Prosodic boundary strength: An articulatory and perceptual study

This study examines the production and perception of Intonational Phrase (IP) boundaries. In particular, it investigates (1) whether the articulatory events that occur at IP boundaries can exhibit temporal distinctions that would indicate a difference in degree of disjuncture, and (2) to what extent listeners are sensitive to the effects of such differences among IP boundaries. Two experiments investigate these questions. An articulatory kinematic experiment examines the effects of structural differences between IP boundaries on the production of those boundaries. In a perception experiment listeners then evaluate the strength of the junctures occurring in the utterances produced in the production study. The results of the studies provide support for the existence of prosodic strength differences among IP boundaries and also demonstrate a close link between the production and perception of prosodic boundaries. The results are discussed in the context of possible linguistic structural explanations, with implications for cognitive accounts for the creation, implementation, and processing of prosody.

[1]  Colin W. Wightman,et al.  Segmental durations in the vicinity of prosodic phrase boundaries. , 1992, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[2]  Dani Byrd,et al.  The elastic phrase: modeling the dynamics of boundary-adjacent lengthening , 2003, J. Phonetics.

[3]  P. Perrier,et al.  What role does the palate play in speech motor control? Insights from tongue kinematics for German alveolar obstruents , 2003 .

[4]  Hosung Nam,et al.  Pitch accommodation in synchronous speech. , 2009 .

[5]  A. Christophea,et al.  Phonological phrase boundaries constrain lexical access I . Adult data q , 2003 .

[6]  Junko Ito,et al.  The extended prosodic word , 2009 .

[7]  L. Goldstein,et al.  Manifestation of prosodic structure in articulatory variation: Evidence from lip kinematics in English , 2006 .

[8]  M. Beckman,et al.  The articulatory kinematics of final lengthening. , 1991, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[9]  C. Clifton,et al.  Prosodic Boundaries in Adjunct Attachment , 2001 .

[10]  Michael Wagner,et al.  Prosody and recursion in coordinate structures and beyond , 2010 .

[11]  Taehong Cho,et al.  The Use of Domain-initial Strengthening in Segmentation of Continuous English Speech , 2003 .

[12]  D. Robert Ladd,et al.  Intonational phrasing: the case for recursive prosodic structure , 1986, Phonology.

[13]  M. Swerts.  Prosodic features at discourse boundaries of different strength. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[14]  P. Keating,et al.  Articulatory strengthening at edges of prosodic domains. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[15]  G. Ayers,et al.  Guidelines for ToBI labelling , 1994 .

[16]  Jelena Krivokapic,et al.  Prosodic planning: Effects of phrasal length and complexity on pause duration , 2007, J. Phonetics.

[17]  David R. Dowty.  Thematic proto-roles and argument selection , 1991 .

[18]  Jelena Krivokapic.  The planning, production, and perception of prosodic structure , 2007 .

[19]  Elisabeth Selkirk,et al.  On clause and intonational phrase in Japanese: the syntactic grounding of prosodic constituent structure (特集 言語構造のインターフェイス) , 2009 .

[20]  P. Keating,et al.  A Prosodic View of Word Form Encoding for Speech Production , 2002 .

[21]  N. Lowe,et al.  A critical review of visual analogue scales in the measurement of clinical phenomena. , 1990, Research in nursing & health.

[22]  F. Ferreira.  Creation of prosody during sentence production. , 1993, Psychological review.

[23]  Bruce Hayes,et al.  THE PROSODIC HIERARCHY IN METER , 1989 .

[24]  A. Schafer.  Prosodic parsing: The role of prosody in sentence comprehension , 1997 .

[25]  Stefanie Shattuck-Hufnagel,et al.  The original ToBI system and the evolution of the ToBI framework , 2003 .

[26]  Dani Byrd,et al.  Intragestural dynamics of multiple prosodic boundaries , 1998 .

[27]  J. Cole,et al.  Please Scroll down for Article Language and Cognitive Processes the Role of Syntactic Structure in Guiding Prosody Perception with Ordinary Listeners and Everyday Speech the Role of Syntactic Structure in Guiding Prosody Perception with Ordinary Listeners and Everyday Speech , 2022 .

[28]  D. Ladd.  Declination ‘‘reset’’ and the hierarchical organization of utterances , 1988 .

[29]  Shrikanth S. Narayanan,et al.  Phrasal signatures in articulation , 2000 .

[30]  Michael Wagner,et al.  Relative Prosodic Boundary Strength and Prior Bias in Disambiguation , 2010 .

[31]  M. Tabain.  Effects of prosodic boundary on /aC/ sequences: articulatory results. , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[32]  Petra Hansson,et al.  Prosodic Phrasing in Spontaneous Swedish , 2003 .

[33]  Tae-Jin Yoon,et al.  A Predictive Model of Prosody Through Grammatical Interface: A computational Approach , 2009 .

[34]  J. Pierrehumbert,et al.  Intonational structure in Japanese and English , 1986, Phonology.

[35]  Haruo Kubozono.  Gesture, Segment, Prosody: Modeling syntactic effects on downstep in Japanese , 1992 .

