Correspondences between low‐energy modes in enzymes: Dynamics‐based alignment of enzymatic functional families

Proteins that show similarity in their equilibrium dynamics can be aligned by identifying regions that undergo similar concerted movements. These movements are computed from protein native structures using coarse‐grained elastic network models. We show the existence of common large‐scale movements in enzymes selected from the main functional and structural classes. Alignment via dynamics does not require prior detection of sequence or structural correspondence. Indeed, a third of the statistically significant dynamics‐based alignments involve enzymes that lack substantial global or local structural similarities. The analysis of specific residue–residue correspondences of these structurally dissimilar enzymes in some cases suggests a functional relationship of the detected common dynamic features. Including dynamics‐based criteria in protein alignment thus provides a promising avenue for relating and grouping enzymes in terms of dynamic aspects that often, though not always, assist or accompany biological function.

[1]  J. I. Sulkowska,et al.  Predicting the order in which contacts are broken during single molecule protein stretching experiments , 2008, Proteins.

[2]  Claudio Luchinat,et al.  Essential dynamics of helices provide a functional classification of EF-hand proteins. , 2007, Journal of proteome research.

[3]  D. Thirumalai,et al.  Allosteric transitions in the chaperonin GroEL are captured by a dominant normal mode that is most robust to sequence variations. , 2007, Biophysical journal.

[4]  C. Micheletti,et al.  Structural and dynamical alignment of enzymes with partial structural similarity , 2007 .

[5]  Sophie Sacquin-Mora,et al.  Locating the active sites of enzymes using mechanical properties , 2007, Proteins.

[6]  C Micheletti,et al.  Anharmonicity and self-similarity of the free energy landscape of protein G. , 2006, Physical review letters.

[7]  G. Rose,et al.  A backbone-based theory of protein folding , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[8]  J. Echave,et al.  Evolutionary Conservation of Protein Backbone Flexibility , 2006, Journal of Molecular Evolution.

[9]  A. Konagurthu,et al.  MUSTANG: A multiple structural alignment algorithm , 2006, Proteins.

[10]  C. Micheletti,et al.  Convergent dynamics in the protease enzymatic superfamily. , 2006, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[11]  A. Murzin,et al.  Evolution of protein fold in the presence of functional constraints. , 2006, Current opinion in structural biology.

[12]  William R Taylor,et al.  Decoy models for protein structure comparison score normalisation. , 2006, Journal of molecular biology.

[13]  J. Thornton,et al.  Conformational diversity of ligands bound to proteins. , 2006, Journal of molecular biology.

[14]  Oliver F. Lange,et al.  Generalized correlation for biomolecular dynamics , 2005, Proteins.

[15]  Philip E. Bourne,et al.  Structural Evolution of the Protein Kinase–Like Superfamily , 2005, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[16]  M. Wall,et al.  Allostery in a coarse-grained model of protein dynamics. , 2005, Physical review letters.

[17]  M. Sternberg,et al.  The relationship between the flexibility of proteins and their conformational states on forming protein-protein complexes with an application to protein-protein docking. , 2005, Journal of molecular biology.

[18]  Giovanni Dietler,et al.  Functional dynamics of PDZ binding domains: a normal-mode analysis. , 2005, Biophysical journal.

[19]  Mark Gerstein,et al.  Normal modes for predicting protein motions: A comprehensive database assessment and associated Web tool , 2005, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[20]  Frances M. G. Pearl,et al.  The CATH Domain Structure Database and related resources Gene3D and DHS provide comprehensive domain family information for genome analysis , 2004, Nucleic Acids Res..

[21]  M. Kapoor,et al.  Structural basis for the variation in triclosan affinity to enoyl reductases. , 2004, Journal of molecular biology.

[22]  M. Chance,et al.  DNA Binding Provides a Molecular Strap Activating the Adenovirus Proteinase*S , 2004, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[23]  Ruth Nussinov,et al.  BioInfo3D: a suite of tools for structural bioinformatics , 2004, Nucleic Acids Res..

[24]  Ruth Nussinov,et al.  A method for simultaneous alignment of multiple protein structures , 2004, Proteins.

[25]  A. Maritan,et al.  Accurate and efficient description of protein vibrational dynamics: Comparing molecular dynamics and Gaussian models , 2004, Proteins.

[26]  W. Pearson,et al.  Sensitivity and selectivity in protein structure comparison , 2004, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[27]  L. Regan,et al.  Covariation of backbone motion throughout a small protein domain , 2003, Nature Structural Biology.

[28]  Gail J. Bartlett,et al.  Catalysing new reactions during evolution: economy of residues and mechanism. , 2003, Journal of molecular biology.

[29]  John D. Storey,et al.  Statistical significance for genomewide studies , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[30]  Rodrigo Lopez,et al.  Multiple sequence alignment with the Clustal series of programs , 2003, Nucleic Acids Res..

