Dense connectomic reconstruction in layer 4 of the somatosensory cortex

Brain anatomy revealed in startling detail The mammalian cerebral cortex is an enormously complex network of neuronal processes that are long and thin, branching, and extremely densely packed. This high packing density has made the reconstruction of cortical neuronal networks challenging. Motta et al. used advanced automated imaging and analysis tools to reconstruct with high spatial resolution the morphological features of 89 neurons and their connections in the mouse barrel cortex. The reconstruction covered an area more than two orders of magnitude larger than earlier neuroanatomical mapping attempts. This approach revealed information about the connectivity of inhibitory and excitatory synapses of corticocortical as well as excitatory thalamocortical connections. Science, this issue p. eaay3134 An advanced, automated imaging and analysis tool reconstructs high-resolution morphological features of 89 neurons and their connections. INTRODUCTION The brain of mammals consists of an enormously dense network of neuronal wires: the axons and dendrites of nerve cells. Their packing density is so high that light-based imaging methods have so far only been able to resolve a very small fraction of nerve cells and their interaction sites, the synapses, in mammalian cortex. Recent advances in three-dimensional (3D) electron microscopy allow researchers to image every nerve cell and all chemical synapses in a given piece of brain tissue, opening up the possibility of mapping neuronal networks densely, not just sparsely. Although there have been substantial advances in imaging speed, the analysis of such 3D image data is still the limiting step. Therefore, dense reconstructions of cortical tissue have thus far been limited to femtoliter-scale volumes, keeping the systematic analysis of axons, neuronal cell bodies and their dendrites of different types, and the dense connectome between them out of reach. RATIONALE Image analysis has made decisive progress using artificial intelligence–based methods, but the resulting reconstructions of dense nerve tissue are still too error-prone to be scientifically meaningful as is. To address this, human data analysis has been integrated into the generation of connectomes and it is the efficiency of this human–machine data analysis that now determines progress in connectomics. We therefore focused on efficiency gains by: (i) improving the automated segmentation quality, (ii) analyzing the automated segmentation for locations of likely errors and directing the human work to these locations only, and (iii) optimizing human data interaction by helping annotators to immediately understand the problem to be solved, allowing fast, in-browser parallel data flight, and by minimizing latency between annotator queries. With this, close to 100 student annotators solved hundreds of thousands of reconstruction problems within just 29 s each, including all preparation and transition time. RESULTS We reconstructed 2.7 m of neuronal wires densely in layer 4 of mouse somatosensory cortex within only ~4000 invested human work hours, yielding a reconstruction ~300 times larger than previous dense cortical reconstructions at ~20-fold increased efficiency, a leap for the dense reconstruction of connectomes. The resulting connectome between 6979 presynaptic and 3719 postsynaptic neurites with at least 10 synapses each, comprising 153,171 synapses total, was then analyzed for the dense circuit structure in the cerebral cortex. We found that connectomic data alone allowed the definition of inhibitory axon types that showed established principles of synaptic specificity for subcellular postsynaptic compartments, but that at scales beyond ~5 μm, geometric predictability of the circuit structure was low and coarser models of random wiring needed to be rejected for dense cortical neuropil. A gradient of thalamocortical synapse density along the cortical axis yielded an enhanced variability of synaptic input composition at the level of single L4 cell dendrites. Finally, we quantified connectomic imprints consistent with Hebbian synaptic weight adaptation, obtaining upper bounds for the fraction of the circuit that could have undergone long-term potentiation. CONCLUSION By leveraging human–machine interaction for connectomic analysis of neuronal tissue, we acquired the largest connectome from the cerebral cortex to date. Using these data for connectomic cell-type definition and the mapping of upper bounds for the learned circuit fraction, we establish an approach for connectomic phenotyping of local dense neuronal circuitry in the mammalian cortex, opening the possibility for the connectomic screening of nervous tissue from various cortices, layers, species, developmental stages, sensory experience, and disease conditions. Dense reconstruction of ~500,000 cubic micrometers of cortical tissue yielding 2.7 m of neuronal cables (~3% shown, front) implementing a connectome of ~400,000 synapses between 34,221 axons and 11,400 postsynaptic processes (fraction shown, back). These data were used for connectomic cell-type definition, geometrical circuit analysis, and measurement of the possible plastic fraction (the “learnedness”) of the circuit. The dense circuit structure of mammalian cerebral cortex is still unknown. With developments in three-dimensional electron microscopy, the imaging of sizable volumes of neuropil has become possible, but dense reconstruction of connectomes is the limiting step. We reconstructed a volume of ~500,000 cubic micrometers from layer 4 of mouse barrel cortex, ~300 times larger than previous dense reconstructions from the mammalian cerebral cortex. The connectomic data allowed the extraction of inhibitory and excitatory neuron subtypes that were not predictable from geometric information. We quantified connectomic imprints consistent with Hebbian synaptic weight adaptation, which yielded upper bounds for the fraction of the circuit consistent with saturated long-term potentiation. These data establish an approach for the locally dense connectomic phenotyping of neuronal circuitry in the mammalian cortex.

