Grand challenges in the science of wind energy

A multifaceted future for wind power Modern wind turbines already represent a tightly optimized confluence of materials science and aerodynamic engineering. Veers et al. review the challenges and opportunities for further expanding this technology, with an emphasis on the need for interdisciplinary collaboration. They highlight the need to better understand atmospheric physics in the regions where taller turbines will operate as well as the materials constraints associated with the scale-up. The mutual interaction of turbine sites with one another and with the evolving features of the overall electricity grid will furthermore necessitate a systems approach to future development. Science, this issue p. eaau2027 BACKGROUND A growing global population and an increasing demand for energy services are expected to result in substantially greater deployment of clean energy sources. Wind energy is already playing a role as a mainstream source of electricity, driven by decades of scientific discovery and technology development. Additional research and exploration of design options are needed to drive innovation to meet future demand and functionality. The growing scale and deployment expansion will, however, push the technology into areas of both scientific and engineering uncertainty. This Review explores grand challenges in wind energy research that must be addressed to enable wind energy to supply one-third to one-half, or even more, of the world’s electricity needs. ADVANCES Drawing from a recent international workshop, we identify three grand challenges in wind energy research that require further progress from the scientific community: (i) improved understanding of the physics of atmospheric flow in the critical zone of wind power plant operation, (ii) materials and system dynamics of individual wind turbines, and (iii) optimization and control of fleets of wind plants comprising hundreds of individual generators working synergistically within the larger electric grid system. These grand challenges are interrelated, so progress in each domain must build on concurrent advances in the other two. Characterizing the wind power plant operating zone in the atmosphere will be essential to designing the next generation of even-larger wind turbines and achieving dynamic control of the machines. Enhanced forecasting of the nature of the atmospheric inflow will subsequently enable control of the plant in the manner necessary for grid support. These wind energy science challenges bridge previously separable geospatial and temporal scales that extend from the physics of the atmosphere to flexible aeroelastic and mechanical systems more than 200 m in diameter and, ultimately, to the electrical integration with and support for a continent-sized grid system. OUTLOOK Meeting the grand research challenges in wind energy science will enable the wind power plant of the future to supply many of the anticipated electricity system needs at a low cost. The interdependence of the grand challenges requires expansion of integrated and cross-disciplinary research efforts. Methods for handling and streamlining exchange of vast quantities of information across many disciplines (both experimental and computational) will also be crucial to enabling successful integrated research. Moreover, research in fields related to computational and data science will support the research community in seeking to further integrate models and data across scales and disciplines. The cascade of scales underlying wind energy scientific grand challenges. Length scales from weather systems at a global level down the boundary layer of a wind turbine airfoil and time scales from seasonal fluctuations in weather to subsecond dynamic control and balancing of electrical generation and demand must be understood and managed. ILLUSTRATION: JOSH BAUER AND BESIKI KAZAISHVILI, NREL Harvested by advanced technical systems honed over decades of research and development, wind energy has become a mainstream energy resource. However, continued innovation is needed to realize the potential of wind to serve the global demand for clean energy. Here, we outline three interdependent, cross-disciplinary grand challenges underpinning this research endeavor. The first is the need for a deeper understanding of the physics of atmospheric flow in the critical zone of plant operation. The second involves science and engineering of the largest dynamic, rotating machines in the world. The third encompasses optimization and control of fleets of wind plants working synergistically within the electricity grid. Addressing these challenges could enable wind power to provide as much as half of our global electricity needs and perhaps beyond.

[1]  R. Boisard,et al.  Aerodynamic Behavior of a Floating Offshore Wind Turbine , 2019, AIAA Journal.

[2]  No Author 2018 Wind Technologies Market Report , 2019 .

[3]  Kathryn E. Johnson,et al.  Wind direction estimation using SCADA data with consensus-based optimization , 2019 .

[4]  Hannele Holttinen,et al.  Inter-sectoral effects of high renewable energy share in global energy system , 2019, Renewable Energy.

[5]  J. Peinke,et al.  IEA Wind TCP: Results of IEA Wind TCP Workshop on a Grand Vision for Wind Energy Technology , 2019 .

[6]  Hannele Holttinen,et al.  Including operational aspects in the planning of power systems with large amounts of variable generation: A review of modeling approaches , 2019, WIREs Energy and Environment.

