The acquisition of tense-aspect: Converging evidence from corpora and telicity ratings

The aspect hypothesis ( Andersen & Shirai, 1994 ) proposes that language learners are initially influenced by the inherent semantic aspect in the acquisition of tense and aspect (TA) morphology. Perfective past emerges earlier with accomplishments and achievements and progressive with activities. Although this hypothesis has been extensively studied, there have been no analyses of the frequency, form, and function of relevant types and tokens in the input. This article reports the results of 2 corpus-based studies investigating how various features of the input—frequency distributions, reliabilities of form–function mapping, and prototypicality of lexical aspect—affect TA morphology. Study I determined the relative frequency profiles of exemplars of English TA and employed various statistics to determine the associations between particular verb–aspect combinations. Study II expanded the aspect hypothesis, examining whether native speakers judge the most frequent forms in isolation to be more prototypical in lexical aspect. Analyses were then matched against acquisition data for different TA patterns by adult learners of English ( Bardovi-Harlig, 2000 ) to determine whether the verbs' acquisition order is determined by their frequency, form, and function in the input. Rather than testifying to the effect of 1 factor alone, the results suggest that frequency, distinctiveness, and prototypicality jointly drive acquisition. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

[1]  Nick C. Ellis,et al.  Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics and Second Language Acquisition , 2008 .

[2]  R. Dekeyser,et al.  Explaining the “Natural Order of L2 Morpheme Acquisition” in English: A Meta-analysis of Multiple Determinants , 2001 .

[3]  Yasuhiro Shirai,et al.  The Primacy of Aspect in First and Second Language Acquisition , 1996 .

[4]  Stefan Th. Gries,et al.  Collostructions: Investigating the interaction of words and constructions , 2003 .

[5]  R. Ellis.  Introduction: Investigating Form‐Focused Instruction , 2001 .

[6]  Carlota S. Smith,et al.  The Parameter of Aspect , 1991 .

[7]  A. Goldberg.  Constructions at Work: The Nature of Generalization in Language , 2006 .

[8]  William Croft,et al.  Radical Construction Grammar: Syntactic Theory in Typological Perspective , 2001 .

[9]  Adele E. Goldberg,et al.  Learning argument structure generalizations , 2004 .

[10]  Wayne D. Gray,et al.  Basic objects in natural categories , 1976, Cognitive Psychology.

[11]  Kathleen Bardovi-Harlig,et al.  The Role of Lexical Aspect in the Acquisition of Tense and Aspect , 1995 .

[12]  Nick C. Ellis,et al.  USAGE-BASED AND FORM-FOCUSED LANGUAGE ACQUISITION: The associative learning of constructions, learned attention, and the limited L2 endstate , 2008 .

[13]  Nick C. Ellis,et al.  Construction Learning as a Function of Frequency, Frequency Distribution, and Function. , 2009 .

[14]  N. Ellis.  Selective Attention and Transfer Phenomena in L2 Acquisition: Contingency, Cue Competition, Salience, Interference, Overshadowing, Blocking, and Perceptual Learning , 2006 .

[15]  Geoffrey Leech,et al.  Corpus Annotation: Linguistic Information from Computer Text Corpora , 1997 .

[16]  G. Āllport.  The Psycho-Biology of Language. , 1936 .

[17]  K. Bardovi-Harlig.  Tense and aspect in second language acquisition : form, meaning, and use , 2000 .

[18]  S. Gries,et al.  Extending collostructional analysis: A corpus-based perspective on `alternations' , 2004 .

[19]  Roger W. Brown,et al.  A First Language: The Early Stages , 1974 .

[20]  Nick C. Ellis,et al.  Optimizing the Input: Frequency and Sampling in Usage‐Based and Form‐Focused Learning , 2009 .

[21]  Stefanie Wulff,et al.  Do foreign language learners also have constructions ? Evidence from priming , sorting , and corpora * , 2005 .

[22]  Anderson,et al.  LEVv The Effects of Category Generalizations and Instance Similarity on Schema Abstraction , 2022 .

[23]  John R. Anderson,et al.  The effects of information order and learning mode on schema abstraction , 1984, Memory & cognition.

[24]  N. Ellis.  Language Acquisition as Rational Contingency Learning , 2006 .

