Evaluation of the sectional aerosol microphysics module SALSA implementation in ECHAM5-HAM aerosol-climate model

Abstract. We present the implementation and evaluation of a sectional aerosol microphysics module SALSA within the aerosol-climate model ECHAM5-HAM. This aerosol microphysics module has been designed to be flexible and computationally efficient so that it can be implemented in regional or global scale models. The computational efficiency has been achieved by minimising the number of variables needed to describe the size and composition distribution. The aerosol size distribution is described using 10 size classes with parallel sections which can have different chemical compositions. Thus in total, the module tracks 20 size sections which cover diameters ranging from 3 nm to 10 μm and are divided into three subranges, each with an optimised selection of processes and compounds. The implementation of SALSA into ECHAM5-HAM includes the main aerosol processes in the atmosphere: emissions, removal, radiative effects, liquid and gas phase sulphate chemistry, and the aerosol microphysics. The aerosol compounds treated in the module are sulphate, organic carbon, sea salt, black carbon, and mineral dust. In its default configuration, ECHAM5-HAM treats aerosol size distribution using the modal method. In this implementation, the aerosol processes were converted to be used in a sectional model framework. The ability of the module to describe the global aerosol properties was evaluated by comparing against (1) measured continental and marine size distributions, (2) observed variability of continental number concentrations, (3) measured sulphate, organic carbon, black carbon and sea-salt mass concentrations, (4) observations of aerosol optical depth (AOD) and other aerosol optical properties from satellites and AERONET network, (5) global aerosol budgets and concentrations from previous model studies, and (6) model results using M7, which is the default aerosol microphysics module in ECHAM5-HAM. The evaluation shows that the global aerosol properties can be reproduced reasonably well using a coarse resolution of 10 sections in size space. The simulated global aerosol budgets are within the range of previous studies. Surface concentrations of sulphate and carbonaceous species have an annual mean within a factor of two of the observations. The simulated sea-salt concentrations reproduce the observations within a factor of two, apart from the Southern Ocean over which the concentrations are within a factor of five. Regionally, AOD is in a relatively good agreement with the observations (within a factor of two). At mid-latitudes the observed AOD is captured well, while at high-latitudes as well as in some polluted and dust regions the modelled AOD is significantly lower than observed. Regarding most of the investigated aerosol properties, the SALSA and the modal aerosol module M7 perform comparably well against observations. However, SALSA reproduces the observed number concentrations and the size distribution of CCN sized particles much more accurately than M7, and is therefore a good choice for aerosol-cloud interaction studies in global models. Our study also shows that when activation type nucleation in the boundary layer is included, the observed concentration of particles under 50 nm in diameter are reproduced much better compared to when only binary nucleation in the free troposphere is assumed.

[1]  U. Lohmann,et al.  Bacteria in the ECHAM5-HAM global climate model , 2012 .

[2]  K. Lehtinen,et al.  Direct and indirect effects of sea spray geoengineering and the role of injected particle size , 2012 .

[3]  A.J.H. Visschedijk,et al.  General overview: European Integrated project on Aerosol Cloud Climate and Air Quality interactions (EUCAARI) - integrating aerosol research from nano to global scales , 2011 .

[4]  K. Tsigaridis,et al.  Estimating the direct and indirect effects of secondary organic aerosols using ECHAM5-HAM , 2011 .

[5]  Keywan Riahi,et al.  Evolution of anthropogenic and biomass burning emissions of air pollutants at global and regional scales during the 1980–2010 period , 2011 .

[6]  A. Robinson,et al.  The influence of semi-volatile and reactive primary emissions on the abundance and properties of global organic aerosol , 2011 .

[7]  C. O'Dowd,et al.  Number size distributions and seasonality of submicron particles in europe 2008–2009 , 2011 .

[8]  C. O'Dowd,et al.  Production flux of sea spray aerosol , 2011 .

[9]  Z. Jurányi,et al.  A 17 month climatology of the cloud condensation nuclei number concentration at the high alpine site Jungfraujoch , 2011 .

[10]  I. Bey,et al.  Pollution transport efficiency toward the Arctic: Sensitivity to aerosol scavenging and source regions , 2011 .

[11]  I. Riipinen,et al.  Organic condensation: a vital link connecting aerosol formation to cloud condensation nuclei (CCN) concentrations , 2011 .

[12]  Nadine Gobron,et al.  Global-Scale Comparison of MISR and MODIS Land Surface Albedos , 2011 .