[36]  Ann Cutler,et al.  Prosody in the Comprehension of Spoken Language: A Literature Review , 1997, Language and speech.

[37]  Hisao Tokizaki.  Prosodic Hierarchy and Prosodic Boundary , 2002 .

[38]  Louis Goldstein,et al.  Perceived prosody: Phonetic bases of prominence and boundaries. , 2008 .

[39]  Mari Ostendorf,et al.  The use of prosody in syntactic disambiguation , 1991 .

[40]  E. Selkirk.  On derived domains in sentence phonology , 1986, Phonology.

[41]  Caroline L. Smith.  PROSODIC ACCOMMODATION BY FRENCH SPEAKERS TO A NON-NATIVE INTERLOCUTOR , 2007 .

[42]  J. Mehler,et al.  Phonological phrase boundaries constrain lexical access II. Infant data , 2004 .

[43]  Aoju Chen,et al.  How to obtain and process perceptual judgements of intonational meaning , 2006 .

[44]  Hugo Quené,et al.  Recursion in phonology , 2009 .

[45]  Dani Byrd,et al.  Relating Prosody and Dynamic Events , 2003 .

[46]  S. Jun,et al.  Prosodic Phrasing and Attachment Preferences , 2003, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[47]  John Kingston,et al.  Papers in Laboratory Phonology: Index of names , 1990 .

[48]  Sankaranarayanan Ananthakrishnan,et al.  Gradiency and categoricity in prosodic boundary production and perception , 2007 .

[49]  Rebeka Campos-Astorkiza.  Italian Raddoppiamento: Prosodic effects on length , 2004 .

[50]  Estelle Campione,et al.  A large-scale multilingual study of silent pause duration , 2002, Speech Prosody 2002.

[51]  Jelena Krivokapic,et al.  Prosodic interaction between speakers of American and British English. , 2010 .

[52]  J. Pierrehumbert.  The phonology and phonetics of English intonation , 1987 .

[53]  Alan S. Prince,et al.  Generalized alignment , 1993 .

[54]  Sungbok Lee,et al.  How far, how long: on the temporal scope of prosodic boundary effects. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[55]  B. Dresher.  THE PROSODIC BASIS OF THE TIBERIAN HEBREW SYSTEM OF ACCENTS , 1994 .

[56]  M. Kjelgaard,et al.  Prosodic Facilitation and Interference in the Resolution of Temporary Syntactic Closure Ambiguity , 1999 .

[57]  Fredericka Bell‐Berti,et al.  Producing Speech: Contemporary Issues for Katherine Safford Harris , 1997 .

[58]  D. Klatt.  Vowel Lengthening is Syntactically Determined in a Connected Discourse. , 1975 .

[59]  Rpg Rene Collier,et al.  Prosodic phrasing at the sentence level , 1995 .

[60]  P. Hoole,et al.  Jaw and Order , 2007, Language and speech.

[61]  Dani Byrd,et al.  Articulatory Vowel Lengthening and Coordination at Phrasal Junctures , 2000, Phonetica.

[62]  Anne Pier Salverda,et al.  The role of prosodic boundaries in the resolution of lexical embedding in speech comprehension , 2003, Cognition.

[63]  Svante Granqvist.  Enhancements to the Visual Analogue Scale, VAS, for listening tests , 2007 .

[64]  Stuart Parsons,et al.  136th Meeting of the Acoustical Society of America. Norfolk, Virginia, USA. 12-16 October 1998. Abstracts. , 1998, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[65]  F. Ferreira.  Effects of length and syntactic complexity on initiation times for prepared utterances , 1991 .

[66]  Jelena Krivokapi.  Prosodic Planning: Effects of Phrasal Length and Complexity on Pause Duration. , 2007, Journal of phonetics.

[67]  C. Clifton,et al.  Prosodic phrasing is central to language comprehension , 2006, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[68]  Stefanie Shattuck-Hufnagel,et al.  A prosody tutorial for investigators of auditory sentence processing , 1996, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[69]  F. Ferreira,et al.  The role of working memory in syntactic ambiguity resolution: a psychometric approach. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[70]  D. K. Oller,et al.  The effect of position in utterance on speech segment duration in English. , 1973, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[71]  T. Mexia,et al.  Author ' s personal copy , 2009 .

[72]  Amalia Arvaniti,et al.  Postlexical Rules and Gestural Overlap in a Greek Spoken Corpus , 2002 .

[73]  C. Gussenhoven,et al.  Intonation contours, prosodic structure and preboundary lengthening , 1992 .

[74]  Junko Ito,et al.  Weak Layering and Word Binarity , 2003 .

[75]  Stefanie Shattuck-Hufnagel,et al.  Multiple targets of phrase-final lengthening in American English words , 2007, J. Phonetics.

[76]  Angelien Sanderman,et al.  On the perceptual strength of prosodic boundaries and its relation to suprasegmental cues , 1994 .

[77]  Elisabeth Selkirk,et al.  The Prosodic Structure of Function Words , 2008 .

[78]  Taehong Cho,et al.  Prosodically driven phonetic detail in speech processing: The case of domain-initial strengthening in English , 2007, J. Phonetics.