Nitrogen transformations under different conditions in open ponds by means of microalgae-bacteria consortium treating pig slurry.

Four open ponds inoculated with microalgae-bacteria consortium treating different swine slurries (fresh and anaerobically digested) were evaluated in terms of nitrogen transformation under optimal and real conditions of temperature and illumination. Ammonium complete depletion was not achieved. Ponds operated under real conditions presented lower ammonium removal. Elimination capacities were around 26 mg N/Ld and were subsequently increased with increasing inlet ammonium loading rate. Different nitrogen transformation was observed depending on substrate source. When anaerobically digested slurry was fed to the ponds, nitrification followed by biomass uptake and denitrification were the main nitrogen transformation taking place depending on inlet ammonium loading rate and operational conditions. Ponds fed with fresh slurry exhibited denitrification as the main nitrogen removal mechanism for the pond operated under real conditions while under optimal conditions stripping, denitrification and biomass uptake contributed similarly. Therefore, this study confirmed that the so-claimed nitrogen recovery by microalgae biomass is frequently overestimated.

[1]  Francisco Gabriel Acién Fernández,et al.  Microalgae, Mass Culture Methods , 2010 .

[2]  O. Pulz,et al.  Photobioreactors: production systems for phototrophic microorganisms , 2001, Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology.

[3]  Elizabeth Kebede-Westhead,et al.  Treatment of swine manure effluent using freshwater algae: Production, nutrient recovery, and elemental composition of algal biomass at four effluent loading rates , 2006, Journal of Applied Phycology.

[4]  N. Revsbech,et al.  Competition between Ammonia-Oxidizing Bacteria and Benthic Microalgae , 2004, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[5]  A. Vonshak.  Outdoor Mass Production of Spirulina: The Basic Concept , 1997 .

[6]  E. Arnold,et al.  Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. 16th ed. , 1985 .

[7]  J. Verhoeven,et al.  Denitrification in the periphyton associated with plant shoots and in the sediment of a wetland system supplied with sewage treatment plant effluent , 2003, Hydrobiologia.

[8]  C. González‐Fernández,et al.  Performance comparison of two photobioreactors configurations (open and closed to the atmosphere) treating anaerobically degraded swine slurry. , 2010, Bioresource technology.

[9]  Mogens Henze,et al.  Activated sludge models ASM1, ASM2, ASM2d and ASM3 , 2015 .

[10]  A. Abeliovich,et al.  Role of heterotrophic nutrition in growth of the alga Scenedesmus obliquus in high-rate oxidation ponds , 1978, Applied and environmental microbiology.

[11]  H. Gijzen,et al.  Comparison of ammonia volatilisation rates in algae and duckweed-based waste stabilisation ponds treating domestic wastewater. , 2003, Water research.

[12]  P. García-Encina,et al.  Microalgae-based processes for the biodegradation of pretreated piggery wastewaters , 2008, Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology.

[13]  J. Noüe,et al.  Biotreatment of anaerobically digested swine manure with microalgae , 1989 .

[14]  Michael C. Flickinger,et al.  Encyclopedia of bioprocess technology : fermentation, biocatalysis, and bioseparation , 1999 .

[15]  H. D. Stensel,et al.  Wastewater Engineering: Treatment and Reuse , 2002 .

[16]  Ann C Wilkie,et al.  Recovery of dairy manure nutrients by benthic freshwater algae. , 2002, Bioresource technology.

[17]  I. Kapdan,et al.  Batch kinetics of nitrogen and phosphorus removal from synthetic wastewater by algae , 2006 .

[18]  Yanna Liang,et al.  Biomass and lipid productivities of Chlorella vulgaris under autotrophic, heterotrophic and mixotrophic growth conditions , 2009, Biotechnology Letters.

[19]  R. Muñoz,et al.  Efficient nutrient removal from swine manure in a tubular biofilm photo-bioreactor using algae-bacteria consortia. , 2008, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[20]  J. R. Miner,et al.  Algal growth in diluted pig waste , 1975 .

[21]  B. Ahring,et al.  Anaerobic digestion of swine manure: Inhibition by ammonia , 1998 .

[22]  M. F. Colmenarejo,et al.  Production of Biomass (Algae-Bacteria) by Using a Mixture of Settled Swine and Sewage as Substrate , 2006, Journal of environmental science and health. Part A, Toxic/hazardous substances & environmental engineering.

[23]  A. E. Greenberg,et al.  Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater seventh edition , 2013 .

[24]  C. Pizarro,et al.  Nitrogen and phosphorus removal rates using small algal turfs grown with dairy manure , 2002, Journal of Applied Phycology.

[25]  J. Grobbelaar,et al.  The influence of nitrogen and phosphorus on algal growth and quality in outdoor mass algal cultures , 1987 .

[26]  Raúl Muñoz,et al.  Long-term operation of high rate algal ponds for the bioremediation of piggery wastewaters at high loading rates. , 2009, Bioresource technology.