An interactive multiobjective approach to harvest decisions in forest planning.

A hierarchical approach to forest planning is formulated, where harvest schedules are first determined, followed by a decision about harvest methods (harvest regime). Choice of harvest methods is particularly important because of concerns about harvest‐related site disturbance. In the decision model developed in this article, determination of a harvest regime is expressed as a multiple‐objective decision incorporating maximization of net present value and minimization of cumulative site disturbance for different site classes, subject to maintaining high levels of production, an even flow of timber, and avoiding adjacency violations. The search for preferred harvest regimes is performed interactively over a set of non‐dominated harvest schedules with alternative aspiration levels identified for the various objectives to reflect values of different stakeholders.

[1]  John Nelson,et al.  Area-based harvest scheduling and allocation of forest land using methods for multiple-criteria decision making , 1993 .

[2]  Ilan Vertinsky,et al.  Linking multiple accounts with GIS as decision support system to resolve forestry/wildlife conflicts , 1994 .

[3]  A. Weintraub,et al.  Heuristic procedures for solving mixed-integer harvest scheduling–transportation planning models , 1995 .

[4]  Pekka Korhonen,et al.  Solving generalized goal programming problems using a visual interactive approach , 1986 .

[5]  M. S. Jamnick,et al.  An operational, spatially constrained harvest scheduling model , 1990 .

[6]  Jyrki Kangas,et al.  Multiple‐use planning of forest resources by using the analytic hierarchy process , 1992 .

[7]  Ralph E. Steuer,et al.  An Interactive Multiple-Objective Linear Programming Approach to a Problem in Forest Management , 1978, Oper. Res..

[8]  A. Wierzbicki On the completeness and constructiveness of parametric characterizations to vector optimization problems , 1986 .

[9]  F. Barahona,et al.  A column generation algorithm for solving general forest planning problems with adjacency constraints , 1994 .

[10]  Jyrki Kangas,et al.  Operationalization of biological diversity as a decision objective in tactical forest planning , 1996 .

[11]  E. Downey Brill,et al.  The Use of Optimization Models in Public-Sector Planning , 1979 .

[12]  Jyrki Kangas,et al.  An approach to public participation in strategic forest management planning , 1994 .

[13]  Hirotaka Nakayama,et al.  An application of a multi-objective programming technique to construction accuracy control of cable-stayed bridges , 1995 .

[14]  B. Bruce Bare,et al.  Spatially constrained timber harvest scheduling , 1989 .

[15]  Hirotaka Nakayama Trade-off analysis using parametric optimization techniques , 1992 .

[16]  Hirotaka Nakayama,et al.  Aspiration Level Approach to Interactive Multi-Objective Programming and Its Applications , 1995 .

[17]  Pekka Korhonen,et al.  A Visual Interactive Method for Solving the Multiple-Criteria Problem , 1986 .

[18]  Jyrki Kangas,et al.  A heuristic optimization method for forest planning and decision making , 1993 .

[19]  A. Howard A critical look at multiple criteria decision making techniques with reference to forestry applications , 1991 .

[20]  L. S. Davis,et al.  Interactive resolution of multi-objective forest planning problems with shadow price and parametric analysis , 1995 .

[21]  Pekka Korhonen,et al.  Interactive, multiobjective programming for forest resources management , 1994 .

[22]  J. D. Brodie,et al.  Comparison of a random search algorithm and mixed integer programming for solving area-based forest plans. , 1990 .

[23]  H. Simon,et al.  Models Of Man : Social And Rational , 1957 .

[24]  Michael J. Magazine,et al.  An Interactive Heuristic Approach for Multi-Objective Integer-Programming Problems , 1986 .

[25]  Guillermo A. Mendoza,et al.  Multiple objective forest land management planning: An illustration , 1988 .

[26]  Ilan Vertinsky,et al.  A Hierarchical-GIS-Based Decision Model for Forest Management: The Systems Approach , 1994 .

[27]  Pekka Korhonen,et al.  A pareto race , 1988 .

[28]  Pekka Korhonen,et al.  A visual reference direction approach to solving discrete multiple criteria problems , 1988 .

[29]  A. Wierzbicki A Mathematical Basis for Satisficing Decision Making , 1982 .