Low-Dose Nonenhanced Head CT Protocol for Follow-Up Evaluation of Children with Ventriculoperitoneal Shunt: Reduction of Radiation and Effect on Image Quality

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Children with a shunt for hydrocephalus often undergo multiple follow-up head CT scans, increasing the risk for long-term effects of ionizing radiation. The purpose of our study was to evaluate if an unenhanced low-dose head CT could consistently provide acceptable image quality and diagnostic information. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ninety-two children (mean age, 9 years; range, 8 months to 21 years; 45 boys and 47 girls) with a shunt for hydrocephalus and no clinical evidence of shunt malfunction who were referred for a follow-up nonenhanced head CT were included in the study. All studies were performed on a 4-section multidetector CT. Two CT studies were selected retrospectively for each patient, 1 performed at standard dose (220 mA) and 1 at low dose (80 mAs). Two radiologists independently evaluated and graded both standard-dose and low-dose studies for various image quality parameters. Attenuation and noise levels were measured, and gray-white differentiation and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were calculated. RESULTS: Low-dose CT resulted in 63% mean dose reduction. All low-dose CT scans were diagnostically acceptable. Image quality parameters were significantly lower at low dose (P = .0001) except for the parameters for streak artifacts (P = .46) and need for further imaging (P = .47), which were higher. Mean noise levels were significantly higher (P = .001) in low-dose studies, whereas CNR was significantly higher in standard dose CT (P = .001). A moderate to perfect agreement was noted between the 2 readers with regard to image quality assessment (65%–99%). CONCLUSION: Low-dose nonenhanced head CT consistently provides diagnostically acceptable images with relevant diagnostic information in children with VP shunts resulting in substantial dose savings.

[1]  A. Staniszewska,et al.  Low-dose protocol for head CT in monitoring hydrocephalus in children. , 2007, Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research.

[2]  D. Abramson Pediatric ophthalmic computed tomographic scanning and associated cancer risk. , 2007, American journal of ophthalmology.

[3]  D. Frush,et al.  Review of radiation risks from computed tomography: essentials for the pediatric surgeon. , 2007, Journal of pediatric surgery.

[4]  M. Kalra,et al.  Optimization of Z-axis automatic exposure control for multidetector row CT evaluation of neck and comparison with fixed tube current technique for image quality and radiation dose. , 2006, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[5]  N. Karabulut,et al.  Low dose CT: practices and strategies of radiologists in university hospitals. , 2006, Diagnostic and interventional radiology.

[6]  S. Browd,et al.  Failure of cerebrospinal fluid shunts: part I: Obstruction and mechanical failure. , 2006, Pediatric neurology.

[7]  Thomas L Toth,et al.  Chest CT performed with z-axis modulation: scanning protocol and radiation dose. , 2005, Radiology.

[8]  P. Vock CT dose reduction in children , 2005, European Radiology.

[9]  T. Mulkens,et al.  Comparison of effective doses for low-dose MDCT and radiographic examination of sinuses in children. , 2005, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[10]  M. Kalra,et al.  Automatic exposure control techniques for individual dose adaptation. , 2005, Radiology.

[11]  D. Jaramillo,et al.  Multidetector row CT in pediatric musculoskeletal imaging , 2005, Pediatric Radiology.

[12]  F. Verdun,et al.  Adult reference levels in diagnostic and interventional radiology for temporary use in Switzerland. , 2004, Radiation protection dosimetry.

[13]  James H Thrall,et al.  Comparison of image quality between conventional and low-dose nonenhanced head CT. , 2004, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[14]  James H Thrall,et al.  Clinical comparison of standard-dose and 50% reduced-dose abdominal CT: effect on image quality. , 2002, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[15]  M. McNitt-Gray AAPM/RSNA Physics Tutorial for Residents: Topics in CT. Radiation dose in CT. , 2002, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[16]  E. Hall,et al.  Lessons we have learned from our children: cancer risks from diagnostic radiology , 2002, Pediatric Radiology.

[17]  W. Kalender,et al.  Generalized multi-dimensional adaptive filtering for conventional and spiral single-slice, multi-slice, and cone-beam CT. , 2001, Medical physics.

[18]  D. Brenner,et al.  Estimated risks of radiation-induced fatal cancer from pediatric CT. , 2001, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[19]  A S Brody,et al.  Minimizing radiation dose for pediatric body applications of single-detector helical CT: strategies at a large Children's Hospital. , 2001, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[20]  R Kötter,et al.  CT of the head by use of reduced current and kilovoltage: relationship between image quality and dose reduction. , 2000, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[21]  G. Enríquez,et al.  Low-dose high-resolution CT of the chest in children and young adults: dose, cooperation, artifact incidence, and image quality. , 2000, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[22]  D. Frush,et al.  Helical CT in children: technical considerations and body applications. , 1998, Radiology.

[23]  B. Rosen,et al.  Contrast‐to‐noise ratio in functional MRI of relative cerebral blood volume with sprodiamide injection , 1997, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[24]  W Huda,et al.  An approach for the estimation of effective radiation dose at CT in pediatric patients. , 1997, Radiology.

[25]  K S Pentlow,et al.  Radiation dose in CT. , 1992, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[26]  A. E. Robinson,et al.  Radiation dose reduction in pediatric CT , 2006, Pediatric Radiology.

[27]  K. White Invited article: Helical/spiral CT scanning: a pediatric radiology perspective , 2005, Pediatric Radiology.

[28]  J. Remy,et al.  Multi-detector row spiral CT angiography of the thoracic outlet: dose reduction with anatomically adapted online tube current modulation and preset dose savings. , 2004, Radiology.

[29]  D. Jimenez,et al.  Epidemiology of cerebrospinal fluid shunting. , 1995, Pediatric neurosurgery.

[30]  Timothy J Hall Aapm/rsna Physics Tutorial for Residents: Topics in Us , 1657 .