Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin Koole Et Al. / on the Social Nature of Personality on the Social Nature of Personality: Effects of Extraversion, Agreeableness, and Feedback about Collective Resource Use on Cooperation in a Resource Dilemma

The present research investigated how individual differences in Extraversion and Agreeableness affect cooperation in an experimental resource dilemma. Manipulated feedback indicated either that the common resource was being used at a sustainable rate or that it was being rapidly depleted. As predicted, Extraversion was generally negatively related to cooperation, whereas Agreeableness was generally positively related to cooperation. Whereas individuals high in Extraversion and individuals low in Agreeableness were unresponsive to feedback regarding collective resource use, individuals low in Extraversion and individuals high in Agreeableness exercised more self-restraint when the common resource was severely threatened. Exploratory analyses revealed neither interactive effects of Extraversion and Agreeableness nor effects of individual differences in Conscientiousness, Emotional Stability, and Intellect. Together, these results highlight the importance of individual differences in Extraversion and Agreeableness in social dilemma settings.

[1]  J. S. Wiggins,et al.  Extension of the Interpersonal Adjective Scales to include the Big Five dimensions of personality. , 1990 .

[2]  D. Buss,et al.  Evolutionary foundations of personality. , 1997 .

[3]  H. Simon,et al.  A mechanism for social selection and successful altruism. , 1990, Science.

[4]  D. McAdams,et al.  The five-factor model in personality: a critical appraisal. , 1992, Journal of personality.

[5]  Jeffrey Pfeffer,et al.  Just a Mirage: The Search for Dispositional Effects in Organizational Research , 1989 .

[6]  R. Friedman,et al.  Bargainer Characteristics in Distributive and Integrative Negotiation , 1998 .

[7]  J. Block A contrarian view of the five-factor approach to personality description. , 1995, Psychological bulletin.

[8]  R Hogan,et al.  A socioanalytic theory of personality. , 1983, Nebraska Symposium on Motivation. Nebraska Symposium on Motivation.

[9]  D. Buss Selection, evocation, and manipulation. , 1987, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[10]  William G. Graziano,et al.  Extraversion, social cognition, and the salience of aversiveness in social encounters. , 1985 .

[11]  Roderick M. Kramer,et al.  Choice behavior in social dilemmas: Effects of social identity, group size, and decision framing. , 1986 .

[12]  Wim B. G. Liebrand,et al.  The effects of social motives on behavior in social dilemmas in two cultures. , 1985 .

[13]  Steven L. Neuberg,et al.  Behavioral Implications of Information Presented Outside of Conscious Awareness: The Effect of Subliminal Presentation of Trait Information on Behavior in the Prisoner's Dilemma Game , 1988 .

[14]  J. Suls,et al.  Coping efforts in daily life: role of big five traits and problem appraisals. , 1999, Journal of personality.

[15]  C. Rusbult,et al.  Development of prosocial, individualistic, and competitive orientations: theory and preliminary evidence. , 1997, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[16]  J. Finch,et al.  Competitiveness mediates the link between personality and group performance. , 1997, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[17]  Wim B. G. Liebrand,et al.  The effect of social motives, communication and group size on behaviour in an N-person multi-stage mixed-motive game , 1984 .

[18]  Daryl J. Bem,et al.  Template matching: A proposal for probing the ecological validity of experimental settings in social psychology. , 1979 .

[19]  K. Fiedler,et al.  Fair and dependent versus egoistic and free: effects of semantic and evaluative priming on the ‘Ring Measure of Social Values’ , 1998 .

[20]  Peter Borkenau,et al.  Traits as ideal-based and goal-derived social categories , 1990 .

[21]  M. Brewer On the social origins of human nature. , 1997 .

[22]  E. Diener,et al.  Situation selection as a moderator of response consistency and stability. , 1986 .

[23]  O. John,et al.  Determinants of interjudge agreement on personality traits: the big five domains, observability, evaluativeness, and the unique perspective of the self. , 1993, Journal of personality.

[24]  Hans J. Eysenck,et al.  Four ways five factors are not basic , 1992 .

[25]  J. M. Digman PERSONALITY STRUCTURE: EMERGENCE OF THE FIVE-FACTOR MODEL , 1990 .

[26]  H. Eysenck Biological Basis of Personality , 1963, Nature.

[27]  Anthony S. Bryk,et al.  Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods , 1992 .

[28]  W. Hofstee,et al.  Who should own the definition of personality? , 1994 .

[29]  Tom A. B. Snijders,et al.  Analysis of longitudinal data using the hierarchical linear model , 1996 .

[30]  D. Funder,et al.  Congruence of others' and self-judgments of personality. , 1997 .

[31]  G. Semin,et al.  The relationship between higher order models and everyday conceptions of personality , 1985 .

