Societal acceptance of wind farms: Analysis of four common themes across Australian case studies

Australia's renewable energy target (RET) seeks to provide 20 per cent of Australia's electricity generation from renewable energy sources by 2020. As wind power is relatively advanced, it was anticipated that wind power will contribute a major component of the early target. However, high levels of societal resistance to wind farms, combined with new regulatory policies, indicate the RET may not be dominated by wind power. This research involved an examination of seven case studies around wind farm deployment. Qualitative interviews were the primary data for the case studies and analysed using methods informed by grounded theory. Despite the diversity of stakeholder views, the qualitative analysis identified strong community support for wind farms but four common themes emerged that influence this societal acceptance of wind farms in Australia: trust, distributional justice, procedural justice and place attachment. Without addressing these factors through integration into policy development and engagement approaches, wind energy is unlikely to provide the early and majority of new renewable energy. Similar international experiences are incorporated in the discussion of the Australian wind industry's societal acceptance.

[1]  B. van Hoven,et al.  Using Computers for Qualitative Data Analysis: An example using NUD.IST , 2003 .

[2]  P. Devine‐Wright.  Rethinking NIMBYism: The role of place attachment and place identity in explaining place‐protective action , 2009 .

[3]  Bram F. Noble,et al.  Barriers to renewable energy development: A case study of large-scale wind energy in Saskatchewan, Canada , 2012 .

[4]  Geraint Ellis,et al.  A review of the context for enhancing community acceptance of wind energy in Ireland , 2012 .

[5]  Ortwin Renn,et al.  A Brief Primer on Participation: Philosophy and Practice , 1995 .

[6]  D. Horst.  NIMBY or not? Exploring the relevance of location and the politics of voiced opinions in renewable energy siting controversies , 2007 .

[7]  Glenn A. Bowen.  Grounded Theory and Sensitizing Concepts , 2006 .

[8]  Patrick Devine-Wright,et al.  Social representations of electricity network technologies: exploring processes of anchoring and objectification through the use of visual research methods. , 2009, The British journal of social psychology.

[9]  Paul Ekins,et al.  Step changes for decarbonising the energy system: research needs for renewables, energy efficiency and nuclear power , 2004 .

[10]  Gareth Harrison,et al.  Change in public attitudes towards a Cornish wind farm: Implications for planning , 2008 .

[11]  James Prest.  The Bald Hills Wind Farm Debacle , 2007 .

[12]  M. Hoepfl.  Choosing Qualitative Research: A Primer for Technology Education Researchers , 1997 .

[13]  P. Devine‐Wright,et al.  Trust and community: Exploring the meanings, contexts and dynamics of community renewable energy , 2010 .

[14]  Maarten Wolsink,et al.  Wind power and the NIMBY-myth: institutional capacity and the limited significance of public support , 2000 .

[15]  Kieren Moffat,et al.  Constructing the Meaning of Social Licence , 2014 .

[16]  Peta Ashworth,et al.  Engaging the public on carbon dioxide capture and storage: Does a large group process work? , 2009 .

[17]  C. Gross,et al.  Community perspectives of wind energy in Australia: The application of a justice and community fairness framework to increase social acceptance , 2007 .

[18]  Joseph L. Arvai,et al.  Rethinking of risk communication: lessons from the decision sciences , 2007, Tree Genetics & Genomes.

[19]  Maarten Wolsink,et al.  Wind power implementation: The nature of public attitudes: Equity and fairness instead of ‘backyard motives’ , 2007 .

[20]  Kate Theobald,et al.  Urban wind power and the private sector: community benefits, social acceptance and public engagement , 2011 .

[21]  A. Brito-Melo,et al.  IEA-OES International Energy Agency Implementing Agreement on Ocean Energy Systems annual report 2008 , 2009 .

[22]  P. Devine‐Wright,et al.  Disruption to place attachment and the protection of restorative environments: A wind energy case study , 2010 .

[23]  Ortwin Renn,et al.  The Pursuit of Fair and Competent Citizen Participation , 1995 .

[24]  Hervé Corvellec.  Arguing for a license to operate: the case of the Swedish wind power industry , 2007 .

[25]  Carly McLachlan,et al.  'You don't do a chemistry experiment in your best china': Symbolic interpretations of place and technology in a wave energy case , 2009 .

[26]  L. Steg,et al.  Psychological factors influencing sustainable energy technology acceptance: A review-based comprehensive framework , 2012 .

[27]  Shayle Kann,et al.  Overcoming barriers to wind project finance in Australia , 2009 .

[28]  R. Hindmarsh.  Wind Farms and Community Engagement in Australia: A Critical Analysis for Policy Learning , 2010 .

[29]  Peta Ashworth,et al.  What's in store: lessons from implementing CCS , 2012 .

[30]  Patrick Devine-Wright,et al.  Beyond NIMBYism: towards an integrated framework for understanding public perceptions of wind energy , 2005 .

[31]  A. Strauss,et al.  The Discovery of Grounded Theory , 1967 .

[32]  D. Bell,et al.  The ‘Social Gap’ in Wind Farm Siting Decisions: Explanations and Policy Responses , 2005 .

[33]  Rolf Wüstenhagen,et al.  Social acceptance of renewable energy innovation: An introduction to the concept , 2007 .

[34]  G. Ellis,et al.  Many ways to say ‘no’, different ways to say ‘yes’: Applying Q-Methodology to understand public acceptance of wind farm proposals , 2007 .

[35]  Maureen H. McDonough,et al.  Beyond public participation: Fairness in natural resource decision making , 2001 .

[36]  A. Fleming,et al.  Using Discourse Analysis to Improve Extension Practice , 2009 .