Management procedures in a fishery based on highly variable stocks and with conflicting objectives: experiences in the South African pelagic fishery

The pelagic fishery in South Africa targets mainly anchovy, Engraulis capensis, and sardine, Sardinops sagax, both of which have varied substantially in abundance during the history of the fishery. Since 1988, there has been progress in this fishery towards the use of management procedures as the basis for determination of management regulations, where a management procedure is defined as a set of rules, derived by simulation and normally implemented for three to five years, specifying how the regulatory mechanism is set, the data collected for this purpose and how these data are to be analysed and used. Advantages of management procedures include formal consideration of uncertainty, the ability to choose decision rules based on their predicted medium-term consequences and a saving in workload compared with annual assessments.This paper discusses the lessons learned in application of management procedures and their precursors in this fishery. The high variability in abundance of the two stocks, the trend in their relative abundance, the substantial uncertainties in information, strong pressure to meet socio-economic goals and the conflicting objectives which arose between the directed anchovy and directed sardine fishery are identified as major problems in implementation of procedures and management of the resources. However, the use of management procedures is considered to have led to greatly improved communication with the industry and to substantial input by them into the management process. The procedures and the simulations upon which they were based also enabled consideration of the major sources of uncertainty in understanding of the resource dynamics and facilitated the development of procedures that were robust to them.It is argued that biological uncertainty greatly exacerbated the problems in application of the procedures but probably cannot be markedly reduced in the near future. Management procedures must be robust to likely variability and uncertainty. Of equal importance are identification and selection of achievable objectives, and allocation to the political decision makers and not to the scientists, of responsibility for determining acceptable trade-offs between conservation and socio-economic goals. Other issues, including the importance of long-term rights and allowance for flexibility in fishing practice, are also highlighted

[1]  L. P. Schultz,et al.  Fishing in troubled waters , 1949 .

[2]  Doug S Butterworth,et al.  Towards rational harvesting of the South African anchovy considering survey imprecision and recruitment variability , 1987 .

[3]  L. Talbot Living resource conservation : an international overview , 1996 .

[4]  C. Walters,et al.  Uncertainty, resource exploitation, and conservation: lessons from history. , 1993, Science.

[5]  M. Orbach Fishing in Troubled Waters , 1980 .

[6]  Donald Ludwig,et al.  Uncertainty, Resource Exploitation, and Conservation: Lessons from History. , 1993, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[7]  Carl J. Walters,et al.  Differing Goals of Salmon Management on the Skeena River , 1977 .

[8]  John M. Hoenig,et al.  A simple simulation approach to risk and cost analysis, with applications to swordfish and cod fisheries , 1992 .

[9]  R. Hilborn,et al.  Evaluation of a management decision rule for a New Zealand rock lobster substock , 1997 .

[10]  R. Crawford,et al.  The Benguela ecosystem. IV: The major fish and invertebrate resources , 1987 .

[11]  Ellen P. Pikitch,et al.  Objectives for Biologically and Technically Interrelated Fisheries , 1988 .

[12]  A. Charles Fishery science: the study of fishery systems , 1995 .

[13]  James Allan A defence of the status quo , 2003 .

[14]  André E. Punt,et al.  Selecting management methodologies for marine resources, with an illustration for southern African hake , 1992 .

[15]  Anthony Charles,et al.  Fishery conflicts: A unified framework , 1992 .

[16]  K. Cochrane,et al.  People, purses and power: developing fisheries policy for the new South Africa , 1998 .

[17]  Svein Jentoft,et al.  Fisheries co-management: Delegating government responsibility to fishermen's organizations☆☆☆ , 1989 .

[18]  Garry D. Brewer,et al.  The Wider Dimensions of Management Uncertainty in World Fisheries , 1984 .

[19]  Carl Walters,et al.  Lessons for stock assessment from the northern cod collapse , 1996, Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries.

[20]  Steen Christensen,et al.  Evaluation of management strategies - a bioeconomic approach applied to the Greenland Shrimp Fishery , 1997 .

[21]  Ray Hilborn,et al.  Current Trends in Including Risk and Uncertainty in Stock Assessment and Harvest Decisions , 1993 .

[22]  D. Matthews Commons versus Open Access: The Collapse of Canada's East Coast Fishery. , 1995 .

[23]  A. Charles Towards sustainability: the fishery experience , 1994 .

[24]  G. Stefansson,et al.  On the rational utilization of the Icelandic cod stock , 1996 .

[25]  André E. Punt,et al.  A Bayesian Approach to Stock Assessment and Harvest Decisions Using the Sampling/Importance Resampling Algorithm , 1994 .

[26]  J. Beddington,et al.  Achieving sustainable use of renewable resources. , 1993, Science.

[27]  P. Shelton,et al.  An overview of the application of the daily egg production method in the assessment and management of anchovy in the Southeast Atlantic : Ichthyoplankton methods for estimating fish biomass , 1993 .

[28]  B. Shuter,et al.  Toward a definition of conservation principles for fisheries management , 1997 .

[29]  Colin W. Clark,et al.  Management of Multispecies Fisheries , 1979, Science.

[30]  K. Cochrane,et al.  SOUTH AFRICA'S OFFSHORE LIVING MARINE RESOURCES: THE SCIENTIFIC BASIS FOR MANAGEMENT OF THE FISHERIES , 1997 .

[31]  P. Pearse,et al.  Fishing rights and fishing policy: the development of property rights as instruments of fisheries management. , 1994 .

[32]  S. Garcia,et al.  CURRENT SITUATION, TRENDS AND PROSPECTS IN WORLD CAPTURE FISHERIES' , 1995 .

[33]  L. Shannon The Benguela ecosystem. III: Plankton , 1986 .

[34]  R. I. C. C. Francis,et al.  Use of Risk Analysis to Assess Fishery Management Strategies: A Case Study using Orange Roughy (Hoplostethus atlanticus) on the Chatham Rise, New Zealand , 1992 .

[35]  A. Punt,et al.  Biology and fisheries of South African Cape hakes (M. capensis and M. paradoxus) , 1995 .

[36]  Robert L. Stephenson,et al.  Fisheries Management Sciences: a plea for conceptual change , 1995 .