Boundary Objects and Group Analysis: Between Psychoanalysis and Social Theory

This paper explores possible connections between recent developments in social theory and group analysis, which could also have consequences for the conceptualization of group-analytic practice. Drawing on discussions from the sociology of scientific knowledge, specifically studies in sciences and technology, I offer an account and partial appropriation of some features of actor network theory. The concept of ‘boundary object’ is explored, through an attention to potential psychodynamic readings of these ideas and application to psychotherapeutic contexts. I also explore the interpretive potential of such frameworks to group-analytic approaches, in terms of offering analytic tools for the conceptualization of its practice within material, discursive and political contexts.

[1]  W. Bion,et al.  Experiences in groups. , 1961, Human relations; studies towards the integration of the social sciences.

[2]  D. Winnicott.  Transitional Objects and Transitional Phenomena 1951 , 1951 .

[3]  E. Bick.  The experience of the skin in early object-relations. , 2018, The International journal of psycho-analysis.

[4]  D. Winnicott.  Playing and Reality , 1971 .

[5]  M. Foucault,et al.  Technologies of the Self: A Seminar with Michel Foucault , 1988 .

[6]  M. Callon,et al.  Mapping the dynamics of science and technology : sociology of science in the real world , 1988 .

[7]  J. Johnson.  Mixing Humans and Nonhumans Together: The Sociology of a Door-Closer , 1988 .

[8]  Susan Leigh Star,et al.  Institutional Ecology, `Translations' and Boundary Objects: Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907-39 , 1989 .

[9]  J. Law.  Introduction: Monsters, Machines and Sociotechnical Relations , 1990 .

[10]  E. Burman,et al.  Psychology discourse practice : from regulation to resistance , 1996 .

[11]  Farhad Dalal.  Taking the Group Seriously: Towards a Post-Foulkesian Group Analytic Theory , 1998 .

[12]  Diane Paul,et al.  A double-edged sword , 2000, Nature.

[13]  E. Burman,et al.  A double-edged sword: understanding gifts in psychotherapy , 2000 .

[14]  R. Stacey.  Reflexivity, Self-Organization and Emergence in the Group Matrix , 2000 .

[15]  E. Burman.  Engendering authority in the group , 2001 .

[16]  R. Stacey.  Complexity and the Group Matrix , 2001 .

[17]  E. Burman.  Gender, Sexuality and Power in Groups , 2002 .

[18]  E. Hopper,et al.  The Social Unconscious: Selected Papers , 2002 .

[19]  Henry G. Small,et al.  Mapping the dynamics of science and technology , 1988, Scientometrics.