[25]  Roger Garside,et al.  A hybrid grammatical tagger: CLAWS4 , 1997 .

[26]  Dan I. Slobin,et al.  Introduction: the acquisition of tense-aspect morphology , 1998 .

[27]  A. Goldberg,et al.  Input Effects Within a Constructionist Framework , 2009 .

[28]  Morten H. Christiansen,et al.  Language as shaped by the brain. , 2008, The Behavioral and brain sciences.

[29]  Roger W. Andersen,et al.  Models, Processes, Principles, and Strategies: Second Language Acquisition in and out of the Classroom. , 1988 .

[30]  Kathleen Bardovi-Harlig,et al.  Conspiring Factors in Second Language Acquisition of Tense-Aspect Morphology , 1998 .

[31]  Nick C. Ellis,et al.  The Dynamics of Second Language Emergence: Cycles of Language Use, Language Change, and Language Acquisition , 2008 .

[32]  A. Ninio.  Pathbreaking verbs in syntactic development and the question of prototypical transitivity , 1999, Journal of Child Language.

[33]  Yasuhiro Shirai,et al.  The Acquisition of Tense-Aspect Morphology: A Prototype Account. , 1995 .

[34]  Nick C. Ellis,et al.  Frequency effects in language acquisition: A review with implications for theories of implicit and explicit language acquisition. (Target article) , 2002 .

[35]  Laura Collins,et al.  The Roles of L1 Influence and Lexical Aspect in the Acquisition of Temporal Morphology. , 2002 .

[36]  R. Nosofsky.  Similarity, frequency, and category representations. , 1988 .

[37]  N. Ellis.  Temporal Cognition and Temporal Language the First and Second Times Around. Commentary on McCormack and Hoerl , 2008 .

[38]  R. Nosofsky.  Exemplar-Based Accounts of Relations Between Classification, Recognition, and Typicality , 1988 .

[39]  Anat Ninio,et al.  Language and the Learning Curve: A New Theory of Syntactic Development , 2006 .

[40]  M. Tomasello.  Constructing a Language , 2005 .

[41]  Roger W. Andersen,et al.  Progression & regression in language: Four operating principles and input distribution as explanations for underdeveloped and mature morphological systems , 1994 .

[42]  Vyvyan Evans,et al.  The Structure of Time , 2003 .

[43]  E. Rosch.  Cognitive Representations of Semantic Categories. , 1975 .

[44]  Yasuhiro Shirai,et al.  The Acquisition of Lexical and Grammatical Aspect , 2000 .

[45]  Walcir Cardoso,et al.  Some Input on the Easy/Difficult Grammar Question: An Empirical Study , 2009 .

[46]  B. MacWhinney,et al.  The Handbook of East Asian Psycholinguistics: The competition model , 2006 .

[47]  Marina K. Burt,et al.  NATURAL SEQUENCES IN CHILD SECOND LANGUAGE ACQUISITION1 , 1974 .

[48]  G. Murphy,et al.  The Big Book of Concepts , 2002 .

[49]  Adele E. Goldberg.  Constructions: a new theoretical approach to language , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[50]  B. MacWhinney.  Applying the Competition Model to bilingualism , 1987, Applied Psycholinguistics.

[51]  Rita C Simpson-Vlach,et al.  The MICASE Handbook: A Resource for Users of the Michigan Corpus of Academic Spoken English , 2006 .

[52]  R. Rescorla.  Probability of shock in the presence and absence of CS in fear conditioning. , 1968, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.

[53]  Diane Larsen-Freeman,et al.  Language emergence: Implications for applied linguistics - Introduction to the special issue , 2006 .

[54]  G. Zipf.  The Psycho-Biology Of Language: AN INTRODUCTION TO DYNAMIC PHILOLOGY , 1999 .

[55]  A. Tversky.  Features of Similarity , 1977 .

[56]  Luc Steels,et al.  Language as a Complex Adaptive System , 2000, PPSN.

[57]  T. McCormack,et al.  Temporal Decentering and the Development of Temporal Concepts , 2008 .

[58]  S. Gries,et al.  Do foreign language learners also have constructions , 2005 .

[59]  Cognitive and neural prerequisites for time in language: Any answers? , 2008 .

[60]  Yasuhiro Shirai,et al.  Discourse Motivations for Some Cognitive Acquisition Principles , 1994, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.