Affinity maturation and hypermutation in a simulation of the humoral immune response

By experimenting with a cellular automaton model of the immune system, we have reproduced affinity maturation of the antibody response, a somatic adaptation to a changing environment. The simulation allowed the isolation of a number of variables, e.g. the fraction of repertoire available, the magnitude of the change in affinity with mutation, the mutation frequency and its focus on the complementarity‐determining regions (CDR) of the antibody. Multiple series of immunizations were run in machina where the contribution of each variable was evaluated against the maturation observed. We found that hypermutation is not necessary for affinity maturation if the repertoire of B cell specificities is sufficiently complete, but is essential when the B cell diversity is limited (which happens to be the case in vivo), as it fills the holes in the repertoire and allows selection by antigen. Maturation also depends on the magnitude of the change in affinity with mutation, and we supply some necessary limits on this parameter. For mutations confined to the CDR, the most efficient maturation occurs at mutation rates of 0.2 per paratope and per cell division. When mutations also affect the framework regions, the peak of the most effective CDR mutation rate moves progressively to lower values. A most sensitive parameter is the speed of maturation, which reflects the rate of expansion of mutated clones. Comparing it with biological observations can help to discriminate between alternative hypotheses on the phenomena of hypermutation and affinity.

[1]  T. Manser,et al.  The efficiency of antibody affinity maturation: can the rate of B-cell division be limiting? , 1990, Immunology today.

[2]  M. Shlomchik,et al.  The Influence of Somatic Mutation on Clonal Expansion , 1989 .

[3]  H. Eisen,et al.  VARIATIONS IN AFFINITIES OF ANTIBODIES DURING THE IMMUNE RESPONSE. , 1964, Biochemistry.

[4]  F Celada,et al.  The cellular basis of immunologic memory. , 1971, Progress in allergy.

[5]  A Cumano,et al.  Evolutionary and somatic selection of the antibody repertoire in the mouse. , 1987, Science.

[6]  H. Eisen,et al.  SEQUENTIAL CHANGES IN THE RELATIVE AFFINITY OF ANTIBODIES SYNTHESIZED DURING THE IMMUNE RESPONSE , 1967, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[7]  G W Siskind,et al.  Cell selection by antigen in the immune response. , 1969, Advances in immunology.

[8]  K. Rajewsky,et al.  The repertoire of somatic antibody mutants accumulating in the memory compartment after primary immunization is restricted through affinity maturation and mirrors that expressed in the secondary response , 1990, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[9]  C. Milstein,et al.  Targeting of non-lg sequences in place of the V segment by somatic hyper mutation , 1995, Nature.

[10]  T. Manser,et al.  Evaluation of loss and change of specificity resulting from random mutagenesis of an antibody VH region. , 1995, Journal of immunology.

[11]  T. Kepler,et al.  Somatic hypermutation in B cells: an optimal control treatment. , 1993, Journal of theoretical biology.

[12]  C. Milstein,et al.  Discriminating intrinsic and antigen-selected mutational hotspots in immunoglobulin V genes. , 1993, Immunology today.

[13]  L. Staudt,et al.  Generation of antibody diversity in the immune response of BALB/c mice to influenza virus hemagglutinin. , 1984, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[14]  P E Seiden,et al.  Modelling thymic functions in a cellular automaton. , 1995, International immunology.

[15]  J. Foote,et al.  Kinetic and affinity limits on antibodies produced during immune responses. , 1995, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[16]  C. Chothia,et al.  Domain association in immunoglobulin molecules. The packing of variable domains. , 1985, Journal of molecular biology.

[17]  E. Steele Somatic hypermutation in V-regions. , 1991 .

[18]  J. Weill,et al.  Hypermutation generating the sheep immunoglobulin repertoire is an antigen-independent process , 1995, Cell.

[19]  P. Casali,et al.  The CDR1 sequences of a major proportion of human germline Ig VH genes are inherently susceptible to amino acid replacement. , 1994, Immunology today.

[20]  P E Seiden,et al.  A model for simulating cognate recognition and response in the immune system. , 1992, Journal of theoretical biology.

[21]  A S Perelson,et al.  Cyclic re-entry of germinal center B cells and the efficiency of affinity maturation. , 1993, Immunology today.

[22]  G. Nossal,et al.  Antigen-driven B cell differentiation in vivo , 1993, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[23]  E. Kabat,et al.  Sequences of proteins of immunological interest , 1991 .

[24]  F. Celada,et al.  Determination of avidity of anti-albumin antibodies in the mouse. Influence of the number of cells transferred on the quality of the secondary adoptive response. , 1969, Immunology.

[25]  I. Meilijson,et al.  Maturation of the humoral immune response as an optimization problem , 1991, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[26]  P E Seiden,et al.  A computer model of cellular interactions in the immune system. , 1992, Immunology today.

[27]  R M Zinkernagel,et al.  Early high-affinity neutralizing anti-viral IgG responses without further overall improvements of affinity. , 1995, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.