Factors affecting the therapeutic choice in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease. The Studio Lombardo Angiografia Multivasali (SLAM) Study Group.

OBJECTIVE: To assess how clinical and angiographic findings are related to the decision to carry out coronary angioplasty (PTCA) or coronary bypass grafting in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease. DESIGN: Prospective survey carried out in 14 centres in the Lombardia region of Italy. PATIENTS: 1468 consecutive patients under going coronary arteriography for known or suspected ischaemic heart disease between May and October 1994, who were found to have multivessel coronary artery disease. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Multivariate analysis was undertaken using stepwise logistic regression to identify the clinical and angiographic variables correlated with revascularisation (v medical treatment) in all of patients, and with surgery (v angioplasty) in the subset of revascularised patients. RESULTS: In all patients the clinical decision after coronary arteriography was made by physicians of each participating centre on the basis of their experience and clinical judgment: 53% of patients had bypass surgery, 28% had PTCA, and 19% continued medical treatment. The choice of a revascularisation procedure was directly related to a clinical diagnosis of unstable angina (P < < 0.001), the presence of left anterior descending artery disease (P < < 0.001), and to an ejection fraction > or = 40% (P < < 0.001), and inversely related to history of previous coronary bypass surgery (P < < 0.001). In revascularised patients, bypass surgery was the preferred treatment in patients with left anterior descending artery disease (P < < 0.001), three-vessel disease (P < < 0.001), and in those with at least one occluded vessel (P = 0.008). The choice of PTCA was significantly related to history of previous PTCA (P < < 0.001) or coronary bypass surgery (P < < 0.001), to a clinical diagnosis of non-Q wave myocardial infarction (P = 0.002), and to the possibility of implanting an intracoronary stent (P = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Bypass surgery is still the most widely used treatment for patients with multivessel coronary artery disease. This analysis provides a basis for comparison with future developments in the treatment of such patients. Further advancements in PTCA technology are needed to tilt the balance in favour of this less invasive procedure.

[1]  P. Walter,et al.  Coronary angioplasty versus coronary artery bypass surgery. , 1996, Israel journal of medical sciences.

[2]  R. Frye,et al.  Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation: patient screening, selection, and recruitment. , 1995, The American journal of cardiology.

[3]  T. Chalmers,et al.  Effect of coronary artery bypass graft surgery on survival: overview of 10-year results from randomised trials by the Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery Trialists Collaboration , 1994, The Lancet.

[4]  W Rutsch,et al.  A comparison of balloon-expandable-stent implantation with balloon angioplasty in patients with coronary artery disease. Benestent Study Group. , 1994, The New England journal of medicine.

[5]  Thomas J. Ryan,et al.  Guidelines for percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Assessment of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Cardiovascular Procedures (Committee on Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty). , 1993, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[6]  M. Leon,et al.  Emergent Use of Balloon‐Expandable Coronary Artery Stenting for Failed Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty , 1992, Circulation.

[7]  J. Vacek,et al.  Comparison of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty versus coronary artery bypass grafting for multivessel coronary artery disease. , 1992, American Journal of Cardiology.

[8]  P. Serruys,et al.  The Dutch experience in percutaneous transluminal angioplasty of narrowed saphenous veins used for aortocoronary arterial bypass. , 1991, The American journal of cardiology.

[9]  R. Gunnar Decision analysis in the evaluation of revascularization. , 1990, Annals of internal medicine.

[10]  T. Ryan Validation of a method for estimating success and complication rates of multivessel angioplasty. A key to the future. , 1990, Circulation.

[11]  E. Jones,et al.  Changing use of coronary angioplasty and coronary bypass surgery in the treatment of chronic coronary artery disease. , 1990, The American journal of cardiology.

[12]  B. Healy,et al.  Coronary artery bypass surgery vs coronary angioplasty: from antithesis to synthesis. , 1989, European heart journal.

[13]  U. Sigwart,et al.  Emergency stenting for acute occlusion after coronary balloon angioplasty. , 1988, Circulation.

[14]  P. Serruys,et al.  Coronary angioplasty for unstable angina. , 1988, Presse medicale.

[15]  T. Inoue,et al.  [Reoperation of coronary artery disease]. , 1984, Kyobu geka. The Japanese journal of thoracic surgery.

[16]  H Sandler,et al.  The use of single plane angiocardiograms for the calculation of left ventricular volume in man. , 1968, American heart journal.

[17]  P. Serruys,et al.  Emergency coronary angioplasty in refractory unstable angina. , 1985, The New England journal of medicine.

[18]  Eleven-year survival in the Veterans Administration randomized trial of coronary bypass surgery for stable angina. , 1984, The New England journal of medicine.