Exogenous attention enhances 2nd-order contrast sensitivity

Natural scenes contain a rich variety of contours that the visual system extracts to segregate the retinal image into perceptually coherent regions. Covert spatial attention helps extract contours by enhancing contrast sensitivity for 1st-order, luminance-defined patterns at attended locations, while reducing sensitivity at unattended locations, relative to neutral attention allocation. However, humans are also sensitive to 2nd-order patterns such as spatial variations of texture, which are predominant in natural scenes and cannot be detected by linear mechanisms. We assess whether and how exogenous attention--the involuntary and transient capture of spatial attention--affects the contrast sensitivity of channels sensitive to 2nd-order, texture-defined patterns. Using 2nd-order, texture-defined stimuli, we demonstrate that exogenous attention increases 2nd-order contrast sensitivity at the attended location, while decreasing it at unattended locations, relative to a neutral condition. By manipulating both 1st- and 2nd-order spatial frequency, we find that the effects of attention depend both on 2nd-order spatial frequency of the stimulus and the observer's 2nd-order spatial resolution at the target location. At parafoveal locations, attention enhances 2nd-order contrast sensitivity to high, but not to low 2nd-order spatial frequencies; at peripheral locations attention also enhances sensitivity to low 2nd-order spatial frequencies. Control experiments rule out the possibility that these effects might be due to an increase in contrast sensitivity at the 1st-order stage of visual processing. Thus, exogenous attention affects 2nd-order contrast sensitivity at both attended and unattended locations.

[1]  Peter Thier,et al.  Improvement of visual acuity by spatial cueing: a comparative study in human and non-human primates , 2004, Vision Research.

[2]  M. Carrasco,et al.  Attention Alters the Appearance of Spatial Frequency and Gap Size , 2005, Psychological science.

[3]  C. J. Downing Expectancy and visual-spatial attention: effects on perceptual quality. , 1988, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[4]  M. Carrasco,et al.  Attention alters appearance , 2004, Nature Neuroscience.

[5]  M. Carrasco,et al.  Transient Attention Enhances Perceptual Performance and fMRI Response in Human Visual Cortex , 2005, Neuron.

[6]  Curtis L. Baker,et al.  Ecologically valid combinations of first- and second-order surface markings facilitate texture discrimination , 2007, Vision Research.

[7]  R. Hess,et al.  Investigating local network interactions underlying first- and second-order processing , 2004, Vision Research.

[8]  R. Leigh,et al.  The neurology of eye movements , 2006 .

[9]  A. Schofield,et al.  The efficacy of local luminance amplitude in disambiguating the origin of luminance signals depends on carrier frequency: Further evidence for the active role of second-order vision in layer decomposition , 2011, Vision Research.

[10]  Vision Research , 1961, Nature.

[11]  M. Carrasco Covert attention increases contrast sensitivity: Psychophysical, neurophysiological and neuroimaging studies. , 2006, Progress in brain research.

[12]  Viola S. Störmer,et al.  Cross-modal cueing of attention alters appearance and early cortical processing of visual stimuli , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[13]  Marisa Carrasco,et al.  Covert attention effects on spatial resolution. , 2009, Progress in brain research.

[14]  J. Robson,et al.  Probability summation and regional variation in contrast sensitivity across the visual field , 1981, Vision Research.

[15]  Barbara Anne Dosher,et al.  Attention mechanisms for multi-location first- and second-order motion perception , 2000, Vision Research.

[16]  Burkhart Fischer,et al.  THE ROLE OF ATTENTION IN THE PREPARATION OF VISUALLY GUIDED SACCADIC EYE MOVEMENTS IN MAN , 1987 .

[17]  F. Kingdom,et al.  Modulation frequency and orientation tuning of second-order texture mechanisms. , 1999, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[18]  M. Posner,et al.  Orienting of Attention* , 1980, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[19]  Gunther W. Balz,et al.  The Effect of Attentional Spread on Spatial Resolution , 1997, Vision Research.

[20]  N. Graham,et al.  A note about preferred orientations at the first and second stages of complex (second-order) texture channels. , 2001, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[21]  M. Carrasco,et al.  Exogenous attention and color perception: Performance and appearance of saturation and hue , 2006, Vision Research.

[22]  Marisa Carrasco,et al.  When sustained attention impairs perception , 2006, Nature Neuroscience.

