Evaluation of reconstruction algorithms for triple-head coincidence imaging by hot sphere detectability

Simulations and measurements of triple head PET acquisitions of a hot sphere phantom were performed to evaluate the performance of two different reconstruction algorithms (projection based ML-EM and listmode ML-EM)for triple head gamma camera coincidence systems. A geometric simulator assuming a detector with 100 percent detection efficiency and only detection of trues was used. The resolution was equal to the camera system. The measurements were performed with a triple headed gamma camera. Simulated and measured data were stored in listmode format, which allowed the flexibility for different reconstruction algorithms. As a measure for the performance the hot spot detectability was taken because tumor imaging is the most important clinical application for gamma camera coincidence systems. The detectability was evaluated by calculating the recovered contrast and the contrast-to-noise ratio. Results show a slightly improved contrast but a clearly higher contrast-to-noise ratio for list mode reconstruction.

[1]  Xuan Liu,et al.  Exact rebinning methods for 3D PET , 1998, 1998 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record. 1998 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference (Cat. No.98CH36255).

[2]  P D Acton,et al.  PET imaging using gamma camera systems: a review. , 1996, Nuclear medicine communications.

[3]  T K Lewellen,et al.  PET imaging using dual-headed gamma cameras: an update. , 1999, Nuclear medicine communications.

[4]  Gabor T. Herman,et al.  Image Reconstruction From Projections , 1975, Real Time Imaging.

[5]  K. Tam,et al.  Three-dimensional imaging in the position camera using Fourier techniques. , 1977, Physics in medicine and biology.

[6]  T. Lewellen,et al.  Hot sphere detection limits for a dual head coincidence imaging system , 1999 .

[7]  H H Barrett,et al.  List-mode likelihood. , 1997, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[8]  K. Lange,et al.  EM reconstruction algorithms for emission and transmission tomography. , 1984, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[9]  Fast and exact Fourier rebinning using John's equation , 1999, 1999 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium. Conference Record. 1999 Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference (Cat. No.99CH37019).

[10]  Harrison H. Barrett,et al.  Three-dimensional reconstruction from planar projections , 1980 .

[11]  Bjorn De Sutter,et al.  A Fast Algorithm to Calculate the Exact Radiological Path through a Pixel or Voxel Space , 1998 .

[12]  Michel Defrise,et al.  A new three-dimensional reconstruction method for positron cameras using plane detectors , 1988 .

[13]  D. Townsend,et al.  Three-Dimensional Image Reconstruction for a Positron Camera with Limited Angular Acceptance , 1980, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[14]  K. Erlandsson,et al.  Fast accurate iterative reconstruction for low-statistics positron volume imaging. , 1998, Physics in medicine and biology.

[15]  K. Erlandsson,et al.  Fast accurate iterative three-dimensional Bayesian reconstruction for low-statistics positron volume imaging , 1997, 1997 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record.

[16]  L. Shepp,et al.  Maximum Likelihood Reconstruction for Emission Tomography , 1983, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.