[7]  Aaron P. Stebner,et al.  Recycling glass fiber thermoplastic composites from wind turbine blades , 2019, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[8]  C. Meneveau Big wind power: seven questions for turbulence research , 2019, Journal of Turbulence.

[9]  G. Steinfeld,et al.  An active power control approach for wake-induced load alleviation in a fully developed wind farm boundary layer , 2018, Wind Energy Science.

[10]  Simon K. Siedersleben,et al.  Micrometeorological impacts of offshore wind farms as seen in observations and simulations , 2018, Environmental Research Letters.

[11]  Daniel T. Kaffine,et al.  Costs and consequences of wind turbine wake effects arising from uncoordinated wind energy development , 2018, Nature Energy.

[12]  K. Hansen,et al.  Does the wind turbine wake follow the topography? A multi-lidar study in complex terrain , 2018 .

[13]  Kathryn E. Johnson,et al.  A Framework for Autonomous Wind Farms: Wind Direction Consensus , 2018 .

[14]  S. Larsen,et al.  Variation of boundary‐layer wind spectra with height , 2018, Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society.

[15]  Chang Xu,et al.  Atmospheric stability and topography effects on wind turbine performance and wake properties in complex terrain , 2018, Renewable Energy.

[16]  Filip Johnsson,et al.  A comparison of variation management strategies for wind power integration in different electricity system contexts , 2018 .

[17]  C. Bottasso,et al.  Integration of multiple passive load mitigation technologies by automated design optimization-The case study of a medium-size onshore wind turbine , 2018, Wind Energy.

[18]  E. Bachynski,et al.  Critical assessment of non-linear hydrodynamic load models for a fully flexible monopile offshore wind turbine , 2018, Ocean Engineering.

[19]  T. M. Jahns,et al.  Comparison of Grid Following and Grid Forming Control for a High Inverter Penetration Power System , 2018, 2018 IEEE Power & Energy Society General Meeting (PESGM).

[20]  N. Wildmann,et al.  Wind turbine wake measurements with automatically adjusting scanning trajectories in a multi-Doppler lidar setup , 2018, Atmospheric Measurement Techniques.

[21]  Nicolai Gayle Nygaard,et al.  Wake behind an offshore wind farm observed with dual-Doppler radars , 2018, Journal of Physics: Conference Series.

[22]  Jan-Willem van Wingerden,et al.  Lidar-based closed-loop wake redirection in high-fidelity simulation , 2018, Journal of Physics: Conference Series.

[23]  Niels N. Sørensen,et al.  Measured aerodynamic forces on a full scale 2MW turbine in comparison with EllipSys3D and HAWC2 simulations , 2018, Journal of Physics: Conference Series.

[24]  Paul Fleming,et al.  A simulation study demonstrating the importance of large-scale trailing vortices in wake steering , 2018 .

[25]  Jianhu Zhao,et al.  Remote Sensing of Sub-Surface Suspended Sediment Concentration by Using the Range Bias of Green Surface Point of Airborne LiDAR Bathymetry , 2018, Remote. Sens..

[26]  Davide Trabucchi,et al.  IEA Wind Task 32: Wind Lidar Identifying and Mitigating Barriers to the Adoption of Wind Lidar , 2018, Remote. Sens..

[27]  Simon K. Siedersleben,et al.  First in situ evidence of wakes in the far field behind offshore wind farms , 2018, Scientific Reports.

[28]  George N. Barakos,et al.  Final results from the EU project AVATAR: aerodynamic modelling of 10 MW wind turbines , 2016 .

[29]  Paul M. Weaver,et al.  Effects of aeroelastic tailoring on performance characteristics of wind turbine systems , 2017 .

[30]  Julie K. Lundquist,et al.  Evaluation of the wind farm parameterization in the Weather Research and Forecasting model (version 3.8.1) with meteorological and turbine power data , 2017 .

[31]  Jennifer Annoni,et al.  From wake steering to flow control , 2017 .

[32]  Vijay Vittal,et al.  Paving the Way: A Future Without Inertia Is Closer Than You Think , 2017, IEEE Power and Energy Magazine.

[33]  Henrik Sandberg,et al.  A Survey of Distributed Optimization and Control Algorithms for Electric Power Systems , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid.

[34]  Li Chen,et al.  Data Science: A New Paradigm in the Age of Big-Data Science and Analytics , 2017, New Math. Nat. Comput..