[23]  Mark M Schira,et al.  Differential contribution of early visual areas to the perceptual process of contour processing. , 2004, Journal of neurophysiology.

[24]  D. Heeger,et al.  Task-related modulation of visual cortex. , 2000, Journal of neurophysiology.

[25]  S Baldassi,et al.  Are there separate first-order and second-order mechanisms for orientation discrimination? , 2000, Vision Research.

[26]  M. Georgeson,et al.  Sensitivity to modulations of luminance and contrast in visual white noise: separate mechanisms with similar behaviour , 1999, Vision Research.

[27]  J. Findlay,et al.  The effect of visual attention on peripheral discrimination thresholds in single and multiple element displays. , 1988, Acta psychologica.

[28]  Marisa Carrasco,et al.  The effects of transient attention on spatial resolution and the size of the attentional cue , 2008, Perception & psychophysics.

[29]  B. Julesz Textons, the elements of texture perception, and their interactions , 1981, Nature.

[30]  L. Chalupa,et al.  The visual neurosciences , 2004 .

[31]  J. Reynolds,et al.  Attentional modulation of visual processing. , 2004, Annual review of neuroscience.

[32]  Michael S. Landy,et al.  Computational models of visual processing , 1991 .

[33]  David E. Irwin,et al.  Capturing attention , 1981, Cognition.

[34]  S. Yantis,et al.  Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention: evidence from visual search. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[35]  C. Baker,et al.  First- and second-order information in natural images: a filter-based approach to image statistics. , 2004, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[36]  Paul Azzopardi,et al.  Uneven mapping of magnocellular and parvocellular projections from the lateral geniculate nucleus to the striate cortex in the macaque monkey , 1999, Vision Research.

[37]  Jared Abrams,et al.  Voluntary attention increases perceived spatial frequency , 2010, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[38]  J. Rovamo,et al.  Cortical magnification factor predicts the photopic contrast sensitivity of peripheral vision , 1978, Nature.

[39]  M. Carrasco,et al.  On the flexibility of sustained attention and its effects on a texture segmentation task , 2008, Vision Research.

[40]  R. Desimone,et al.  Selective attention gates visual processing in the extrastriate cortex. , 1985, Science.

[41]  D. Heeger,et al.  Spatial attention affects brain activity in human primary visual cortex. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[42]  N. Graham,et al.  Investigating simple and complex mechanisms in texture segregation using the speed-accuracy tradeoff method , 1995, Vision Research.

[43]  J. C. Johnston,et al.  Involuntary attentional capture by abrupt onsets , 1992, Perception & psychophysics.

[44]  R. Hess,et al.  The interaction of first- and second-order cues to orientation , 1999, Vision Research.

[45]  Steven A. Hillyard,et al.  Effects of spatial cuing on luminance detectability: Psychophysical and electrophysiological evidence for early selection. , 1994 .

[46]  J. Bergen,et al.  Texture segregation and orientation gradient , 1991, Vision Research.

[47]  E. Adelson,et al.  Early vision and texture perception , 1988, Nature.

[48]  M. Georgeson,et al.  Does early non-linearity account for second-order motion? , 1999, Vision Research.

[49]  M. Carrasco,et al.  How do attention and adaptation affect contrast sensitivity? , 2007, Journal of vision.

[50]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  Texture segregation in the human visual cortex: A functional MRI study. , 2000, Journal of neurophysiology.

[51]  M. Carrasco,et al.  Spatial covert attention increases contrast sensitivity across the CSF: support for signal enhancement , 2000, Vision Research.

[52]  M. Carrasco,et al.  Attention trades off spatial acuity , 2009, Vision Research.

[53]  M. Carrasco,et al.  Sustained and transient covert attention enhance the signal via different contrast response functions , 2006, Vision Research.

[54]  R A Kinchla,et al.  Precue effects in visual search: Data or resource limited? , 1995, Perception & psychophysics.

[55]  P Perona,et al.  Preattentive texture discrimination with early vision mechanisms. , 1990, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[56]  M. Cheal,et al.  Central and Peripheral Precuing of Forced-Choice Discrimination , 1991, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[57]  M. Carrasco,et al.  Evaluating comparative and equality judgments in contrast perception: attention alters appearance. , 2010, Journal of vision.