[1]  M. Helmstaedter,et al.  Large-volume en-bloc staining for electron microscopy-based connectomics , 2015, Nature Communications.

[2]  G. Shepherd,et al.  Geometric and functional organization of cortical circuits , 2005, Nature Neuroscience.

[3]  J. Lübke,et al.  Columnar Organization of Dendrites and Axons of Single and Synaptically Coupled Excitatory Spiny Neurons in Layer 4 of the Rat Barrel Cortex , 2000, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[4]  Larry Lindsey,et al.  High-precision automated reconstruction of neurons with flood-filling networks , 2017, Nature Methods.

[5]  Prof. Dr. Dr. Valentino Braitenberg,et al.  Cortex: Statistics and Geometry of Neuronal Connectivity , 1998, Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

[6]  T. Sejnowski,et al.  Nanoconnectomic upper bound on the variability of synaptic plasticity , 2015, eLife.

[7]  R. Douglas,et al.  A Quantitative Map of the Circuit of Cat Primary Visual Cortex , 2004, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[8]  Pascal Fua,et al.  The effects of aging on neuropil structure in mouse somatosensory cortex—A 3D electron microscopy analysis of layer 1 , 2018, PloS one.

[9]  Michael C. Crair,et al.  A critical period for long-term potentiation at thalamocortical synapses , 1995, Nature.

[10]  Christel Genoud,et al.  3-dimensional electron microscopic imaging of the zebrafish olfactory bulb and dense reconstruction of neurons , 2016, Scientific Data.

[11]  Jackie Schiller,et al.  Nonlinear dendritic processing determines angular tuning of barrel cortex neurons in vivo , 2012, Nature.

[12]  Michael C. Crair,et al.  Laminar and Columnar Development of Barrel Cortex Relies on Thalamocortical Neurotransmission , 2013, Neuron.

[13]  Arthur W. Wetzel,et al.  Network anatomy and in vivo physiology of visual cortical neurons , 2011, Nature.

[14]  A. Peters Thalamic input to the cerebral cortex , 1979, Trends in Neurosciences.

[15]  Nuno Maçarico da Costa,et al.  Selective Targeting of the Dendrites of Corticothalamic Cells by Thalamic Afferents in Area 17 of the Cat , 2009, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[16]  Bert Sakmann,et al.  Monosynaptic Connections between Pairs of Spiny Stellate Cells in Layer 4 and Pyramidal Cells in Layer 5A Indicate That Lemniscal and Paralemniscal Afferent Pathways Converge in the Infragranular Somatosensory Cortex , 2005, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[17]  Yasuo Kawaguchi,et al.  Dendritic branch typing and spine expression patterns in cortical nonpyramidal cells. , 2006, Cerebral cortex.