[35]  Johan Meyers,et al.  Model-based receding horizon control of wind farms for secondary frequency regulation , 2017 .

[36]  Jan-Willem van Wingerden,et al.  Active power control of waked wind farms , 2017 .

[37]  Sungjin Choi,et al.  A comparison of numerical simulations of breaking wave forces on a monopile structure using two different numerical models based on finite difference and finite volume methods , 2017 .

[38]  M. Song,et al.  Analyzing the decoupling relationship between marine economic growth and marine pollution in China , 2017 .

[39]  Jennifer Annoni,et al.  Full-Scale Field Test of Wake Steering , 2017 .

[40]  J. Mann,et al.  Complex terrain experiments in the New European Wind Atlas , 2017, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[41]  Brian B. Johnson,et al.  Achieving a 100% Renewable Grid: Operating Electric Power Systems with Extremely High Levels of Variable Renewable Energy , 2017, IEEE Power and Energy Magazine.

[42]  Kurt Schaldemose Hansen,et al.  Mesoscale to microscale wind farm flow modeling and evaluation , 2017 .

[43]  Brandon L. Ennis,et al.  Second Year Report of the Atmosphere to Electrons Mesoscale to Microscale Coupling Project: Nonstationary Modeling Techniques and Assessment , 2017 .

[44]  Srinivas Sriramula,et al.  Ultimate loads and response analysis of a monopile supported offshore wind turbine using fully coupled simulation , 2017 .

[45]  Charles Meneveau,et al.  Flow Structure and Turbulence in Wind Farms , 2017 .

[46]  Simon Boxley The Revolution Now , 2017 .

[47]  V. Vittal,et al.  A Future without Inertia is Closer than you Think , 2017 .

[48]  Lei Zhang,et al.  Southward shift of the global wind energy resource under high carbon dioxide emissions , 2017, Nature Geoscience.

[49]  C. German,et al.  Exploring ocean worlds on Earth and beyond , 2017, Nature Geoscience.

[50]  L. D. Monache,et al.  Improving Wind Predictions in the Marine Atmospheric Boundary Layer Through Parameter Estimation in a Single Column Model , 2017 .

[51]  Morten Hartvig Hansen,et al.  Fundamental aeroelastic properties of a bend–twist coupled blade section , 2017 .

[52]  Ray W. Grout,et al.  Turbulent Flow Simulation at the Exascale: Opportunities and Challenges Workshop: August 4-5, 2015, Washington, D.C. , 2017 .

[53]  Morten Hartvig Hansen,et al.  Modal properties and stability of bend–twist coupled wind turbine blades , 2016 .

[54]  Niels N. Sørensen,et al.  Fluid–structure interaction computations for geometrically resolved rotor simulations using CFD , 2016 .

[55]  Carlo L. Bottasso,et al.  Periodic stability analysis of wind turbines operating in turbulent wind conditions , 2016 .

[56]  J. Lundquist,et al.  Gusts and shear within hurricane eyewalls can exceed offshore wind turbine design standards , 2016, 1610.00739.

[57]  Paul Donohoo-Vallett Revolution...Now The Future Arrives for Five Clean Energy Technologies – 2016 Update , 2016 .

[58]  Yingchen Zhang,et al.  Computational fluid dynamics simulation study of active power control in wind plants , 2016, 2016 American Control Conference (ACC).

[59]  Lance Manuel,et al.  On the Use of Coupled Wind, Wave, and Current Fields in the Simulation of Loads on Bottom-Supported Offshore Wind Turbines during Hurricanes: March 2012 - September 2015 , 2016 .

[60]  Susan E. Lee,et al.  Ground-level climate at a peatland wind farm in Scotland is affected by wind turbine operation , 2016 .

[61]  Erik Schultes,et al.  The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship , 2016, Scientific Data.

[62]  Poul Erik Morthorst,et al.  Long-term research challenges in wind energy – a research agenda by the European Academy of Wind Energy , 2016 .

[63]  Jason R. Marden,et al.  Wind plant power optimization through yaw control using a parametric model for wake effects—a CFD simulation study , 2016 .

[64]  S. Ott,et al.  The Explicit Wake Parametrisation V1.0: a wind farm parametrisation in the mesoscale model WRF , 2015 .