[58]  M. Carrasco,et al.  On the automaticity and flexibility of covert attention: a speed-accuracy trade-off analysis. , 2009, Journal of vision.

[59]  Marisa Carrasco,et al.  Attention improves or impairs visual performance by enhancing spatial resolution , 1998, Nature.

[60]  C Meinecke,et al.  Automaticity and attention: investigating automatic processing in texture segmentation with event-related brain potentials. , 2001, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[61]  Josée Rivest,et al.  Localizing contours defined by more than one attribute , 1996, Vision Research.

[62]  P. Lennie The Cost of Cortical Computation , 2003, Current Biology.

[63]  E. DeYoe,et al.  A physiological correlate of the 'spotlight' of visual attention , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.

[64]  B. Dosher,et al.  Mechanisms of perceptual attention in precuing of location , 2000, Vision Research.

[65]  H. Nothdurft Orientation sensitivity and texture segmentation in patterns with different line orientation , 1985, Vision Research.

[66]  Gianluca Campana,et al.  Attention modulates psychophysical and electrophysiological response to visual texture segmentation in humans , 2005, Vision Research.

[67]  H. J. Muller,et al.  Reflexive and voluntary orienting of visual attention: time course of activation and resistance to interruption. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[68]  A J Schofield,et al.  What Does Second-Order Vision See in an Image? , 2000, Perception.

[69]  M. Carrasco,et al.  Feature asymmetries in visual search: Effects of display duration, target eccentricity, orientation and spatial frequency , 1998, Vision Research.

[70]  D. Sagi,et al.  Vision outside the focus of attention , 1990, Perception & psychophysics.

[71]  Stefan Treue,et al.  Attention changes perceived size of moving visual patterns. , 2007, Journal of vision.

[72]  M. Carrasco,et al.  Attention enhances contrast sensitivity at cued and impairs it at uncued locations , 2005, Vision Research.

[73]  M. Carrasco,et al.  Vertical meridian asymmetry in spatial resolution: Visual and attentional factors , 2002, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[74]  D. Spinelli,et al.  Different attentional resources modulate the gain mechanisms for color and luminance contrast , 2004, Vision Research.

[75]  N E Scott-Samuel,et al.  First-order and second-order signals combine to improve perceptual accuracy. , 2001, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[76]  Alex R. Wade,et al.  Figure-ground interaction in the human visual cortex. , 2008, Journal of vision.

[77]  R. Leigh,et al.  The neurology of eye movements , 1984 .

[78]  R. Reid,et al.  Attention Modulates the Responses of Simple Cells in Monkey Primary Visual Cortex , 2005, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[79]  B McElree,et al.  Covert attention accelerates the rate of visual information processing , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[80]  B. Dosher,et al.  External noise distinguishes attention mechanisms , 1998, Vision Research.

[81]  Peng Sun,et al.  What is second-order vision for? Discriminating illumination versus material changes. , 2010, Journal of vision.

[82]  C. Baker Central neural mechanisms for detecting second-order motion , 1999, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[83]  S. Yantis,et al.  Uniqueness of abrupt visual onset in capturing attention , 1988, Perception & psychophysics.

[84]  Marisa Carrasco,et al.  Attention speeds processing across eccentricity: Feature and conjunction searches , 2006, Vision Research.

[85]  L. Kehrer Central performance drop on perceptual segregation tasks. , 1989, Spatial vision.

[86]  Michael S. Landy,et al.  Complex Channels, Early Local Nonlinearities, and Normalization in Texture Segregation , 1991 .

[87]  Frederick A A Kingdom,et al.  Spatiochromatic statistics of natural scenes: first- and second-order information and their correlational structure. , 2005, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[88]  Yaffa Yeshurun,et al.  Covert attention increases spatial resolution with or without masks: support for signal enhancement. , 2002, Journal of vision.

[89]  N. Graham Visual Pattern Analyzers , 1989 .

[90]  Harriet A. Allen,et al.  Second-order spatial frequency and orientation channels in human vision , 2006, Vision Research.

[91]  Norma Graham,et al.  Nonlinear processes in spatial-frequency channel models of perceived texture segregation: Effects of sign and amount of contrast , 1992, Vision Research.

[92]  K. Dobkins,et al.  Attentional effects on contrast discrimination in humans: evidence for both contrast gain and response gain , 2004, Vision Research.

