Influence of pyelocaliceal anatomy on the success of flexible ureteroscopic approach.
暂无分享,去创建一个
Razvan Multescu | Bogdan Geavlete | Petrisor Geavlete | B. Geavlete | P. Geavlete | R. Mulțescu | R. Multescu
[1] P. Alken,et al. Flexible ureterorenoscopy for the treatment of lower pole calyx stones: influence of different lithotripsy probes and stone extraction tools on scope deflection and irrigation flow. , 2002, European urology.
[2] M. Grasso,et al. Retrograde ureteropyeloscopy for lower pole caliceal calculi. , 2000, The Journal of urology.
[3] R. Clayman,et al. Lower caliceal stone clearance after shock wave lithotripsy or ureteroscopy: the impact of lower pole radiographic anatomy. , 1998, Journal of Urology.
[4] A. Ziada,et al. Predictive factors of lower calyceal stone clearance after Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy (ESWL): a focus on the infundibulopelvic anatomy. , 2005, European urology.
[5] Olivier Traxer,et al. Impact on active scope deflection and irrigation flow of all endoscopic working tools during flexible ureteroscopy. , 2004, European urology.
[6] L. Irkilata,et al. The impact of radiological anatomy in clearance of lower caliceal stones after shock wave lithotripsy , 2007, Urological Research.
[7] R. Clayman,et al. The effect of patient position on intrarenal anatomy. , 1999, Journal of endourology.
[8] R. Ballario,et al. Impact of anatomical pielocaliceal topography in the treatment of renal lower calyces stones with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy , 2005, International journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association.
[9] F. Keeley,et al. Flexible ureteroscopes: a user's guide , 2002, BJU international.
[10] A. Zisman,et al. Retrograde intrarenal lithotripsy outcome after failure of shock wave lithotripsy. , 2003, The Journal of urology.