Abstract The institutional environment of rail transport has changed as a result of recent European directives, but the changes have taken different forms from one country to another. In the case of international maritime chains, the development of door‐to‐door services makes inland haulage from the loading and discharging ports extremely important, and it highlights the need to reshape the rail freight industry. This paper analyses the degree of involvement of different actors drawn from the maritime industry in developing and commercializing rail services in the changing regulatory environment. Several maritime operators, shipping lines, port‐handling companies and port authorities have been involved in some container rail services since the early days of liberalization. Their commitments take very different forms, however. Whereas contracts are mainly used for the provision of service, particularly for train haulage, integration by means of shareholding or creating subsidiaries or joint ventures is used for marketing. Important differences between France, the UK, Germany and the Netherlands are detailed. In the latter two countries, there is more involvement in the provision of rail services. Marketing rail services appear to be the main strategic issue for the maritime operators in all four countries
[1]
C. Ménard.
The Economics of Hybrid Organizations
,
2004
.
[2]
Brian Slack,et al.
Pawns in the Game: Ports in a Global Transportation System
,
1993
.
[3]
H. Arjen van Klink,et al.
Gateways and intermodalism
,
1998
.
[4]
Photis M. Panayides,et al.
Economic organization of intermodal transport
,
2002
.
[5]
H. Meersman,et al.
Do mergers and alliances influence European shipping and port competition?
,
2000
.
[6]
B Kuipers.
THE RISE AND FALL OF THE MARITIME MAINPORT
,
2002
.
[7]
T. Notteboom,et al.
The interdependence between liner shipping networks and intermodal networks
,
2002
.
[8]
M. Kopecky.
Fret ferroviaire français la nouvelle bataille du rail
,
2003
.
[9]
O. Williamson.
Comparative Economic Organization: The Analysis of Discrete Structural Alternatives
,
1994
.
[10]
T. Notteboom,et al.
Structural changes in logistics: how will port authorities face the challenge?
,
2001
.