et al.  Stages, Levels, Styles or Strategies: dilemmas in the description of thinking , 1979 .

[13]  N. Entwistle,et al.  Understanding Student Learning , 1983 .

[14]  Noel Entwistle,et al.  Motivational Factors in Students' Approaches to Learning , 1988 .

[15]  A Fransson,et al.  On qualitative differences in learning: IV -- effects of intrinsic motivation and extrinsic test anxiety on process and outcome. , 1977, The British journal of educational psychology.

[16]  F. Marton,et al.  The Experience of Learning , 1984 .

[17]  Noel Entwistle,et al.  Approaches to Learning and Levels of Understanding , 1979 .

[18]  Paul Ramsden,et al.  Student learning and perceptions of the academic environment , 1979 .

[19]  A. M. Andrew.  Cybernetics, Art and Ideas, Jasia Reichardt (Ed.). Studio Vista, London (1971), 207 pp. £4.20. , 1972 .

[20]  Gordon Pask,et al.  CONVERSATIONAL TECHNIQUES IN THE STUDY AND PRACTICE OF EDUCATION , 1976 .

[21]  Gordon Pask,et al.  Learning Strategies and Individual Competence. , 1972 .

[22]  G. Pask.  STYLES AND STRATEGIES OF LEARNING , 1976 .

[23]  Velda McCune,et al.  Conceptions, styles, and approaches within higher education: Analytical abstractions and everyday experience. , 2001 .

[24]  J. Rushton.  Book Review: Degrees of Excellence: the academic achievement game , 1978 .

[25]  F. Marton,et al.  ON QUALITATIVE DIFFERENCES IN LEARNING: I—OUTCOME AND PROCESS* , 1976 .

[26]  J. Biggs.  What do inventories of students' learning processes really measure? A theoretical review and clarification. , 1993, The British journal of educational psychology.