[13]  C. Belis,et al.  Sources of carbonaceous aerosol in the Amazon basin , 2010 .

[14]  T. Petäjä,et al.  Seasonal variation of CCN concentrations and aerosol activation properties in boreal forest , 2010 .

[15]  U. Lohmann,et al.  Aerosol nucleation and its role for clouds and Earth's radiative forcing in the aerosol-climate model ECHAM5-HAM , 2010 .

[16]  T. Eck,et al.  Global evaluation of the Collection 5 MODIS dark-target aerosol products over land , 2010 .

[17]  Martyn P. Chipperfield,et al.  Description and evaluation of GLOMAP-mode: a modal global aerosol microphysics model for the UKCA composition-climate model , 2010 .

[18]  Philip Stier,et al.  Description and evaluation of GMXe: a new aerosol submodel for global simulations (v1) , 2010 .

[19]  Brent N. Holben,et al.  An analysis of the collection 5 MODIS over-ocean aerosol optical depth product for its implication in aerosol assimilation , 2010 .

[20]  Robert C. Levy,et al.  Evaluating the assumptions of surface reflectance and aerosol type selection within the MODIS aerosol retrieval over land: The problem of dust type selection , 2010 .

[21]  Xiaohong Liu,et al.  Tropospheric aerosol size distributions simulated by three online global aerosol models using the M7 microphysics module , 2010 .

[22]  K. Lehtinen,et al.  Parameterizing the formation rate of new particles: The effect of nuclei self-coagulation , 2010 .

[23]  R. Kahn,et al.  Reply to ''Comments on 'Why Hasn't Earth Warmed as Much as Expected?''' , 2012 .

[24]  G. Mann,et al.  Explaining global surface aerosol number concentrations in terms of primary emissions and particle formation , 2009 .

[25]  M. Chin,et al.  Evaluation of black carbon estimations in global aerosol models , 2009 .

[26]  J. Lamarque,et al.  Aerosol indirect effects – general circulation model intercomparison and evaluation with satellite data , 2009 .

[27]  Gunnar Myhre,et al.  Consistency Between Satellite-Derived and Modeled Estimates of the Direct Aerosol Effect , 2009, Science.

[28]  J. Seinfeld,et al.  Effect of chemistry-aerosol-climate coupling on predictions of future climate and future levels of tropospheric ozone and aerosols , 2009 .

[29]  M. Komppula,et al.  Measurements of the relation between aerosol properties and microphysics and chemistry of low level liquid water clouds in Northern Finland , 2008 .

[30]  R. Ruedy,et al.  MATRIX (Multiconfiguration Aerosol TRacker of mIXing state): an aerosol microphysical module for global atmospheric models , 2008 .

[31]  Mian Chin,et al.  A multi-model assessment of pollution transport to the Arctic , 2008 .

[32]  K. Carslaw,et al.  A global model study of processes controlling aerosol size distributions in the Arctic spring and summer , 2008 .

[33]  U. Lohmann,et al.  Aerosol processing in mixed‐phase clouds in ECHAM5‐HAM: Model description and comparison to observations , 2008 .

[34]  Ari Asmi,et al.  SALSA – a Sectional Aerosol module for Large Scale Applications , 2007 .

[35]  K. Lehtinen,et al.  Estimating nucleation rates from apparent particle formation rates and vice versa: Revised formulation of the Kerminen–Kulmala equation , 2007 .

[36]  U. Lohmann,et al.  Cloud microphysics and aerosol indirect effects in the global climate model ECHAM5-HAM , 2007 .

[37]  Steven J. Ghan,et al.  Aerosol Properties and Processes: A Path from Field and Laboratory Measurements to Global Climate Models , 2007 .

[38]  Gregory G. Leptoukh,et al.  Online analysis enhances use of NASA Earth science data , 2007 .

[39]  I. Riipinen,et al.  Connections between atmospheric sulphuric acid and new particle formation during QUEST III–IV campaigns in Heidelberg and Hyytiälä , 2006 .

[40]  Patrick Jöckel,et al.  Technical Note: An implementation of the dry removal processes DRY DEPosition and SEDImentation in the Modular Earth Submodel System (MESSy) , 2006 .

[41]  Tami C. Bond,et al.  Emissions of primary aerosol and precursor gases in the years 2000 and 1750 prescribed data-sets for AeroCom , 2006 .