[18]  John D. Storey,et al.  Statistical significance for genomewide studies , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[19]  M. Häusser,et al.  Dendritic Discrimination of Temporal Input Sequences in Cortical Neurons , 2010, Science.

[20]  B. Sakmann,et al.  Coincidence detection and changes of synaptic efficacy in spiny stellate neurons in rat barrel cortex , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.

[21]  Kevin L. Briggman,et al.  Wiring specificity in the direction-selectivity circuit of the retina , 2011, Nature.

[22]  T. Wiesel,et al.  Patterns of synaptic input to layer 4 of cat striate cortex , 1984, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[23]  Feng Li,et al.  The complete connectome of a learning and memory centre in an insect brain , 2017, Nature.

[24]  J. C. Anderson,et al.  Polyneuronal innervation of spiny stellate neurons in cat visual cortex , 1994, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[25]  K. Harris,et al.  Ultrastructural Analysis of Hippocampal Neuropil from the Connectomics Perspective , 2010, Neuron.

[26]  Roddy MacLeod,et al.  Coarse Filters for Shape Matching , 2002, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications.

[27]  Winfried Denk,et al.  EM connectomics reveals axonal target variation in a sequence-generating network , 2017, eLife.

[28]  Hongbin Zha,et al.  Thickness histogram and statistical harmonic representation for 3D model retrieval , 2004 .

[29]  E. Fifková,et al.  Long-lasting morphological changes in dendritic spines of dentate granular cells following stimulation of the entorhinal area , 1977, Journal of neurocytology.

[30]  J. Schiller,et al.  Active properties of neocortical pyramidal neuron dendrites. , 2013, Annual review of neuroscience.

[31]  Bert Sakmann,et al.  Linear integration of spine Ca2+ signals in layer 4 cortical neurons in vivo , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[32]  J. Lübke,et al.  Reliable synaptic connections between pairs of excitatory layer 4 neurones within a single ‘barrel’ of developing rat somatosensory cortex , 1999, The Journal of physiology.

[33]  Mark S. Cembrowski,et al.  Single excitatory axons form clustered synapses onto CA1 pyramidal cell dendrites , 2018, Nature Neuroscience.

[34]  M. Helmstaedter,et al.  Axonal synapse sorting in medial entorhinal cortex , 2017, Nature.

[35]  James G. King,et al.  An algorithm to predict the connectome of neural microcircuits , 2015, Front. Comput. Neurosci..

[36]  Srinivas C. Turaga,et al.  Space-time wiring specificity supports direction selectivity in the retina , 2014, Nature.

[37]  Patrick van der Smagt,et al.  SynEM, automated synapse detection for connectomics , 2017, eLife.

[38]  M. J. Friedlander,et al.  Plasticity between Neuronal Pairs in Layer 4 of Visual Cortex Varies with Synapse State , 2009, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[39]  Nir Shavit,et al.  Morphological Error Detection in 3D Segmentations , 2017, ArXiv.

[40]  J. Lübke,et al.  Morphometric analysis of the columnar innervation domain of neurons connecting layer 4 and layer 2/3 of juvenile rat barrel cortex. , 2003, Cerebral cortex.

[41]  E. White,et al.  Thalamocortical and other synapses involving nonspiny multipolar cells of mouse SmI cortex , 1984, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[42]  Marcel Oberlaender,et al.  Sensory Experience Restructures Thalamocortical Axons during Adulthood , 2012, Neuron.

[43]  J. Friedman Special Invited Paper-Additive logistic regression: A statistical view of boosting , 2000 .

[44]  Kevan A C Martin,et al.  An Ultrastructural Study of the Thalamic Input to Layer 4 of Primary Motor and Primary Somatosensory Cortex in the Mouse , 2017, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[45]  G. Ellis‐Davies,et al.  Structural basis of long-term potentiation in single dendritic spines , 2004, Nature.

