Detection of modiolar proximity through bipolar impedance measurements

To test the hypothesis that bipolar electrical impedance measurements in perimodiolar cochlear implants (CIs) may be used to differentiate between perimodiolar insertion technique favoring proximity to the modiolus or lateral wall.

[1]  Margaret W Skinner,et al.  Role of Electrode Placement as a Contributor to Variability in Cochlear Implant Outcomes , 2008, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.

[2]  J Thomas Roland,et al.  A Model for Cochlear Implant Electrode Insertion and Force Evaluation: Results with a New Electrode Design and Insertion Technique , 2005, The Laryngoscope.

[3]  J. Noble,et al.  Impact of Intrascalar Electrode Location, Electrode Type, and Angular Insertion Depth on Residual Hearing in Cochlear Implant Patients: Preliminary Results , 2015, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.

[4]  J Thomas Roland,et al.  Fluoroscopically Assisted Cochlear Implantation , 2003, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.

[5]  M W Skinner,et al.  Cochlear implants: three-dimensional localization by means of coregistration of CT and conventional radiographs. , 2001, Radiology.

[6]  F. Spelman,et al.  Quantitative in vivo measurements of inner ear tissue resistivities. I. In vitro characterization , 1993, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[7]  Claudiu Treaba,et al.  Real‐time measurement of electrode impedance during intracochlear electrode insertion , 2013, The Laryngoscope.

[8]  Filiep Vanpoucke,et al.  Identification of the impedance model of an implanted cochlear prosthesis from intracochlear potential measurements , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[9]  Omid Majdani,et al.  Automatic Segmentation of Intracochlear Anatomy in Conventional CT , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[10]  Jianbai Wang,et al.  A Thin-Film Cochlear Electrode Array With Integrated Position Sensing , 2009, Journal of Microelectromechanical Systems.

[11]  D. Brynn Hibbert,et al.  Voltammetry of Platinum in Artificial Perilymph Solution , 2001 .

[12]  F. Spelman,et al.  Lumped-parameter model for in vivo cochlear stimulation , 1993, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[13]  C. Jolly,et al.  Quadrupolar stimulation for cochlear prostheses: modeling and experimental data , 1996, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[14]  Wei-Dian Lai,et al.  A novel approach to compute the impedance matrix of a cochlear implant system incorporating an electrode-tissue interface based on finite element method , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics.

[15]  G. Wanna,et al.  The limitations of computed tomography in adult cochlear implant evaluation. , 2014, American journal of otolaryngology.

[16]  F. Spelman,et al.  System for making quantitative, in vivo measurements of inner ear tissue impedances , 1989, Images of the Twenty-First Century. Proceedings of the Annual International Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society,.

[17]  Benoit M Dawant,et al.  Impact of electrode design and surgical approach on scalar location and cochlear implant outcomes , 2014, The Laryngoscope.

[18]  T. Hullar,et al.  Verification of Computed Tomographic Estimates of Cochlear Implant Array Position: A Micro-CT and Histologic Analysis , 2011, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.

[19]  G M Clark,et al.  Surgical implications of perimodiolar cochlear implant electrode design: avoiding intracochlear damage and scala vestibuli insertion , 2001, Cochlear implants international.