Storage-yield analysis of surface water reservoirs: the role of reliability constraints and operating policies

Stochastic optimization methods are used for optimal design and operation of surface water reservoir systems under uncertainty. Chance-constrained (CC) optimization with linear decision rules (LDRs) is an old approach for determining the minimum reservoir capacity required to meet a specific yield at a target level of reliability. However, this approach has been found to overestimate the reservoir capacity. In this paper, we propose the reason for this overestimation to be the fact that the reliability constraints considered in standard CC LDR models do not have the same meaning as in other models such as reservoir operation simulation models. The simulation models have fulfilled a target reliability level in an average sense (i.e., annually), whereas the standard CC LDR models have met the target reliability level every season of the year. Mixed integer nonlinear programs are presented to clarify the distinction between the two types of reliability constraints and demonstrate that the use of seasonal reliability constraints, rather than an average reliability constraint, leads to 80–150 % and 0–32 % excess capacity for SQ-type and S-type CC LDR models, respectively. Additionally, a modified CC LDR model with an average reliability constraint is proposed to overcome the reservoir capacity overestimation problem. In the second stage, we evaluate different operating policies and show that for the seasonal (average) reliability constraints, open-loop, S-type, standard operating policy, SQ-type, and general SQ-type policies compared to a model not using any operation rule lead to 190–460 % (200–550 %), 100–200 % (80–300 %), 0–90 % (0–60 %), 30–90 % (0–20 %), and 10–90 % (0–10 %) excess capacity, respectively.

[1]  C. Revelle,et al.  The Linear Decision Rule in Reservoir Management and Design: 1, Development of the Stochastic Model , 1969 .

[2]  Charles ReVelle,et al.  Linear Decision Rule in Reservoir Management and Design: 2. Performance Optimization , 1970 .

[3]  Daniel P. Loucks,et al.  Some Comments on Linear Decision Rules and Chance Constraints , 1970 .

[4]  John Eastman,et al.  Linear decision rule in reservoir management and design: 3. Direct capacity determination and intraseasonal constraints , 1973 .

[5]  Charles ReVelle,et al.  Linear decision rule in reservoir management and design: 5. A general algorithm , 1975 .

[6]  Charles ReVelle,et al.  Linear decision rule in reservoir management and design: 4. A rule that minimizes output variance , 1975 .

[7]  Daniel P. Loucks,et al.  An evaluation of some linear decision rules in chance‐Constrained models for reservoir planning and operation , 1975 .

[8]  M. Houck A Chance Constrained Optimization Model for reservoir design and operation , 1979 .

[9]  Miguel A. Mariño,et al.  Reliability programing in reservoir management: 1. Single multipurpose reservoir , 1980 .

[10]  J. Cohon,et al.  Linear decision rule in reservoir design and management: 6. Incorporation of economic efficiency benefits and hydroelectric energy generation , 1980 .

[11]  Miguel A. Mariño,et al.  Reliability programing in reservoir management: 2. Risk‐loss functions , 1981 .

[12]  Erhard F. Joeres,et al.  The Linear Decision Rule (LDR) reservoir problem with correlated inflows: 1. model development , 1981 .

[13]  S. Simonovic,et al.  Reliability programing in reservoir management: 3. System of multipurpose reservoirs , 1982 .

[14]  Jery R. Stedinger,et al.  Multiple reservoir system screening models , 1983 .

[15]  J. Stedinger The Performance of LDR Models for Preliminary Design and Reservoir Operation , 1984 .

[16]  A. Georgakakos Extended linear quadratic Gaussian control: Further extensions , 1989 .

[17]  K. Ponnambalam,et al.  Estimation of reservoir yield and storage distribution using moments analysis , 1996 .

[18]  K. Ponnambalam,et al.  Constrained state formulation for the stochastic control of multireservoir systems , 1998 .

[19]  T. B. M. J. Ouarda,et al.  Chance-constrained optimal control for multireservoir system optimization and risk analysis , 2001 .

[20]  Fakhri Karray,et al.  Reservoir Operation Using a Dynamic Programming Fuzzy Rule–Based Approach , 2005 .

[21]  Fakhri Karray,et al.  Inferring operating rules for reservoir operations using fuzzy regression and ANFIS , 2007, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[22]  K. Ponnambalam,et al.  Stochastic control of reservoir systems using indicator functions: New enhancements , 2008 .

[23]  Guohe Huang,et al.  Multistage scenario-based interval-stochastic programming for planning water resources allocation , 2009 .

[24]  Guohe Huang,et al.  A fuzzy-Markov-chain-based analysis method for reservoir operation , 2012, Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment.

[25]  A. Ganji,et al.  Advance first order second moment (AFOSM) method for single reservoir operation reliability analysis: a case study , 2011, Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment.

[26]  Wei Li,et al.  Inexact fuzzy two-stage programming for water resources management in an environment of fuzziness and randomness , 2012, Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment.

[27]  Ping Guo,et al.  Inexact stochastic dynamic programming method and application to water resources management in Shandong China under uncertainty , 2013, Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment.

[28]  Chao Xu,et al.  Development of a fuzzy-queue-based stochastic quadratic program for water resources planning , 2014, Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment.

[29]  Kumaraswamy Ponnambalam,et al.  Parambikulam-Aliyar Project Operations Optimization with Reliability Constraints , 2013 .