Honesty: One Effect of Primed Religious Representations

Most demonstrations of the automatic activation of mental representations and resulting behavioral effects have been conducted in the context of specific stereotypes. The main purpose of these studies was to test whether primed religious representations can have automatic influences on relevant (prosocial) behavior (Study 1) regardless of prior religious belief (Study 2). Study 1 found that participants primed with religious representations (religious words) cheated significantly less on a subsequent task. Study 2 replicated the results of Study 1 with subliminal presentations of religious words and further found that participant's intrinsic religiosity had no influence on rates of cheating with the prime received. These results provide the first known demonstration of religious representations automatically influencing behavior. Implications for the psychology of religion are discussed.

[1]  Joseph Cesario,et al.  Automatic social behavior as motivated preparation to interact. , 2006, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[2]  J. Blascovich,et al.  The Nonconscious Influence of Religious Symbols in Motivated Performance Situations , 2005, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[3]  J. L. Wenger.  RESEARCH: The Automatic Activation of Religious Concepts: Implications for Religious Orientations , 2004 .

[4]  A. Dijksterhuis,et al.  Effect of Social Category Priming on Personal Attitudes , 2003, Psychological science.

[5]  Arie W Kruglanski,et al.  Leading us not unto temptation: momentary allurements elicit overriding goal activation. , 2003, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[6]  R. Kinnier,et al.  A Short List of Universal Moral Values , 2000 .

[7]  J. Bargh,et al.  Automaticity of social behavior: direct effects of trait construct and stereotype-activation on action. , 1996, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[8]  K. Hart,et al.  Cheating, Lying, and Moral Reasoning by Religious and Secular High School Students , 1996 .

[9]  J. Bargh,et al.  Attractiveness of the underling: an automatic power --> sex association and its consequences for sexual harassment and aggression. , 1995, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[10]  L. Newman,et al.  Assimilation and Contrast Effects in Spontaneous Trait Inference , 1990 .

[11]  Richard L. Gorsuch,et al.  Intrinsic/extrinsic measurement: I/E-Revised and single-item scales. , 1989 .

[12]  M. Donahue.  Intrinsic and extrinsic religiousness: Review and meta-analysis. , 1985 .

[13]  J. S. Leming,et al.  Cheating Behavior, Subject Variables, and Components of the Internal-External Scale under High and Low Risk Conditions , 1980 .

[14]  J. Freedman,et al.  Compliance without pressure: The effect of guilt. , 1967 .

[15]  G. Āllport,et al.  Personal religious orientation and prejudice. , 1967, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[16]  J. B. Maller,et al.  Studies in the Nature of Character. , 1930 .

[17]  Henk Aarts,et al.  The power of the subliminal: On subliminal persuasion and other potential applications , 2005 .

[18]  Ran R. Hassin,et al.  Who is the controller of controlled processes , 2005 .

[19]  Tom Postmes,et al.  Seeing One Thing and Doing Another : Contrast Effects in Automatic Behavior , 2004 .

[20]  J. Bargh,et al.  The perception–behavior expressway: Automatic effects of social perception on social behavior. , 2001 .

[21]  T. Chartrand,et al.  The mind in the middle: A practical guide to priming and automaticity research. , 2000 .

[22]  D. Wegner,et al.  Control and automaticity in social life. , 1998 .

[23]  Ştefan Boncu,et al.  E. Tory Higgins si Arie Kruglanski (coord.), Social psychology. Handbook of basic principles, Guilford, New York, 1997 , 1998 .

[24]  J. Bargh.  The automaticity of everyday life. , 1997 .

[25]  J. Bargh.  Automaticity in social psychology. , 1996 .

[26]  J. Bargh,et al.  Automaticity in action: The unconscious as repository of chronic goals and motives. , 1996 .

[27]  E. Higgins.  Knowledge activation: Accessibility, applicability, and salience. , 1996 .

[28]  J. Bargh,et al.  Environmental control of goal-directed action: automatic and strategic contingencies between situations and behavior. , 1994, Nebraska Symposium on Motivation. Nebraska Symposium on Motivation.

[29]  P. Devine.  Stereotypes and prejudice: Their automatic and controlled components. , 1989 .

[30]  M. Sherif,et al.  The psychology of attitudes. , 1946, Psychological review.

[31]  M. May,et al.  Studies in the nature of character, [part] 1: Studies in deceit: book 1, General methods and results; book 2, Statistical methods and results. , 1930 .