Coherence Marking, Prior Knowledge, and Comprehension of Informative and Persuasive Texts: Sorting Things Out

Coherence plays a central role when readers construct meaning from a text. Previous research has shown how coherence marking affects text processing and representation. However, this effect seems to depend on reader's prior knowledge of the text content: Low knowledge readers benefit from coherence marking, whereas high knowledge readers benefit from a more implicit text (McNamara & Kintsch, 1996). Because this interaction was not consistently found in previous research, this article takes a closer look at the operationalization of the experimental variables: coherence marking, prior knowledge, and text comprehension. Also, this article compares the effect on both informative and persuasive texts. Results indicate that linguistic marking of coherence indeed interacts with prior knowledge in the informative genre, but not in the persuasive genre.

[1]  Eduardo Vidal-Abarca,et al.  Some good texts are always better: text revision to foster inferences of readers with high and low prior background knowledge , 2005 .

[2]  John Sweller,et al.  Cognitive load theory and instructional design , 1997 .

[3]  Liesbeth Degand,et al.  The impact of relational markers on expository text comprehension in L1 and L2 , 2002 .

[4]  Ted Sanders,et al.  Cohesion and Coherence: Linguistic Approaches , 2006 .

[5]  Margaret G. McKeown,et al.  The Contribution of Prior Knowledge and Coherent Text to Comprehension , 1992 .

[6]  Nathalie Blanc,et al.  Updating Spatial Situation Models: Effects of Prior Knowledge andTask Demands , 2001 .

[7]  T. Sanders.  Semantic and pragmatic sources of coherence: On the categorization of coherence relations in context , 1997 .

[8]  Deborah P. Birkmire.  Text Processing: The Influence of Text Structure, Background Knowledge, and Purpose. , 1985 .

[9]  B. Meyer.  Use of Top-Level Structure in Text: Key for Reading Comprehension of Ninth-Grade Students. , 1980 .

[10]  F. Paas,et al.  Cognitive Load Theory and Instructional Design: Recent Developments , 2003 .

[11]  P. Schellens,et al.  Argumentation Schemes in Persuasive Brochures , 2004 .

[12]  Danielle S. McNamara,et al.  Learning from texts: Effects of prior knowledge and text coherence , 1996 .

[13]  Ted Sanders,et al.  The Role of Coherence Relations and Their Linguistic Markers in Text Processing , 2000 .

[14]  A. Graesser,et al.  Need to Learn in Order to Process Coherence Relations in Narrative and Expository Text ? , 2002 .

[15]  Walter Kintsch,et al.  Comprehension: A Paradigm for Cognition , 1998 .

[16]  D. McNamara.  Reading both high-coherence and low-coherence texts: effects of text sequence and prior knowledge. , 2001, Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale.

[17]  Michael Halliday,et al.  Cohesion in English , 1976 .

[18]  C. van Wijk.  Toetsende statistiek: Basistechnieken. Een praktijkgerichte inleiding voor onderzoekers van taal, gedrag en communicatie , 2000 .

[19]  F. Paas,et al.  Cognitive Load Measurement as a Means to Advance Cognitive Load Theory , 2003 .

[20]  Leo G. M. Noordman,et al.  The different functions of a conjunction in constructing a representation of the discourse , 1997 .

[21]  Judith A. Langer.  Examining Background Knowledge and Text Comprehension. , 1984 .

[22]  Leo G. M. Noordman,et al.  Toward a taxonomy of coherence relations , 1992 .

[23]  Rolf A. Zwaan,et al.  The Forewarning Effect of Coherence Markers in Persuasive Discourse: Evidence From Persuasion and Processing , 2008 .

[24]  Yves Bestgen,et al.  The impact of connectives and anaphoric expressions on expository discourse comprehension , 1999 .

[25]  Lucia Mason,et al.  Topic Knowledge, Text Coherence, and Interest: How They Interact in Learning From Instructional Texts , 2003 .

[26]  Jerry R. Hobbs.  Coherence and Coreference , 1979, Cogn. Sci..

[27]  James F. Voss,et al.  Learning From History Text: The Interaction of Knowledge and Comprehension Skill with Text Structure , 1996 .

[28]  Cathy M. Roller,et al.  The Interaction of Knowledge and Structure Variables in the Processing of Expository Prose (Commentary). , 1990 .

[29]  B. K. Britton,et al.  Effects of Text Structure on Use of Cognitive Capacity during Reading. , 1982 .

[30]  D. O’Keefe.  Persuasion , 1990, The Handbook of Communication Skills.

[31]  T. Sanders,et al.  Discourse and Text Structure , 2010 .

[32]  Liu Cuilian.  On Cohesion and Coherence , 2007 .

[33]  R. Mayer,et al.  Cognitive Principles of Multimedia Learning: The Role of Modality and Contiguity , 1999 .

[34]  W. Kintsch,et al.  Are Good Texts Always Better? Interactions of Text Coherence, Background Knowledge, and Levels of Understanding in Learning From Text , 1996 .

[35]  B. K. Britton.  Understanding expository text: Building mental structures to induce insights. , 1994 .

[36]  Timothy C. Standal,et al.  Signals in Expository Prose: Effects on Reading Comprehension. , 1987 .