[93]  J. Robson,et al.  Grating summation in fovea and periphery , 1978, Vision Research.

[94]  M. Landy,et al.  Properties of second-order spatial frequency channels , 2002, Vision Research.

[95]  Cristina Meinecke,et al.  Automatic texture segmentation in early vision: Evidence from priming experiments , 2007, Vision Research.

[96]  M. Landy,et al.  Orientation-selective adaptation to first- and second-order patterns in human visual cortex. , 2006, Journal of neurophysiology.

[97]  M. Carrasco,et al.  Covert attention affects the psychometric function of contrast sensitivity , 2002, Vision Research.

[98]  Frederick A A Kingdom,et al.  Color brings relief to human vision , 2003, Nature Neuroscience.

[99]  Y. Yeshurun Isoluminant stimuli and red background attenuate the effects of transient spatial attention on temporal resolution , 2004, Vision Research.

[100]  M. Carrasco,et al.  A population-coding model of attention’s influence on contrast response: Estimating neural effects from psychophysical data , 2009, Vision Research.

[101]  Anthony M Norcia,et al.  Attentive and pre-attentive aspects of figural processing. , 2009, Journal of vision.

[102]  C. Baker,et al.  Processing of second-order stimuli in the visual cortex. , 2001, Progress in brain research.

[103]  L. Zhaoping,et al.  V1 mechanisms and some figure–ground and border effects , 2003, Journal of Physiology-Paris.

[104]  R. Hess,et al.  On the decline of 1st and 2nd order sensitivity with eccentricity. , 2008, Journal of vision.

[105]  Harriet A. Allen,et al.  Attentional modulation of threshold sensitivity to first-order motion and second-order motion patterns , 2003, Vision Research.

[106]  Michael S. Landy,et al.  Visual perception of texture , 2002 .

[107]  K. Nakayama,et al.  Sustained and transient components of focal visual attention , 1989, Vision Research.

[108]  J. Beck,et al.  Contrast and spatial variables in texture segregation: Testing a simple spatial-frequency channels model , 1989, Perception & psychophysics.

[109]  Yun-Xian Ho,et al.  How Attention Enhances Spatial Resolution: Evidence from Selective Adaptation to Spatial Frequency P343 Cv Jp Dj , 2022 .

[110]  F. Kingdom,et al.  Sensitivity to orientation modulation in micropattern-based textures , 1995, Vision Research.

[111]  T. Womelsdorf,et al.  Dynamic shifts of visual receptive fields in cortical area MT by spatial attention , 2006, Nature Neuroscience.

[112]  D. Heeger,et al.  When size matters: attention affects performance by contrast or response gain , 2010, Nature Neuroscience.

[113]  Stefan Treue,et al.  Attention Reshapes Center-Surround Receptive Field Structure in Macaque Cortical Area MT , 2009, Cerebral cortex.

[114]  Zhaoping Li V1 mechanisms and some figure-ground and border effects. , 2003, Journal of physiology, Paris.

[115]  P. O. Bishop,et al.  Spatial vision. , 1971, Annual review of psychology.

[116]  Marisa Carrasco,et al.  Temporal performance fields: visual and attentional factors , 2004, Vision Research.

[117]  Mark A. Georgeson,et al.  Local luminance amplitude modulates the interpretation of shape-from-shading in textured surfaces , 2006, Vision Research.

[118]  D. Heeger,et al.  The Normalization Model of Attention , 2009, Neuron.

[119]  R. Desimone,et al.  The Role of Neural Mechanisms of Attention in Solving the Binding Problem , 1999, Neuron.

[120]  Frederick A. A. Kingdom,et al.  PII: S0042-6989(98)00217-X , 1998 .

[121]  M. Carrasco,et al.  The locus of attentional effects in texture segmentation , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[122]  Sean T. Stevens,et al.  Comparing the time course and efficacy of spatial and feature-based attention , 2007, Vision Research.

[123]  Kazunori Morikawa,et al.  Central performance drop in texture segmentation: the role of spatial and temporal factors , 2000, Vision Research.

[124]  Zhong-Lin Lu,et al.  Spatial attention excludes external noise without changing the spatial frequency tuning of the perceptual template. , 2004, Journal of vision.

[125]  M S Landy,et al.  Ideal cue combination for localizing texture-defined edges. , 2001, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.