Relationships among the academic business disciplines: a multi-method citation analysis

Abstract A great number of papers have been published that compare the quality or impact of academic journals. This article seeks to broaden the debate on journal evaluation by showing how top journals in various academic business disciplines, as defined by the Financial Times list of top research outlets, relate to one other. Using large-scale sociometric analyses on about 140,000 citations we found that the integration of the citation network has increased over time. Moreover, the information flow from Finance and Economics to Management has become stronger and, within Management, a polarization between information generators and users has taken place. We also found that most business academics published in distinct and mostly non-overlapping disciplines. The only exceptions were Finance and Economics as well as Strategic Management and OB/HR. Surprisingly, we also found that the general business journals, which could be assumed to be cited by most other journals across the management disciplines, are not central to the entire field. For instance, they are not complementary at all to Finance and Economics. Instead, Operations Research (OR) and Management Information Systems journals occupy the central space on the perceptual map. This indicates that these disciplines (and OR in particular) are complementary with Management and with Finance and Economics.

[1]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  Research Commentary: Rethinking "Diversity" in Information Systems Research , 1996, Inf. Syst. Res..

[2]  A. Sharplin,et al.  The Relative Importance of Journals Used in Management Research: An Alternative Ranking , 1985 .

[3]  Arnold Reisman,et al.  The Devolution of OR/MS: Implications from a Statistical Content Analysis of Papers in Flagship Journals , 1994, Oper. Res..

[4]  Michael J. Stahl,et al.  Publication In Leading Management Journals as a Measure of Institutional Research Productivity , 1988 .

[5]  Clyde W. Holsapple,et al.  An empirical assessment of influences on POM research , 1996 .

[6]  Richard T. Mowday,et al.  Celebrating 40 years of the Academy of Management Journal , 1997 .

[7]  A. Field.  Discovering statistics using SPSS for Windows. , 2000 .

[8]  A. Tahai,et al.  A revealed preference study of management journals' direct influences , 1999 .

[9]  R. Hanneman.  Introduction to Social Network Methods , 2001 .

[10]  K. McCain.  Mapping Authors in Intellectual Space , 1989 .

[11]  Jeremy B. Fox,et al.  A multi-method evaluation of journals in the decision and management sciences by US academics , 2000 .

[12]  Xianggui Qu,et al.  Multivariate Data Analysis , 2007, Technometrics.

[13]  M. Jones,et al.  Critically evaluating an applications vs theory framework for research quality , 1999 .

[14]  John C. Lind,et al.  Two-sample T–2 procedure and the assumption of homogeneous covariance matrices. , 1979 .

[15]  W. Velicer,et al.  Relation of sample size to the stability of component patterns. , 1988, Psychological bulletin.

[16]  R. MacCallum,et al.  Sample size in factor analysis. , 1999 .

[17]  M. Holbrook,et al.  The Intellectual Structure of Consumer Research: A Bibliometric Study of Author Cocitations in the First 15 Years of the Journal of Consumer Research , 1993 .

[18]  John R. Doyle,et al.  Judging the quality of research in business schools: The UK as a case study , 1995 .

[19]  Katherine W. McCain,et al.  Mapping authors in intellectual space: A technical overview , 1990, Journal of the American Society for Information Science.

[20]  Michael John Jones,et al.  Journal evaluation methodologies: A balanced response , 1996 .

[21]  R. Pieters,et al.  The Structural Influence of Marketing Journals: A Citation Analysis of the Discipline and its Subareas over Time , 2003 .

[22]  Gyula Vastag,et al.  Journal characteristics, rankings and social acculturation in operations management , 2002 .

[23]  Symonds Em.  Research assessment exercise , 1998 .

[24]  R. Coe,et al.  Evaluating the management journals: a second look. , 1984, Academy of Management journal. Academy of Management.

[25]  Mark S. Granovetter.  The Strength of Weak Ties , 1973, American Journal of Sociology.

[26]  J. Tanner,et al.  A Normalized Citation Analysis of Real Estate Journals , 1999 .

[27]  Gobinda G. Chowdhury,et al.  Journal as Markers of Intellectual Space: Journal Co-Citation Analysis of Information Retrieval Area, 1987–1997 , 2004, Scientometrics.

[28]  P. M. Podsakoff,et al.  Journal Influence in the Field of Management: An Analysis Using Salancik's Index in a Dependency Network , 1994 .

[29]  Henry M. Kim,et al.  Electronic marketplaces versus enterprise resource planning: a comparison and decision methodology for supply chain management , 2003 .

[30]  Morten T. Hansen,et al.  The Search-Transfer Problem: The Role of Weak Ties in Sharing Knowledge across Organization Subunits , 1999 .

[31]  A. Goldman.  Publishing Activity in Marketing as an Indicator of Its Structure and Disciplinary Boundaries , 1979 .