[65]  Benjamin F. Hobbs,et al.  The Evolution of the Market: Designing a Market for High Levels of Variable Generation , 2015, IEEE Power and Energy Magazine.

[66]  Kara Clark,et al.  Alternatives No More: Wind and Solar Power Are Mainstays of a Clean, Reliable, Affordable Grid , 2015, IEEE Power and Energy Magazine.

[67]  Vahan Gevorgian,et al.  Investigating the Impacts of Wind Generation Participation in Interconnection Frequency Response , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy.

[68]  Jianhui Wang,et al.  Stochastic Optimization for Unit Commitment—A Review , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[69]  K. Freudenreich,et al.  How can a wind turbine survive in tropical cyclone , 2014 .

[70]  H. Bredmose,et al.  Forcing of a bottom-mounted circular cylinder by steep regular water waves at finite depth , 2014, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[71]  Anand Natarajan,et al.  Influence of second-order random wave kinematics on the design loads of offshore wind turbine support structures , 2014 .

[72]  Luca Delle Monache,et al.  Meteorology For Coastal/Offshore Wind Energy In The United States: Recommendations And Research Needs For The Next 10 Years , 2014 .

[73]  Bonjun Koo,et al.  Model Tests for a Floating Wind Turbine on Three Different Floaters , 2014 .

[74]  Julie K. Lundquist,et al.  Quantifying Wind Turbine Wake Characteristics from Scanning Remote Sensor Data , 2014 .

[75]  T. W. Horst,et al.  Crop Wind Energy Experiment (CWEX): Observations of Surface-Layer, Boundary Layer, and Mesoscale Interactions with a Wind Farm , 2013 .

[76]  David W. Keith,et al.  Are global wind power resource estimates overstated? , 2013 .

[77]  S. Larsen,et al.  Remote Sensing for Wind Energy , 2013 .

[78]  Eric Lantz,et al.  WP2 IEA Wind Task 26:The Past and Future Cost of Wind Energy , 2013 .

[79]  C. L. Archer,et al.  Saturation wind power potential and its implications for wind energy , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[80]  Jimy Dudhia,et al.  Local and mesoscale impacts of wind farms as parameterized in a mesoscale NWP model , 2012 .

[81]  Julie K. Lundquist,et al.  Mesoscale Influences of Wind Farms throughout a Diurnal Cycle , 2012 .

[82]  John L. Schroeder,et al.  Measuring a Utility-Scale Turbine Wake Using the TTUKa Mobile Research Radars , 2012 .

[83]  Maureen Hand,et al.  IEA Wind Task 26: The Past and Future Cost of Wind Energy, Work Package 2 , 2012 .

[84]  Jason Jonkman,et al.  Atmospheric and Wake Turbulence Impacts on Wind Turbine Fatigue Loading: Preprint , 2012 .

[85]  Peter Jamieson,et al.  Innovation in Wind Turbine Design: Jamieson/Innovation in Wind Turbine Design , 2011 .

[86]  C. Meneveau,et al.  Large eddy simulation study of fully developed wind-turbine array boundary layers , 2010 .

[87]  Jason Jonkman,et al.  Dynamics of offshore floating wind turbines—model development and verification , 2009 .

[88]  Lennart Söder,et al.  Design and operation of power systems with large amounts of wind power , 2009 .

[89]  Rebecca J. Barthelmie,et al.  Review of Methodologies for Offshore Wind Resource Assessment in European Seas , 2008 .

[90]  Charlotte Bay Hasager,et al.  Remote Sensing Observation Used in Offshore Wind Energy , 2008, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing.

[91]  David W Keith,et al.  The influence of large-scale wind power on global climate. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[92]  J. Wyngaard Toward Numerical Modeling in the “Terra Incognita” , 2004 .

[93]  Walter Musial,et al.  Trends in the Design, Manufacture and Evaluation of Wind Turbine Blades , 2003 .

[94]  J. Sørensen,et al.  Analysis of wake states by a full‐field actuator disc model , 1998 .

[95]  J. R. Connell,et al.  Three-Dimensional Wind Simulation , 1998 .

[96]  J. Mann The spatial structure of neutral atmospheric surface-layer turbulence , 1994, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[97]  J. Kaimal,et al.  Spectral Characteristics of Surface-Layer Turbulence , 1972 .

[98]  A. Betz Wind-energie und ihre ausnutzung durch windmühlen , 1926 .