[42]  Frank Arnold,et al.  Atmospheric sulphuric acid and aerosol formation : implications from atmospheric measurements for nucleation and early growth mechanisms , 2006 .

[43]  T. Tuch,et al.  Size distributions of non-volatile particle residuals (D p <800 nm) at a rural site in Germany and relation to air mass origin , 2006 .

[44]  Ari Laaksonen,et al.  Cluster activation theory as an explanation of the linear dependence between formation rate of 3nm particles and sulphuric acid concentration , 2006 .

[45]  B. Sportisse,et al.  Development and Preliminary Validation of a Modal Aerosol Model for Tropospheric Chemistry: MAM , 2006 .

[46]  A. Sterl,et al.  The ERA‐40 re‐analysis , 2005 .

[47]  J. Penner,et al.  Global modeling of aerosol dynamics: Model description, evaluation, and interactions between sulfate and nonsulfate aerosols , 2005 .

[48]  Axel Lauer,et al.  © Author(s) 2006. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics Analysis and quantification of the diversities of aerosol life cycles , 2022 .

[49]  Martyn P. Chipperfield,et al.  A global off-line model of size-resolved aerosol microphysics: I. Model development and prediction of aerosol properties , 2005 .

[50]  B. Holben,et al.  A global view of aerosols from merged transport models, satellite, and ground observations : Global aerosol system , 2005 .

[51]  Kathleen A. Crean,et al.  Multiangle imaging spectroradiometer (MISR) global aerosol optical depth validation based on 2 years of coincident Aerosol Robotic Network (AERONET) observations : Global aerosol system , 2005 .

[52]  Michael Schulz,et al.  Estimates of global multicomponent aerosol optical depth and direct radiative perturbation in the Laboratoire de Météorologie Dynamique general circulation model , 2005 .

[53]  E. Vermote,et al.  The MODIS Aerosol Algorithm, Products, and Validation , 2005 .

[54]  H. Hansson,et al.  An investigation of processes controlling the evolution of the boundary layer aerosol size distribution properties at the Swedish background station Aspvreten , 2004 .

[55]  J. Wilson,et al.  M7: An efficient size‐resolved aerosol microphysics module for large‐scale aerosol transport models , 2004 .

[56]  P. Hari,et al.  Nucleation rate and vapor concentration estimations using a least squares aerosol dynamics method , 2004 .

[57]  Thomas W. Kirchstetter,et al.  Evidence that the spectral dependence of light absorption by aerosols is affected by organic carbon , 2004 .

[58]  O. Boucher,et al.  The aerosol-climate model ECHAM5-HAM , 2004 .

[59]  C. Timmreck,et al.  Significant dust simulation differences in nudged and climatological operation mode of the AGCM ECHAM , 2004 .

[60]  Xiaojun Yuan,et al.  High-wind-speed evaluation in the Southern Ocean , 2004 .

[61]  S. Gong,et al.  A parameterization of sea‐salt aerosol source function for sub‐ and super‐micron particles , 2003 .

[62]  C. Timmreck,et al.  Monthly Averages of Aerosol Properties: A Global Comparison Among Models, Satellite Data, and AERONET Ground Data , 2003 .

[63]  F. Binkowski,et al.  Models-3 community multiscale air quality (cmaq) model aerosol component , 2003 .

[64]  C. Timmreck,et al.  An improved parameterization for sulfuric acid-water nucleation rates for tropospheric and stratospheric conditions , 2002 .

[65]  M. Heimann,et al.  Impact of vegetation and preferential source areas on global dust aerosol: Results from a model study , 2002 .

[66]  M. Facchini,et al.  Water‐soluble organic compounds in biomass burning aerosols over Amazonia 2. Apportionment of the chemical composition and importance of the polyacidic fraction , 2002 .

[67]  M. Facchini,et al.  Water‐soluble organic compounds in biomass burning aerosols over Amazonia 1. Characterization by NMR and GC‐MS , 2002 .

[68]  M. Jacobson.  Analysis of aerosol interactions with numerical techniques for solving coagulation, nucleation, condensation, dissolution, and reversible chemistry among multiple size distributions , 2002 .

[69]  John H. Seinfeld,et al.  Predicting global aerosol size distributions in general circulation models , 2002 .

[70]  U. Lohmann,et al.  A study of internal and external mixing scenarios and its effect on aerosol optical properties and direct radiative forcing , 2002 .

