Simulation of a MR-PET protocol for staging of head-and-neck cancer including Dixon MR for attenuation correction.

PURPOSE To simulate and optimize a MR protocol for squamous cell cancer of the head and neck (HNSCC) patients for potential future use in an integrated whole-body MR-PET scanner. MATERIALS AND METHODS On a clinical 3T scanner, which is the basis for a recently introduced fully integrated whole-body MR-PET, 20 patients with untreated HNSCC routinely staged with 18F-FDG PET/CT underwent a dedicated MR protocol for the neck. Moreover, a whole-body Dixon MR-sequence was applied, which is used for attenuation correction on a recently introduced hybrid MR-PET scanner. In a subset of patients volume-interpolated-breathhold (VIBE) T1w-sequences for lungs and liver were added. Total imaging time was analyzed for both groups. The quality of the delineation of the primary tumor (scale 0-3) and the presence or absence of lymph node metastases (scale 1-5) was evaluated for CT, MR, PET/CT and a combination of MR and PET to ensure that the MR-PET fusion does not cause a loss of diagnostic capability. PET was used to identify distant metastases. The PET dataset for simulated MR/PET was based on a segmentation of the CT data into 4 classes according to the approach of the Dixon MR-sequence for MR-PET. Standard of reference was histopathology in 19 cases. In one case no histopathological confirmation of a primary tumor could be achieved. RESULTS Mean imaging time was 35:17 min (range: 31:08-42:42 min) for the protocol including sequences for local staging and attenuation correction and 44:17 min (range: 35:44-54:58) for the extended protocol. Although not statistically significant a combination of MR and PET performed better in the delineation of the primary tumor (mean 2.20) compared to CT (mean 1.40), MR (1.95) and PET/CT (2.15) especially in patients with dental implants. PET/CT and combining MR and PET performed slightly better than CT and MR for the assessment of lymph node metastases. Two patients with distant metastases were only identified by PET. CONCLUSION We established a potential MR-protocol to be used for HNSCC patients in a recently introduced MR-PET scanner. The proposed protocol can be performed in an acceptable time frame and did not lead to a loss of diagnostic capability compared to PET/CT.

[1]  F. Wippold Head and neck imaging: The role of CT and MRI , 2007, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[2]  Axel Martinez-Möller,et al.  PET-MRI fusion in head-and-neck oncology: current status and implications for hybrid PET/MRI. , 2012, Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.

[3]  J. Debatin,et al.  HASTE MRI versus chest radiography in the detection of pulmonary nodules: comparison with MDCT. , 2004, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[4]  M. Castillo,et al.  Squamous cell carcinoma of the oropharynx and oral cavity: how imaging makes a difference. , 1998, Seminars in ultrasound, CT, and MR.

[5]  Synchronous and metachronous head and neck carcinomas , 1994, Cancer.

[6]  Nassir Navab,et al.  Tissue Classification as a Potential Approach for Attenuation Correction in Whole-Body PET/MRI: Evaluation with PET/CT Data , 2009, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[7]  G. Snow,et al.  The Incidence of Micrometastases in Neck Dissection Specimens Obtained From Elective Neck Dissections , 1996, The Laryngoscope.

[8]  A. Mueller,et al.  Head and neck cancer in Germany: a site-specific analysis of survival of the Thuringian cancer registration database , 2009, Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology.

[9]  Christoph Palm,et al.  MR-based attenuation correction for torso-PET/MR imaging: pitfalls in mapping MR to CT data , 2008, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[10]  Jonathan R. Clark,et al.  Role of pretreatment 18FDG‐PET/CT in surgical decision‐making for head and neck cancers , 2010, Head & neck.

[11]  Zoran Rumboldt,et al.  Imaging in head and neck cancer , 2006, Current treatment options in oncology.

[12]  Thomas Beyer,et al.  X-ray-based attenuation correction for positron emission tomography/computed tomography scanners. , 2003, Seminars in nuclear medicine.

[13]  M. Reiser,et al.  Whole-body MRI for the staging and follow-up of patients with metastasis. , 2009, European journal of radiology.

[14]  Keigo Endo,et al.  Additional value of integrated PET/CT over PET alone in the initial staging and follow up of head and neck malignancy , 2010, Annals of nuclear medicine.

[15]  Ernst J. Rummeny,et al.  Value of a Dixon-based MR/PET attenuation correction sequence for the localization and evaluation of PET-positive lesions , 2011, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[16]  A. King,et al.  Comparison of CT and MR imaging for the detection of extranodal neoplastic spread in metastatic neck nodes. , 2004, European journal of radiology.

[17]  M. Schwaiger,et al.  Clinical Applications of FDG PET and PET/CT in Head and Neck Cancer , 2009, Journal of oncology.

[18]  Gerald Antoch,et al.  Combined PET/MRI: a new dimension in whole-body oncology imaging? , 2009, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[19]  Chun-Ta Liao,et al.  Staging of untreated nasopharyngeal carcinoma with PET/CT: comparison with conventional imaging work-up , 2009, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[20]  R. Wahl,et al.  The role of positron emission tomography and computed tomography fusion in the management of early-stage and advanced-stage primary head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. , 2006, Archives of otolaryngology--head & neck surgery.

[21]  G. Snow,et al.  Screening for Distant Metastases in Patients With Head and Neck Cancer , 2000, The Laryngoscope.