[46]  William R. Gray Roncal,et al.  Saturated Reconstruction of a Volume of Neocortex , 2015, Cell.

[47]  Claire E. J. Cheetham,et al.  Pansynaptic Enlargement at Adult Cortical Connections Strengthened by Experience , 2012, Cerebral cortex.

[48]  H. S. Meyer,et al.  Number and Laminar Distribution of Neurons in a Thalamocortical Projection Column of Rat Vibrissal Cortex , 2010, Cerebral cortex.

[49]  Justus M. Kebschull,et al.  The logic of single-cell projections from visual cortex , 2018, Nature.

[50]  M. Scanziani,et al.  Inhibition of Inhibition in Visual Cortex: The Logic of Connections Between Molecularly Distinct Interneurons , 2013, Nature Neuroscience.

[51]  A. Agmon,et al.  Diverse Types of Interneurons Generate Thalamus-Evoked Feedforward Inhibition in the Mouse Barrel Cortex , 2001, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[52]  Philipp Otto,et al.  webKnossos: efficient online 3D data annotation for connectomics , 2017, Nature Methods.

[53]  Karel Svoboda,et al.  Recruitment of GABAergic Interneurons in the Barrel Cortex during Active Tactile Behavior , 2019, Neuron.

[54]  G. Urban,et al.  Automated synaptic connectivity inference for volume electron microscopy , 2017, Nature Methods.

[55]  Giulio Tononi,et al.  Ultrastructural evidence for synaptic scaling across the wake/sleep cycle , 2017, Science.

[56]  Casey M. Schneider-Mizell,et al.  Quantitative neuroanatomy for connectomics in Drosophila , 2015, bioRxiv.

[57]  H. Taniguchi,et al.  The Spatial and Temporal Origin of Chandelier Cells in Mouse Neocortex , 2013, Science.

[58]  K M Harris,et al.  Occurrence and three-dimensional structure of multiple synapses between individual radiatum axons and their target pyramidal cells in hippocampal area CA1 , 1993, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[59]  E. P. Gardner,et al.  Petilla terminology: nomenclature of features of GABAergic interneurons of the cerebral cortex , 2008, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[60]  Brett J. Graham,et al.  Anatomy and function of an excitatory network in the visual cortex , 2016, Nature.

[61]  Moritz Helmstaedter,et al.  High-accuracy neurite reconstruction for high-throughput neuroanatomy , 2011, Nature Neuroscience.

[62]  Moritz Helmstaedter,et al.  SegEM: Efficient Image Analysis for High-Resolution Connectomics , 2015, Neuron.

[63]  H. Sebastian Seung,et al.  An Error Detection and Correction Framework for Connectomics , 2017, NIPS.

[64]  Bernard Chazelle,et al.  Matching 3D models with shape distributions , 2001, Proceedings International Conference on Shape Modeling and Applications.

[65]  James G. King,et al.  Reconstruction and Simulation of Neocortical Microcircuitry , 2015, Cell.

[66]  Srinivas C. Turaga,et al.  Connectomic reconstruction of the inner plexiform layer in the mouse retina , 2013, Nature.

[67]  N. Kasthuri,et al.  Long-term dendritic spine stability in the adult cortex , 2002, Nature.

[68]  W. Denk,et al.  Serial Block-Face Scanning Electron Microscopy to Reconstruct Three-Dimensional Tissue Nanostructure , 2004, PLoS biology.

[69]  H. Markram,et al.  Regulation of Synaptic Efficacy by Coincidence of Postsynaptic APs and EPSPs , 1997, Science.

[70]  F. Karube,et al.  The Diversity of Cortical Inhibitory Synapses , 2016, Front. Neural Circuits.

[71]  K. Svoboda,et al.  Long-term in vivo imaging of experience-dependent synaptic plasticity in adult cortex , 2002, Nature.