Analysis of confidence level scores from an ROC study: comparison of three mammographic systems for detection of simulated calcifications
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Andreas Koch,et al. Design and evaluation of a slot-scanning full-field digital mammography system , 2002, SPIE Medical Imaging.
[2] S Suryanarayanan,et al. Mammographic imaging with a small format CCD-based digital cassette: physical characteristics of a clinical system. , 2000, Medical physics.
[3] M L Giger,et al. Digital chest radiography: effect on diagnostic accuracy of hard copy, conventional video, and reversed gray scale video display formats. , 1988, Radiology.
[4] S Suryanarayanan,et al. Full breast digital mammography with an amorphous silicon-based flat panel detector: physical characteristics of a clinical prototype. , 2000, Medical physics.
[5] C E Ravin,et al. Effects of image processing on nodule detection rates in digitized chest radiographs: ROC study of observer performance. , 1988, Radiology.
[6] Srinivasan Vedantham,et al. Flat-panel digital mammography system: contrast-detail comparison between screen-film radiographs and hard-copy images. , 2002, Radiology.
[7] Peter G. J. Barten,et al. Contrast sensitivity of the human eye and its e ects on image quality , 1999 .
[8] Chris C. Shaw,et al. Comparison of a-Si:H/CsI flat-panel digital imaging systems with CR-and CCD-based systems: image quality measurements , 2001 .
[9] A R Cowen,et al. Visibility of microcalcifications in computed and screen-film mammography. , 1997, Physics in medicine and biology.
[10] H E Rockette,et al. Practical issues of experimental ROC analysis. Selection of controls. , 1990, Investigative radiology.
[11] J. Rowlands,et al. The physics of computed radiography. , 2002, Physics in medicine and biology.
[12] Kerry T. Krugh,et al. Microcalcification detectability for four mammographic detectors: flat-panel, CCD, CR, and screen/film). , 2002, Medical physics.