Work-related lesions of the supraspinatus tendon: a case–control study

ObjectivesTo examine the dose–response relationship between cumulative duration of work with highly elevated arms (work above shoulder level) as well as of manual material handling and ruptures of the supraspinatus tendon in a population-based case–control study.MethodsIn 14 radiologic practices, we recruited 483 male patients aged 25–65 with radiographically confirmed partial (n = 385) or total (n = 98) supraspinatus tears associated with shoulder pain. A total of 300 male control subjects were recruited. Data were gathered in a structured personal interview. To calculate cumulative exposure, the self-reported duration of lifting/carrying of heavy loads (>20 kg) as well as the duration of work with highly elevated arms was added up over the entire working life.ResultsThe results of our study support a dose–response relationship between cumulative duration of work with highly elevated arms and symptomatic supraspinatus tendon tears. For a cumulative duration of >3,195 h work above shoulder level, the risk of a supraspinatus tendon rupture is elevated to 2.0 (95% CI 1.1–3.5), adjusted for age, region, lifting/carrying of heavy loads, handheld vibration, apparatus gymnastics/shot put/javelin/hammer throwing/wrestling, and tennis. The cumulative duration of carrying/lifting of heavy loads also yields a positive dose–response relation with disease (independent from work above shoulder level and from handheld vibration), with an adjusted odds ratio of 1.8 (95% CI 1.0–3.2) in the highest exposure category (>77 h). We find an increased risk for subjects exposed to handheld vibration with an adjusted OR of 3.2 (95% CI 1.7–5.9) in the highest exposure category (16 years or more in the job with exposure), but a clear dose–response relationship is lacking.ConclusionsThis study points to a potential etiologic role of long-term cumulative effects of work with highly elevated arms and heavy lifting/carrying on shoulder tendon disorders.

[1]  J. H. Andersen,et al.  Is supraspinatus pathology as defined by magnetic resonance imaging associated with clinical sign of shoulder impingement? , 1999, Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery.

[2]  J P Bonde,et al.  Work related shoulder disorders: quantitative exposure-response relations with reference to arm posture , 2004, Occupational and Environmental Medicine.

[3]  R Seil,et al.  Age-related prevalence of rotator cuff tears in asymptomatic shoulders. , 1999, Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery.

[4]  D. Snashall ABC of work related disorders , 1999 .

[5]  Svend Erik Mathiassen,et al.  Work above shoulder level and degenerative alterations of the rotator cuff tendons: a magnetic resonance imaging study. , 2004, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[6]  [Rotator cuff tear--an occupational disease? An epidemiological analysis]. , 2006, Zeitschrift fur Orthopadie und ihre Grenzgebiete.

[7]  F. Gohlke [Ultrasonographic appearance of the rotator cuff in elderly subjects]. , 1993, Der Orthopade.

[8]  A. Silman,et al.  Occupational risk factors for shoulder pain: a systematic review , 2000, Occupational and environmental medicine.

[9]  A Burdorf,et al.  In musculoskeletal epidemiology are we asking the unanswerable in questionnaires on physical load? , 1999, Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health.

[10]  M. Zlatkin,et al.  Abnormal findings on magnetic resonance images of asymptomatic shoulders. , 1995, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[11]  Sigurd Mikkelsen,et al.  Risk of shoulder tendinitis in relation to shoulder loads in monotonous repetitive work. , 2002, American journal of industrial medicine.

[12]  Alan B. Tyson,et al.  Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Asymptomatic Shoulder of Overhead Athletes , 2003, The American journal of sports medicine.

[13]  B. Jonsson,et al.  Standardised Nordic questionnaires for the analysis of musculoskeletal symptoms. , 1987, Applied ergonomics.

[14]  Kathrin Scheele Ein Vergleich der anerkannten Berufskrankheiten in den EU-Mitgliedstaaten am Beispiel von berufsbedingten Erkrankungen des Schultergürtels , 2009 .

[15]  O. Krief,et al.  Shoulder pain and disability: comparison with MR findings. , 2006, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[16]  A J van der Beek,et al.  Assessment of mechanical exposure in ergonomic epidemiology. , 1998, Occupational and environmental medicine.

[17]  A Kilbom,et al.  Evaluation of perceived and self-reported manual forces exerted in occupational materials handling. , 1996, Applied ergonomics.

[18]  M Hagberg,et al.  ABC of Work Related Disorders: Neck and arm disorders , 1996 .

[19]  R Kadefors,et al.  Assessment of workload and arm position during different work sequences: a study with portable devices on construction workers. , 1999, Applied ergonomics.

[20]  T. Armstrong,et al.  A conceptual model for work-related neck and upper-limb musculoskeletal disorders. , 1993, Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health.

[21]  Alwin Luttmann,et al.  Cumulative occupational lumbar load and lumbar disc disease – results of a German multi-center case-control study (EPILIFT) , 2009, BMC musculoskeletal disorders.

[22]  S Kumar,et al.  Perception of posture of short duration in the spatial and temporal domains. , 1993, Applied ergonomics.

[23]  C Milgrom,et al.  Rotator-cuff changes in asymptomatic adults. The effect of age, hand dominance and gender. , 1995, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.