Influence of pyelocaliceal anatomy on the success of flexible ureteroscopic approach.

INTRODUCTION Some particularities of pyelocaliceal anatomy are described to influence the success rate of flexible ureteroscopy. The aim of this study was to evaluate the correlation between anatomy (infundibulopelvic angle, length of the inferior caliceal infundibulum) and the success of flexible ureteroscopic approach of lower calyx. MATERIALS AND METHODS We studied 47 patients in whom flexible ureteroscopic procedures were performed between October 2002 and October 2006: 43 cases with inferior caliceal calculi or multiple caliceal (including the inferior calyx) lithiasis and 4 patients with inferior calyx diverticulae and intradiverticular lithiasis. In patients with multiple caliceal calculi, we only evaluated the success of flexible ureteroscopic approach of the inferior caliceal ones. Infundibulopelvic angle was wider than 90 degrees in 8 cases, ranged between 30 degrees and 90 degrees in 35 cases, and was smaller than 30 degrees in 4 cases. RESULTS The success rate was 87.5% (7/8 patients) in patients with infundibulopelvic angle wider than 90 degrees, 74.3 % (26/35 patients) when this angle ranged between 30 degrees and 90 degrees, and 0 % (0/4 patients) in patients with infundibulopelvic angle smaller than 30 degrees. In patients with infundibulopelvic angle between 30 degrees and 90 degrees, the success rate was 88.2% when the length of the inferior caliceal infundibulum was shorter than 3 cm and only 61.1% when it was longer. CONCLUSIONS Pyelocaliceal anatomy influences the performances of flexible ureteroscopy. This parameter, lesion location (stone or tumor) and the influence of accessory instruments on flexible ureteroscope's deflection should be evaluated before recommending flexible ureteroscopic approach.

[1]  P. Alken,et al.  Flexible ureterorenoscopy for the treatment of lower pole calyx stones: influence of different lithotripsy probes and stone extraction tools on scope deflection and irrigation flow. , 2002, European urology.

[2]  M. Grasso,et al.  Retrograde ureteropyeloscopy for lower pole caliceal calculi. , 2000, The Journal of urology.

[3]  R. Clayman,et al.  Lower caliceal stone clearance after shock wave lithotripsy or ureteroscopy: the impact of lower pole radiographic anatomy. , 1998, Journal of Urology.

[4]  A. Ziada,et al.  Predictive factors of lower calyceal stone clearance after Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy (ESWL): a focus on the infundibulopelvic anatomy. , 2005, European urology.

[5]  Olivier Traxer,et al.  Impact on active scope deflection and irrigation flow of all endoscopic working tools during flexible ureteroscopy. , 2004, European urology.

[6]  L. Irkilata,et al.  The impact of radiological anatomy in clearance of lower caliceal stones after shock wave lithotripsy , 2007, Urological Research.

[7]  R. Clayman,et al.  The effect of patient position on intrarenal anatomy. , 1999, Journal of endourology.

[8]  R. Ballario,et al.  Impact of anatomical pielocaliceal topography in the treatment of renal lower calyces stones with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy , 2005, International journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association.

[9]  F. Keeley,et al.  Flexible ureteroscopes: a user's guide , 2002, BJU international.

[10]  A. Zisman,et al.  Retrograde intrarenal lithotripsy outcome after failure of shock wave lithotripsy. , 2003, The Journal of urology.