[71]  M. Kulmala,et al.  Analytical formulae connecting the “real” and the “apparent” nucleation rate and the nuclei number concentration for atmospheric nucleation events , 2002 .

[72]  M. Schulz,et al.  Influence of the source formulation on modeling the atmospheric global distribution of sea salt aerosol , 2001 .

[73]  T. Eck,et al.  An emerging ground-based aerosol climatology: Aerosol optical depth from AERONET , 2001 .

[74]  J. Lamarque,et al.  A global simulation of tropospheric ozone and related tracers: Description and evaluation of MOZART, version 2 , 2001 .

[75]  M. Jacobson.  Global direct radiative forcing due to multicomponent anthropogenic and natural aerosols , 2001 .

[76]  A. Watson,et al.  In situ evaluation of air‐sea gas exchange parameterizations using novel conservative and volatile tracers , 2000 .

[77]  R. Dingenen,et al.  Size distribution and chemical composition of marine aerosols: a compilation and review , 2000 .

[78]  E. L. Andreas.  A New Sea Spray Generation Function for Wind Speeds up to 32 m s−1 , 1998 .

[79]  R. Andres,et al.  A time‐averaged inventory of subaerial volcanic sulfur emissions , 1998 .

[80]  A. Smirnov,et al.  AERONET-a federated instrument network and data archive for aerosol Characterization , 1998 .

[81]  J. Seinfeld,et al.  Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics: From Air Pollution to Climate Change , 1998 .

[82]  Mark Z. Jacobson,et al.  Fundamentals of atmospheric modeling , 1998 .

[83]  M. Smith,et al.  The sea spray generation function , 1998 .

[84]  Bernard Pinty,et al.  Techniques for the retrieval of aerosol properties over land and ocean using multiangle imaging , 1998, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[85]  P. Koepke,et al.  Optical Properties of Aerosols and Clouds: The Software Package OPAC , 1998 .

[86]  J. Lelieveld,et al.  A dry deposition parameterization for sulfur oxides in a chemistry and general circulation model , 1998 .

[87]  Shian‐Jiann Lin,et al.  Multidimensional Flux-Form Semi-Lagrangian Transport Schemes , 1996 .

[88]  Lennart Bengtsson,et al.  On the potential of assimilating meteorological analyses in a global climate model for the purpose of model validation , 1996 .

[89]  Johann Feichter,et al.  Simulation of the tropospheric sulfur cycle in a global climate model , 1996 .

[90]  G. Brasseur,et al.  A three-dimensional study of the tropospheric sulfur cycle , 1995 .

[91]  J. Lelieveld,et al.  Dry deposition parameterization in a chemistry general circulation model and its influence on the distribution of reactive trace gases. , 1995 .

[92]  T. Ackerman,et al.  Algorithms for the calculation of scattering by stratified spheres. , 1981, Applied optics.

[93]  E. Shettle,et al.  Models for the aerosols of the lower atmosphere and the effects of humidity variations on their optical properties , 1979 .

[94]  M. Querry,et al.  Optical Constants of Water in the Infrared , 1971 .

[95]  R. Robinson,et al.  Interactions in Aqueous Nonelectrolyte Solutions. I. Solute-Solvent Equilibria , 1966 .

[96]  Eero Nikinmaa,et al.  Station for Measuring Ecosystem-Atmosphere Relations: SMEAR , 2013 .

[97]  Luis Kornblueh,et al.  The atmospheric general circulation model ECHAM5 Part II: Sensitivity of simulated climate to horizontal and vertical resolution , 2004 .

[98]  Wojciech W. Grabowski,et al.  Hierarchical modelling of tropical convective systems using explicit and parametrized approaches , 2001 .

[99]  J. Seinfeld,et al.  Simulation of Aerosol Dynamics: A Comparative Review of Algorithms Used in Air Quality Models , 1999 .

[100]  M. Jacobson.  Development and application of a new air pollution modeling system—II. Aerosol module structure and design , 1997 .

[101]  M. Jacobson.  Numerical Techniques to Solve Condensational and Dissolutional Growth Equations When Growth is Coupled to Reversible Reactions , 1997 .

[102]  S. Jennings,et al.  Physical characteristics of the ambient aerosol at Mace Head , 1991 .

[103]  D. E. Spiel,et al.  A Model of Marine Aerosol Generation Via Whitecaps and Wave Disruption , 1986 .