[31]  Charles L Brooks,et al.  Correlated motion and the effect of distal mutations in dihydrofolate reductase , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[32]  M. Delarue,et al.  Simplified normal mode analysis of conformational transitions in DNA-dependent polymerases: the elastic network model. , 2002, Journal of molecular biology.

[33]  Joseph J. Falke,et al.  A Moving Story , 2002, Science.

[34]  B. Halle,et al.  Flexibility and packing in proteins , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[35]  C. Ponting,et al.  On the evolution of protein folds: are similar motifs in different protein folds the result of convergence, insertion, or relics of an ancient peptide world? , 2001, Journal of structural biology.

[36]  M. Denton,et al.  Laws of form revisited , 2001, Nature.

[37]  K. Hinsen,et al.  Harmonicity in slow protein dynamics , 2000 .

[38]  D. Higgins,et al.  T-Coffee: A novel method for fast and accurate multiple sequence alignment. , 2000, Journal of molecular biology.

[39]  Liisa Holm,et al.  DaliLite workbench for protein structure comparison , 2000, Bioinform..

[40]  R. Jernigan,et al.  Proteins with similar architecture exhibit similar large-scale dynamic behavior. , 2000, Biophysical journal.

[41]  D W Rice,et al.  Inhibitor Binding Studies on Enoyl Reductase Reveal Conformational Changes Related to Substrate Recognition* , 1999, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[42]  A. Amadei,et al.  On the convergence of the conformational coordinates basis set obtained by the essential dynamics analysis of proteins' molecular dynamics simulations , 1999, Proteins.

[43]  George D. Rose,et al.  Identifying two ancient enzymes in Archaea using predicted secondary structure alignment , 1999, Nature Structural Biology.

[44]  K. Hinsen Analysis of domain motions by approximate normal mode calculations , 1998, Proteins.

[45]  M. Levitt,et al.  A unified statistical framework for sequence comparison and structure comparison. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[46]  T. A. Jones,et al.  High-resolution crystal structures reveal how a cellulose chain is bound in the 50 A long tunnel of cellobiohydrolase I from Trichoderma reesei. , 1998, Journal of molecular biology.

[47]  Thomas L. Madden,et al.  Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. , 1997, Nucleic acids research.

[48]  B. Tidor Molecular dynamics simulations , 1997, Current Biology.

[49]  A. Atilgan,et al.  Direct evaluation of thermal fluctuations in proteins using a single-parameter harmonic potential. , 1997, Folding & design.

[50]  Y. Lindqvist,et al.  Active site mutants of Escherichia coli dethiobiotin synthetase: effects of mutations on enzyme catalytic and structural properties. , 1997, Biochemistry.

[51]  Tirion,et al.  Large Amplitude Elastic Motions in Proteins from a Single-Parameter, Atomic Analysis. , 1996, Physical review letters.

[52]  C Sander,et al.  Mapping the Protein Universe , 1996, Science.

[53]  A M Lesk,et al.  Conservation and variability in the structures of serine proteinases of the chymotrypsin family. , 1996, Journal of molecular biology.

[54]  K Schulten,et al.  VMD: visual molecular dynamics. , 1996, Journal of molecular graphics.

[55]  Dusanka Janezic,et al.  Harmonic analysis of large systems. I. Methodology , 1995, J. Comput. Chem..

[56]  A G Murzin,et al.  SCOP: a structural classification of proteins database for the investigation of sequences and structures. , 1995, Journal of molecular biology.

[57]  John A. Tainer,et al.  Structure and function of the multifunctional DNA-repair enzyme exonuclease III , 1995, Nature.

[58]  C. Chothia One thousand families for the molecular biologist , 1992, Nature.

[59]  García,et al.  Large-amplitude nonlinear motions in proteins. , 1992, Physical review letters.

[60]  N Go,et al.  Projection of monte carlo and molecular dynamics trajectories onto the normal mode axes: Human lysozyme , 1991, Proteins.

[61]  M. Levitt,et al.  Protein normal-mode dynamics: trypsin inhibitor, crambin, ribonuclease and lysozyme. , 1985, Journal of molecular biology.

[62]  A. R. Srinivasan,et al.  Quasi‐harmonic method for studying very low frequency modes in proteins , 1984, Biopolymers.

[63]  Janet M. Thornton,et al.  The Catalytic Site Atlas: a resource of catalytic sites and residues identified in enzymes using structural data , 2004, Nucleic Acids Res..

[64]  J. Falke,et al.  Enzymology. A moving story. , 2002, Science.

[65]  R. Jernigan,et al.  Anisotropy of fluctuation dynamics of proteins with an elastic network model. , 2001, Biophysical journal.

[66]  Arthur M. Lesk,et al.  Introduction to Protein Science: Architecture, Function, and Genomics , 2001 .

[67]  M. Denton,et al.  Protein folds: laws of form revisited. , 2001, Nature.

[68]  V. Ingram The evolution of a protein. , 1962, Federation proceedings.