Organizational and Relational Resources in IOS Diffusion: A Cross Country Study between Korean and Chinese Supply Chains

This research addresses the theoretically neglected question of how the internal diffusion of inter-organizational systems (IOS) into a firm's activities and its external diffusion into the supply chain partners influence performance improvement. Drawing on the resource-based view, our research model posits that organizational and relational resources affect both internal and external diffusion, which in turn, influence performance improvement. Survey results from 187 managers in Korean and Chinese firms showed that while the impact of organizational resources on a firm's performance improvement was fully mediated by IOS diffusion, the diffusion partially mediates the impact of relational resources on performance improvement. This study also revealed a significantly different pattern of diffusion between Korean and Chinese firms, i.e. showing the impact of organizational and relational resources on a firm's performance through external diffusion of IOS are significantly greater in Korean firms, while the impact of internal diffusion was significantly greater in Chinese firms. In other words, Korean firms tend to externally diffuse IOS toward their business partners, while Chinese firms tend to internally diffuse IOS by deploying IOS from their partners. The implications of these findings for both research and practice are discussed.

[1]  Kenneth L. Kraemer,et al.  The Process of Innovation Assimilation by Firms in Different Countries: A Technology Diffusion Perspective on E-Business , 2006, Manag. Sci..

[2]  Toby E. Stuart.  Interorganizational alliances and the performance of firms: A study of growth and innovation rates i , 2000 .

[3]  Jonathan P. Doh,et al.  Entrepreneurial Privatization Strategies: Order of Entry and Local Partner Collaboration as Sources of Competitive Advantage , 2000 .

[4]  Viswanath Venkatesh,et al.  Assimilation of Interorganizational Business Process Standards , 2007, Inf. Syst. Res..

[5]  Barbara B. Flynn,et al.  The impact of power and relationship commitment on the integration between manufacturers and customers in a supply chain , 2008 .

[6]  Scott B. MacKenzie,et al.  Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[7]  M. Bensaou,et al.  Buyer-Supplier Relations in Industrial Markets: When Do Buyers Risk Making Idiosyncratic Investments? , 1999 .

[8]  Robert N. Stern,et al.  The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective. , 1979 .

[9]  M. Wade,et al.  Review: the resource-based view and information systems research: review, extension, and suggestions for future research , 2004 .

[10]  Qing Hu,et al.  Assimilation of Enterprise Systems: The Effect of Institutional Pressures and the Mediating Role of Top Management , 2007, MIS Q..

[11]  Paul Brown,et al.  Organizational Assimilation of Electronic Procurement Innovations , 2009, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[12]  Omar El Sawy,et al.  Coordinating for Flexibility in e-Business Supply Chains , 2004, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[13]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  Research Report: Empirical Test of an EDI Adoption Model , 2001, Inf. Syst. Res..

[14]  K. Ramamurthy,et al.  Determinants and outcomes of electronic data interchange diffusion , 1995 .

[15]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  Electronic Data Interchange and Small Organizations: Adoption and Impact of Technology , 1995, MIS Q..

[16]  Varun Grover,et al.  Shaping Agility through Digital Options: Reconceptualizing the Role of Information Technology in Contemporary Firms , 2003, MIS Q..

[17]  R. Grant.  The Resource-Based Theory of Competitive Advantage: Implications for Strategy Formulation , 1991 .

[18]  Richard G. Netemeyer,et al.  Handbook of Marketing Scales: Multi-Item Measures for Marketing and Consumer Behavior Research , 1993 .

[19]  Bernard C. Y. Tan,et al.  A Cross-Cultural Study on Escalation of Commitment Behavior in Software Projects , 2000, MIS Q..

[20]  Paul J. Hart,et al.  Power and Trust: Critical Factors in the Adoption and Use of Electronic Data Interchange , 1997 .

[21]  Jeffrey H. Dyer,et al.  The Relational View: Cooperative Strategy and Sources of Interorganizational Competitive Advantage , 1998 .

[22]  Ismail Sila,et al.  Do organisational and environmental factors moderate the effects of Internet-based interorganisational systems on firm performance? , 2010, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[23]  Robert E. Hoskisson,et al.  Resource complementarity in business combinations: Extending the logic to organizational alliances , 2001 .

[24]  G. John.  An Empirical Investigation of Some Antecedents of Opportunism in a Marketing Channel , 1984 .

