Comparison of wrapper and filter feature selection algorithms on human activity recognition

Feature selection is an increasingly important part of machine learning. The purpose of feature selection is dimension reduction in a large multi-dimensional data set and it can be the key step of successful knowledge discovery in those problems where the number of features is large. This research area has huge practical significance because it accelerates decisions and improves performance. The requirements of specific applications in different kinds of research areas have led to the development of new feature selection techniques with different properties. In the last few decades, several feature selection algorithms have been proposed with their particular advantages and disadvantages. Despite of the intensive research and the large amount of works, the different kinds of feature selection algorithms have not been tested yet in the human activity recognition problem. It was the main motivation of our work and this paper tries to fill this gap. Therefore, in this article we present a conceptually simple naive Bayesian wrapper feature selection method and compare it with some widely used filter feature selection algorithms. The result of this work demonstrates that, the wrapper technique outperforms filter algorithms in this type of problem. In addition, this paper shows an example, when the classifier dependency of a wrapper method do not visible.

[1]  Lakhmi C. Jain,et al.  Feature Selection for Data and Pattern Recognition , 2014, Feature Selection for Data and Pattern Recognition.

[2]  Hsinchun Chen,et al.  Sentiment analysis in multiple languages: Feature selection for opinion classification in Web forums , 2008, TOIS.

[3]  Gavin C. Cawley,et al.  Gene Selection in Cancer Classification using Sparse Logistic Regression with Bayesian Regularisation , 2006 .

[4]  Hiroshi Motoda,et al.  Computational Methods of Feature Selection , 2022 .

[5]  Wei-Chang Yeh,et al.  Feature selection with Intelligent Dynamic Swarm and Rough Set , 2010, Expert Syst. Appl..

[6]  M. Young The technical writer's handbook : writing with style and clarity , 1989 .

[7]  Stephen R. Marsland,et al.  Machine Learning - An Algorithmic Perspective , 2009, Chapman and Hall / CRC machine learning and pattern recognition series.

[8]  Jane Labadin,et al.  Feature selection based on mutual information , 2015, 2015 9th International Conference on IT in Asia (CITA).

[9]  Thomas M. Cover,et al.  Elements of Information Theory , 2005 .

[10]  Andrew R. Webb,et al.  Statistical Pattern Recognition , 1999 .

[11]  Huan Liu,et al.  Spectral feature selection for supervised and unsupervised learning , 2007, ICML '07.

[12]  Lloyd A. Smith,et al.  Feature Selection for Machine Learning: Comparing a Correlation-Based Filter Approach to the Wrapper , 1999, FLAIRS.

[13]  Yiming Yang,et al.  A Comparative Study on Feature Selection in Text Categorization , 1997, ICML.

[14]  Musa Peker,et al.  A Comparative Study on Classification of Sleep Stage Based on EEG Signals Using Feature Selection and Classification Algorithms , 2014, Journal of Medical Systems.

[15]  Taghi M. Khoshgoftaar,et al.  Feature Selection with High-Dimensional Imbalanced Data , 2009, 2009 IEEE International Conference on Data Mining Workshops.

[16]  Huan Liu,et al.  Feature Selection: An Ever Evolving Frontier in Data Mining , 2010, FSDM.

[17]  Huan Liu,et al.  Advancing Feature Selection Research − ASU Feature Selection Repository , 2010 .

[18]  Fuhui Long,et al.  Feature selection based on mutual information criteria of max-dependency, max-relevance, and min-redundancy , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[19]  Isabelle Guyon,et al.  An Introduction to Variable and Feature Selection , 2003, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[20]  Jacek M. Zurada,et al.  Normalized Mutual Information Feature Selection , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks.

[21]  Deng Cai,et al.  Laplacian Score for Feature Selection , 2005, NIPS.

[22]  Allen Y. Yang,et al.  Distributed recognition of human actions using wearable motion sensor networks , 2009, J. Ambient Intell. Smart Environ..

[23]  Ahmed M. Elgammal,et al.  A Framework for Feature Selection for Background Subtraction , 2006, 2006 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR'06).

[24]  A. Karegowda,et al.  COMPARATIVE STUDY OF ATTRIBUTE SELECTION USING GAIN RATIO AND CORRELATION BASED FEATURE SELECTION , 2010 .

[25]  Yungho Leu,et al.  A novel hybrid feature selection method for microarray data analysis , 2011, Appl. Soft Comput..

[26]  Asha Gowda Karegowda,et al.  Feature Subset Selection Problem using Wrapper Approach in Supervised Learning , 2010 .

[27]  Miguel A. Labrador,et al.  A Survey on Human Activity Recognition using Wearable Sensors , 2013, IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials.

[28]  M. Narasimha Murty,et al.  Introduction To Pattern Recognition And Machine Learning , 2014 .

[29]  B. Schölkopf,et al.  Sparse Multinomial Logistic Regression via Bayesian L1 Regularisation , 2007 .

[30]  Jozsef Suto,et al.  Human activity recognition using neural networks , 2014, Proceedings of the 2014 15th International Carpathian Control Conference (ICCC).

[31]  Pedro Larrañaga,et al.  A review of feature selection techniques in bioinformatics , 2007, Bioinform..

[32]  Shaogang Gong,et al.  Feature selection on Gait Energy Image for human identification , 2008, 2008 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing.

[33]  Paul J. M. Havinga,et al.  A Survey of Online Activity Recognition Using Mobile Phones , 2015, Sensors.

[34]  József Sütő,et al.  Real time human activity monitoring , 2015 .

[35]  David Howard,et al.  A Comparison of Feature Extraction Methods for the Classification of Dynamic Activities From Accelerometer Data , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[36]  Jozsef Suto,et al.  Activity Recognition in Adaptive Assistive Systems Using Artificial Neural Networks , 2016 .

[37]  Ron Kohavi,et al.  Wrappers for Feature Subset Selection , 1997, Artif. Intell..