[32]  D. Buss,et al.  Manipulation in close relationships: five personality factors in interactional context. , 1992, Journal of personality.

[33]  J. Gray Chapter 12 – The Psychophysiological Nature of Introversion—Extraversion: A Modification of Eysenck's Theory , 1972 .

[34]  Graham F. Wagstaff,et al.  Personality assessment , 1980, Nature.

[35]  J. Burger,et al.  Personality and Social Influence Strategies in the Workplace , 1997 .

[36]  P. Costa,et al.  The structure of interpersonal traits: Wiggins's circumplex and the five-factor model. , 1989, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[37]  J. Rubin,et al.  Negotiation , 1983 .

[38]  P. Costa,et al.  Validation of the five-factor model of personality across instruments and observers. , 1987, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[39]  S. Komorita,et al.  Interpersonal Relations: Mixed-Motive Interaction , 1995 .

[40]  D. Ra'ad,et al.  The psycholexical approach to the structure of interpersonal traits , 1995 .

[41]  D. McAdams What Do We Know When We Know a Person , 1995 .

[42]  D. Funder On the accuracy of personality judgment: a realistic approach. , 1995, Psychological review.

[43]  Roger Lewin,et al.  People of the Lake: Mankind and Its Beginnings , 1978 .

[44]  Wim B. G. Liebrand,et al.  Role of interdependence structure, individual value orientation, and another's strategy in social decision making: a transformational analysis , 1988 .

[45]  D. Messick,et al.  Motivational bases of choice in experimental games , 1968 .

[46]  J. S. Wiggins,et al.  A psychological taxonomy of trait-descriptive terms: The interpersonal domain. , 1979 .

[47]  L Cosmides,et al.  On the universality of human nature and the uniqueness of the individual: the role of genetics and adaptation. , 1990, Journal of personality.

[48]  R. Norman,et al.  Extraversion and reactions to cognitive inconsistency. , 1976 .

[49]  L. Thompson Negotiation behavior and outcomes: Empirical evidence and theoretical issues. , 1990 .

[50]  Fritz Ostendorf,et al.  The lexical approach to personality: A historical review of trait taxonomic research , 1988 .

[51]  J. Suls,et al.  Person-Environment Fit and its Limits: Agreeableness, Neuroticism, and Emotional Reactivity to Interpersonal Conflict , 1998 .

[52]  T. Leary,et al.  The interpersonal dimension of personality. , 1951, Journal of personality.

[53]  Wyer,et al.  Prediction of behavior in two-person games , 1969 .

[54]  R. McCrae,et al.  An introduction to the five-factor model and its applications. , 1992, Journal of personality.

[55]  L. R. Goldberg,et al.  Integration of the big five and circumplex approaches to trait structure. , 1992, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[56]  W. Graziano,et al.  Perceiving interpersonal conflict and reacting to it: the case for agreeableness. , 1996, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[57]  John A. Bargh,et al.  Auto-motives: Preconscious determinants of social interaction. , 1990 .

[58]  J. M. Digman,et al.  Factors In The Natural Language Of Personality: Re-Analysis, Comparison, And Interpretation Of Six Major Studies. , 1981, Multivariate behavioral research.

[59]  David M. Messick,et al.  Social values and cooperative response to a simulated resource conservation crisis , 1986 .

[60]  N. Eisenberg,et al.  Agreeableness: A Dimension of Personality , 1997 .

[61]  C. Nemeth,et al.  A Critical Analysis of Research Utilizing the Prisoner's Dilemma Paradigm for the Study of Bargaining , 1972 .

[62]  C. Parks,et al.  The Predictive Ability of Social Values in Resource Dilemmas and Public Goods Games , 1994 .

[63]  Paul A. M. Van Lange,et al.  Social Value Orientations and Impressions of Partner's Honesty and Intelligence: A Test of the Might Versus Morality Effect , 1994 .

[64]  G. Hardin,et al.  The Tragedy of the Commons , 1968, Green Planet Blues.

[65]  D. M. Kuhlman,et al.  Individual differences in game motivation as moderators of preprogrammed strategy effects in prisoner's dilemma. , 1975, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[66]  H. Kelley,et al.  Social interaction basis of cooperators' and competitors' beliefs about others. , 1970 .

[67]  Peter J. Carnevale,et al.  Framing in Resource Dilemmas: Loss Aversion and the Moderating Effects of Sanctions , 1995 .

[68]  D. Buss Conflict in married couples: personality predictors of anger and upset. , 1991, Journal of personality.

[69]  S. Alexander Haslam,et al.  The message of social psychology: Perspectives on mind in society. , 1997 .

[70]  Debbie S. Moskowitz,et al.  Convergence of self-reports and independent observers : dominance and friendliness , 1990 .

[71]  L. Wheeler,et al.  Review of personality and social psychology , 1980 .