Matrix Lie Maps and Neural Networks for Solving Differential Equations

The coincidence between polynomial neural networks and matrix Lie maps is discussed in the article. The matrix form of Lie transform is an approximation of the general solution of the nonlinear system of ordinary differential equations. It can be used for solving systems of differential equations more efficiently than traditional step-by-step numerical methods. Implementation of the Lie map as a polynomial neural network provides a tool for both simulation and data-driven identification of dynamical systems. If the differential equation is provided, training a neural network is unnecessary. The weights of the network can be directly calculated from the equation. On the other hand, for data-driven system learning, the weights can be fitted without any assumptions in view of differential equations. The proposed technique is discussed in the examples of both ordinary and partial differential equations. The building of a polynomial neural network that simulates the Van der Pol oscillator is discussed. For this example, we consider learning the dynamics from a single solution of the system. We also demonstrate the building of the neural network that describes the solution of Burgers' equation that is a fundamental partial differential equation.

[1]  Chin-Teng Lin,et al.  Runge-Kutta neural network for identification of dynamical systems in high accuracy , 1998, IEEE Trans. Neural Networks.

[2]  L. Zjavka Differential Polynomial Neural Network , 2011 .

[3]  F. Casas Solution of linear partial differential equations by Lie algebraic methods , 1996 .

[4]  David Duvenaud,et al.  Neural Ordinary Differential Equations , 2018, NeurIPS.

[5]  Angelos A. Anastassi Constructing Runge–Kutta methods with the use of artificial neural networks , 2013, Neural Computing and Applications.

[6]  A. Ivanov,et al.  Spin Tune Parametric Resonance Investigation , 2014 .

[7]  Mohsen Hayati,et al.  Feedforward Neural Network for Solving Partial Differential Equations , 2007 .

[8]  Serge N. Andrianov A Role of Symbolic Computations in Beam Physics , 2010, CASC.

[9]  Justin A. Sirignano,et al.  DGM: A deep learning algorithm for solving partial differential equations , 2017, J. Comput. Phys..

[10]  A. Dragt,et al.  Lie methods for nonlinear dynamics with applications to accelerator physics , 2011 .

[11]  G. M.,et al.  Partial Differential Equations I , 2023, Applied Mathematical Sciences.

[12]  Karthik Duraisamy,et al.  Long-time predictive modeling of nonlinear dynamical systems using neural networks , 2018, Complex..

[13]  THE CONVERGENCE AND ACCURACY OF THE MATRIX FORMALISM APPROXIMATION , 2012 .

[14]  E Weinan,et al.  Deep Learning-Based Numerical Methods for High-Dimensional Parabolic Partial Differential Equations and Backward Stochastic Differential Equations , 2017, Communications in Mathematics and Statistics.

[15]  Dimitrios I. Fotiadis,et al.  Artificial neural networks for solving ordinary and partial differential equations , 1997, IEEE Trans. Neural Networks.

[16]  Muzhou Hou,et al.  A novel improved extreme learning machine algorithm in solving ordinary differential equations by Legendre neural network methods , 2018, Advances in Difference Equations.

[17]  Francesco Oliveri,et al.  Lie symmetries of differential equations:direct and inverse problems , 2004 .

[18]  S. Effati,et al.  Artificial Neural Networks Approach for Solving Stokes Problem , 2010 .