[25]  G. Day.  The Capabilities of Market-Driven Organizations , 1994 .

[26]  Cheryl Burke Jarvis,et al.  A Critical Review of Construct Indicators and Measurement Model Misspecification in Marketing and Consumer Research , 2003 .

[27]  Anandhi S. Bharadwaj,et al.  A Resource-Based Perspective on Information Technology Capability and Firm Performance: An Empirical Investigation , 2000, MIS Q..

[28]  Varun Grover,et al.  The Initiation, Adoption, and Implementation of Telecommunications Technologies in U.S. Organizations , 1993, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[29]  Thompson S. H. Teo,et al.  Assimilation and Diffusion of Web Technologies in Supply-Chain Management: An Examination of Key Drivers and Performance Impacts , 2004, Int. J. Electron. Commer..

[30]  Kevin Zhu,et al.  Research Note - Information Technology in Supply Chains: The Value of IT-Enabled Resources Under Competition , 2009, Inf. Syst. Res..

[31]  Ashley A. Bush,et al.  Complementarities Between Product Design Modularity and IT Infrastructure Flexibility in IT-Enabled Supply Chains , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[32]  Omar El Sawy,et al.  Absorptive Capacity Configurations in Supply Chains: Gearing for Partner-Enabled Market Knowledge Creation , 2005, MIS Q..

[33]  Arun Rai,et al.  Interfirm Strategic Information Flows in Logistics Supply Chain Relationships , 2009, MIS Q..

[34]  J. Dhaliwal,et al.  An investigation of resource-based and institutional theoretic factors in technology adoption for operations and supply chain management , 2009 .

[35]  K. Bollen,et al.  A tetrad test for causal indicators. , 2000, Psychological methods.

[36]  Radhika Santhanam,et al.  Issues in Linking Information Technology Capability to Firm Performance , 2003, MIS Q..

[37]  Robert G. Fichman,et al.  The Role of Aggregation in the Measurement of IT-Related Organizational Innovation , 2001, MIS Q..

[38]  Adamantios Diamantopoulos,et al.  The error term in formative measurement models: interpretation and modeling implications , 2006 .

[39]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[40]  Wynne W. Chin,et al.  A Partial Least Squares Latent Variable Modeling Approach for Measuring Interaction Effects: Results from a Monte Carlo Simulation Study and an Electronic - Mail Emotion/Adoption Study , 2003, Inf. Syst. Res..

[41]  Sree Nilakanta,et al.  Implementation of Electronic Data Interchange: An Innovation Diffusion Perspective , 1994, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[42]  J. Barney.  Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage , 1991 .

[43]  Kenneth L. Kraemer,et al.  Information Technology Payoff in E-Business Environments: An International Perspective on Value Creation of E-Business in the Financial Services Industry , 2004, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[44]  Yannis Bakos,et al.  A Strategic Analysis of Electronic Marketplaces , 1991, MIS Q..

[45]  Kenneth L. Kraemer,et al.  Review: Information Technology and Organizational Performance: An Integrative Model of IT Business Value , 2004, MIS Q..

[46]  Jonathan Wareham,et al.  Theoretical Foundations of Empirical Research on Interorganizational Systems: Assessing Past Contributions and Guiding Future Directions , 2008, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[47]  Vallabh Sambamurthy,et al.  Shaping UP for E-Commerce: Institutional Enablers of the Organizational Assimliation of Web Technologies , 2002, MIS Q..

[48]  C. Fornell,et al.  Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. , 1981 .

[49]  Robert G. Fichman,et al.  Going Beyond the Dominant Paradigm for Information Technology Innovation Research: Emerging Concepts and Methods , 2004, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[50]  Andreas Otto,et al.  Does supply chain management really pay? Six perspectives to measure the performance of managing a supply chain , 2003, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[51]  V. Sambamurthy,et al.  Information Technology Assimilation in Firms: The Influence of Senior Leadership and IT Infrastructures , 1999, Inf. Syst. Res..

[52]  Chris F. Kemerer,et al.  The assimilation of software process innovations: an organizational learning perspective , 1997 .

[53]  R. Zmud,et al.  Information technology implementation research: a technological diffusion approach , 1990 .

[54]  Scott B. MacKenzie,et al.  Construct Measurement and Validation Procedures in MIS and Behavioral Research: Integrating New and Existing Techniques , 2011, MIS Q..